The Globalization 5 -- How Globalization Changed America in 2013, and What It Might M

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edward-goldberg/the-globalization-5----ho_b_4377331.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592 3. Welcome to the age of Central Bank Power. Since the 2008 crash, the U.S Federal Reserve Bank has become a new type of global hegemon.

Financial globalization, combined with floating exchange rates, the fact that the dollar is the reserve currency, and the stability at this time of the US economy, have made the Fed the ultimate arbiter of international interest rates and investment flows. The Fed has become, singularly, without having any global mandate, one of the most powerful global institutions. Rumors of the possibility of the Fed tapering will, in and of themselves, cause investment capital to flow out of nations such as Brazil and India, while putting pressure on those nations to raise their interest rates.

Domestically, while Congress and the President have been gridlocked over fiscal issues, it has been the Fed that has been the leader in pushing the country out of the recession.

The European Central Bank has had a similar but not as powerful role within the politically gridlocked system of the Euro Zone.

4. NAFTA REDUX-

George H. Bush and Bill Clinton's dream of NAFTA is finally starting to come to fruition. NAFTA was philosophically partly based on the premise that uniting the economies of Mexico the United States and Canada through trade would create a larger economic market to compete with China. Practically it was also based on the idea that if the Mexican economy grew rapidly, fewer Mexican immigrants would come into the United States.

Now, due to rising labor and energy costs in China, rising shipping costs, and the reforms of the Mexican President Pena Nieto, Mexico is becoming a manufacturing engine. Illegal immigration into the United States has dramatically slowed, partially because of the recession but also because of the growth of the Mexican Economy.

According to Gary Hufbauer, a Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, "U.S. trade with its North American partners grew 156 percent in 20 years. Of course all three economies are larger: real North American gross domestic product grew 70 percent between 1993 and 2013 But real two-way trade grew faster than real gross domestic product, by a margin of 86 percentage points."

5. The dominant global-political/economic issue of 2014 will again be China.

Can China redirect its economy and maintain its growth rate under its current governing system? Or has the low-hanging fruit (cheap labor for manufacturing) already been picked and is it now facing an insurmountable growth wall fortified by vested interests, which will inhibit any change?

As important is the question of what will be the cost of change for China and the world? Will the Chinese government be able to continue to liberalize its economy without moving to the right on human rights issues? At the same time, will China's government become both more nationalist and more aggressive internationally? Or are these aggressive moves essential politically within the Chinese autocracy in order to protect the government from attacks on the right as it reforms the economy?

On a broader note, if the Chinese government can successfully balance its needs to fuel nationalism at home without accidentally stepping into a conflict with its neighbors, (many who are under the United States security umbrella), what happens to price and availability of world resources if China successfully brings another 300 million people into middle class status? What happens to the global prices of oil, agriculture and, yes, water? A great article . I thought it best in world history section here as it is designed to radically change the world and already has a lot more than most people know. The powerful 3 or 4 entities being formed now will so greatly alter the world 's future that its mind boggling to imagine. One thing is for sure to reach their goals America had to be and currently is being deliberately knocked down! Its not a conspiracy theory folks its everyday reality. Globalism has allied with socialism/and the leftists to accomplish that goal IMHO.. Check out the full article and perhaps it will give you a better insight into the fact that our nation's destiny is in the hands of foreign entities far more than it is in American hands. Our government has far to many bought and paid for(by foreign interests aka globalists) politicians. -Tyr

[fj1200]

The powerful 3 or 4 entities being formed now will so greatly alter the world 's future that its mind boggling to imagine.

Not quite sure where to start but how about here? What are those entities being formed?

Overall I don't see much in there that supports your Globalization fears IMO. Case in point; energy independence.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Not quite sure where to start but how about here? What are those entities being formed?

