Jeff
04-15-2014, 07:23 AM
This is getting so ridicules, I read one report where a gang of black thugs attacked a white man and beat him half to death ( because he was white ) and only one of those charged was charged with a hate crime, how can one be charged but the others involved in the same incident aren't ? And lets not forget the white idiot that thought it would be fun to try the knockout game against a older black man, he was charged instantly with a hate crime, what makes it different ? If you attack a person for no other reason than he/she is different than it should be a hate crime no matter what group is on the attack.
This is becoming old, isn't it? For those who have read anything Colin Flaherty and/or Taleeb Starkes (http://freedomoutpost.com/author/taleebstarkes/) have written, we know that when it comes to blacks injuring or killing whites, these type of crimes are rarely charged as "hate crimes." Such seems to be the case with one of the most recent situations involving a 16-year-old thug who goes by the street name "Red," and an innocent white victim who tried to fight for his life.
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/black-white-crime-hate-crime-apparently/
This is becoming old, isn't it? For those who have read anything Colin Flaherty and/or Taleeb Starkes (http://freedomoutpost.com/author/taleebstarkes/) have written, we know that when it comes to blacks injuring or killing whites, these type of crimes are rarely charged as "hate crimes." Such seems to be the case with one of the most recent situations involving a 16-year-old thug who goes by the street name "Red," and an innocent white victim who tried to fight for his life.
http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/black-white-crime-hate-crime-apparently/