Overall I don't see much in there that supports your Globalization fears IMO. Case in point; energy independence. REALLY? So no Globalization huh? hhhmmmmmmmmmm



Scholarly articles for WORLD GLOBALIZATION PROOF


One world: The ethics of globalization - ‎Singer - Cited by 1168

Does globalization make the world more unequal? - ‎Lindert - Cited by 497

Globalization myths: some historical reflections on … - ‎Bairoch - Cited by 275

Search Results

The Globalization Website - Issues



sociology.emory.edu/faculty/globalization/issues03.html‎







However, proving a direct link between economic globalization and poverty is a complex ... There is no single measure of integration into the world economy. ... There is ample evidence that the gap between the richest and poorest countries, ...


How Globalization Is Changing the World » Knowledge@Wharton



knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/.../how-globalization-is-changing-the-wo...‎




May 24, 2000 - Globalization is the new fault line on the world's ideological map: ... on your computer screen is some sort of proof that globalization is for real.

[PPT]
Chapter 1 - Globalization



faculty.washington.edu/giambatt/ibus300/.../Globalization%20Ch%201.p...‎







Evidence of Globalization. World trade increased more than: 20x between '50 and '98; 25x from '70 to '02. FDI annual flows increased more than: 10x from '84 to ...


Globalization and Human Rights in the Developing World | Derrick ...



www.academia.edu/.../Globalization_and_Human_Rights_in_the_Develo...‎







PROOF Contents List of Tables Preface Notes on Contributors 1 Introduction Derrick M. Nault vii viii ix 1 Part I Globalization, the State, and Human Rights 2 ...


Understanding Globalisation - ETU



www.etu.org.za › Toolbox › Understanding Development‎







Jump to What evidence exists of globalisation? - ? There is a widely held view that we live today in a world in which economic, political and ...


Globalization's Hidden Benefits - YaleGlobal Online



yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/globalization’s-hidden-benefits‎







Jul 4, 2006 - While some critics malign globalization, increasing evidence suggests ... A few numbers tell the story of the world's march toward globalization:.


Is Globalisation a Myth or a Fact - an essay by Jake Gordon | Jake ...



jakeg.co.uk/essays/globalisation‎







A look at whether globalisation is actually happening or not. ... sees the economically and politically powerful west globalising the rest of the world, ... we are not living in a total global economy and use this as proof that globalisation is a myth.


The Blessings and Challenges of Globalization | Cato Institute



www.cato.org/publications/.../blessings-challenges-globalization‎







by D Griswold - ‎2012 - ‎Cited by 24 - ‎Related articles
The evidence of globalization can be seen everywhere: in the home, in the ... From typical Third World poverty in the 1950s, each has achieved a standard of ...

[PDF]
Effects of Financial Globalization on Developing Countries ... - IMF



www.imf.org/external/np/res/docs/2003/031703.pdf‎







Mar 17, 2003 - C. What Is the Impact of Financial Globalization on Macroeconomic Volatility? .......9 ..... Evidence from Life Expectancy and Infant Mortality .................................................. ...35. 3. .... global capital flows to the developing world. 10.


The Benefits of Globalization



www.radford.edu/~mthong/benefits_of_globalization.htm‎







Globalization has been under a heated debate concerning third world, ... There is remarkable evidence that globalization is helping countries expand and ...

[fj1200]

REALLY? So no Globalization huh? hhhmmmmmmmmmm

I didn't say that there wasn't globalization. Perhaps I should have put more emphasis on the fears part of my post and pointed out your use of "globalists."

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I didn't say that there wasn't globalization. Perhaps I should have put more emphasis on the fears part of my post and pointed out your use of "globalists." If a man suddenly shouts , look out a car and pushes you to safety when the car would have struck you while walking on the sidewalk do you accuse him of his fear or thank him for thinking of your safety as much as he does for his own? Lets get this straight shall we ? I have no great fear of my demise. I have IMHO lived a life that equals any man and surpasses most. Sure , I have no desire to depart early but certainly have not the great fear of the dangers I warn others about. I could never have lived the life I have lived if fear of losing my life was in anyway as prevalent as you seem to think it is. As I have stated many times here my fear is for my kids and grandkids. This 'ole dog has had his day and then some! I will be 60 in three months and lived as much as many that make it to 90... I ran full bore for the better part of 40 years. Just sayin'. I simply do not rate my fear for the lives of others to be a bad thing or an obstacle for me to overcome. And yes, the Globalists are behind Obama and his nation destroying agenda.. --Tyr

[fj1200]

And yes, the Globalists are behind Obama and his nation destroying agenda.. --Tyr

So you're OK with globalization but not the globalists? Is this a basic summary of the Globalist Agenda (http://www.globalistagenda.org/) that you're fighting against?



<tbody>
Their Goals

</tbody>

"The New World Order, although it's not really, it's called the New World Order, it's an old, old idea of having a controlled and planned world society that really is a merger of two systems and that was the Soviet system and the Capitalist system. But out of it is to come an efficient planned society. In other words, eventually down the road everyone who's born will be born only if there is a function for them to serve, and that is the key word to serve - and that is to serve the world state. People have been categorized all through their lives from school onwards from generation after generation into a eugenics program where the elite have long ago decided on who were the junk genes - meaning the commoners at the bottom - will there be a future for them? Well, they don't need them so they are going to eradicate them under the guise of overpopulation. And interestingly enough, because they know most people live their whole lives without an original thought (they really don't - thoughts are downloaded into them, opinions are given to them - they adopt opinions), they must have the consent of the public for this agenda including, down the road very very soon in fact, voluntary sterilization to save poor old mother earth and bring the population down. And when you look at what's been taught scientifically, a scientific socialism you might say, what's being taught even in kindergarten onwards today, they're giving them up towards this world where you'll sacrifice yourself if need be for mother earth. It's a religion of sorts - it uses all of the techniques of religion because religion has worked so well in the past. Michael Gorbachev, who is part of this structure for a global society, said 'We are creating a new world religion and it will be based on a form of earth worship'. By that he meant you will literally live to serve mother earth. Of course Mother Earth has a new priesthood, there's always a priesthood, and you find its the experts, a scientific society, who already have declared they are too superior for the rest of us to be around and they have the natural right - they're the natural aristocracy as they call themselves - but in reality all scientists who depend on grants or funding from the wealthy, the already established wealthy elite, they're just the lackeys of those at the top. At the top of this system you have very old families who've held on and acquired more and more power down through many centuries and they've declared they're at the top of the Darwinian tree and beneath them you have the scientific society that makes the weapons for them, including weapons that will eventually control the mind, and they plan to run the whole world as a planned - not just a planned parenthood society - a planned society where every country which will be subservient to a global government."

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

So you're OK with globalization but not the globalists? Is this a basic summary of the Globalist Agenda (http://www.globalistagenda.org/) that you're fighting against? From previous post by me..

yes, the Globalists are behind Obama and his nation destroying agenda.. --Tyr

[fj1200]

From previous post by me..



<tbody>
Who Are The Globalists?

</tbody>
Simply put, the globalist movement is an alliance based on self-interest of the private international financiers and the royal, dynastic and hereditary land owning families of Britain, Europe and America which over the years have intermarried to create a self regenerating power structure that through lies and deception seeks to control everything and everyone on earth. Through their control of the ability to create money, they are able to exercise control over all the power centers of society including the corporations, the media, culture creation, the educational system, the historical societies, the political system, the military, religion, foundations and other NGOs, medicine, and law. Over time they have extended their network of control to include elites from countries all over the world working towards the same end.

I'm not too worried about them.

[revelarts]

I'm not too worried about them.
has Log gotten to you?
well FJ If you go along with all of the new laws they put down (green, medical, food, one child etc), move to cities or the camps like they say and take the mark of the beast you'll be fine.
no worries. for a awhile at least.
But if you want some national sovereignty, some local control or anything like what the founders called "freedom" then you should be concerned.

Our collective blase' attitude is whats gotten us this far down the road to h3ll, seems to me.
"ever vigilantly" watching our freedoms slip into a globalist totalitarian morass.

[revelarts]

Walter Croncite acceptance speech for the world governance award. With a congrats and 'atta boys' from then 1st lady Hilary Clinton

"It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace.

To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order.

But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen. The circumstances were vastly different, obviously. While the colonies differed on many questions, at least the people of the colonies were of the same Anglo-Saxon stock. Yet just because the task appears forbiddingly hard, we should not shirk it.
We cannot defer this responsibility to posterity. Time will not wait. Democracy, civilization itself, is at stake. Within the next few years we must change the basic structure of our global community from the present anarchic system of war and ever more destructive weaponry to a new system governed by a democratic UN federation.

I suppose I'm preaching to the choir here. So let's not talk generalities but focus tonight on a few specifics of what the leadership of the World Federalist Movement believe must be done now to advance the rule of world law....

Today we must develop federal structures on a global level. We need a system of enforceable world law-- a democratic federal world government--to deal with world problems....

Today the notion of unlimited national sovereignty means international anarchy. We must replace the anarchic law of force with a civilized force of law....

http://www.worldbeyondborders.org/cronkite.htm
"
his remarks above edited out his bit about gladly being at the right hand of the Devil if that's what Global Governance means.


<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/lyFVl99vbyg?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[fj1200]

has Log gotten to you?
well FJ If you go along with all of the new laws they put down (green, medical, food, one child etc), move to cities or the camps like they say and take the mark of the beast you'll be fine.
no worries. for a awhile at least.
But if you want some national sovereignty, some local control or anything like what the founders called "freedom" then you should be concerned.

Our collective blase' attitude is whats gotten us this far down the road to h3ll, seems to me.
"ever vigilantly" watching our freedoms slip into a globalist totalitarian morass.

No, we've pretty much done that to ourselves and it didn't take the myth of the globalists to do it either, just a bunch of domestic citizens who like big government. So there haven't been any "new laws put down" by the UN that have forced any of what is on your list.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Walter Croncite acceptance speech for the world governance award. With a congrats and 'atta boys' from then 1st lady Hilary Clinton

"It seems to many of us that if we are to avoid the eventual catastrophic world conflict we must strengthen the United Nations as a first step toward a world government patterned after our own government with a legislature, executive and judiciary, and police to enforce its international laws and keep the peace.

To do that, of course, we Americans will have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That would be a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith in the new order.

But the American colonies did it once and brought forth one of the most nearly perfect unions the world has ever seen. The circumstances were vastly different, obviously. While the colonies differed on many questions, at least the people of the colonies were of the same Anglo-Saxon stock. Yet just because the task appears forbiddingly hard, we should not shirk it.
We cannot defer this responsibility to posterity. Time will not wait. Democracy, civilization itself, is at stake. Within the next few years we must change the basic structure of our global community from the present anarchic system of war and ever more destructive weaponry to a new system governed by a democratic UN federation.

I suppose I'm preaching to the choir here. So let's not talk generalities but focus tonight on a few specifics of what the leadership of the World Federalist Movement believe must be done now to advance the rule of world law....

Today we must develop federal structures on a global level. We need a system of enforceable world law-- a democratic federal world government--to deal with world problems....

Today the notion of unlimited national sovereignty means international anarchy. We must replace the anarchic law of force with a civilized force of law....

http://www.worldbeyondborders.org/cronkite.htm
"
his remarks above edited out his bit about gladly being at the right hand of the Devil if that's what Global Governance means.


<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/lyFVl99vbyg?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> A great find. One that I was completely unaware of. Not often one gets to see so much honesty in they splaining what they are doing and want to do. However the idea (just like communism) puts forth the concept and leaves out the bitter and savage evils that always come into play to force its acceptance and dominance. Communism has caused the death of over 200 million people since it first came into practice in the modern world. Globalists's _"One World Order" will quite likely exceed that number by at least 4 or 5 fold IMHO. Three things its must seek to destroy to EXIST AND COME TO POWER are 1. the USA, 2. true freedom and 3. the Christian God. I WILL NOT ALLOW ANY OF THOSE IN MY LIFE SO I MUST DIE. That's how they see it. I beg to differ and will not play about it when I do... --Tyr