DragonStryk72
12-02-2013, 03:20 AM
So my dad posted an article on the ACA site going up, with CNN spinning it at working "smoothly", and so I replied:
Me:Well, it's doing much better, but according to CNN, it's still hitting roadblocks, mostly at the final processing step.
This is when the Troll arrived, because how dare I not be 100% in rapture over this:
Him:The negativity is so boring. They are doing THEIR BEST to remedy the situation. How about one of you fix the problem? The site would probably explode.
Me:Well, let's try this a different way: you put your car in for some necessary repairs, and I give you a timeline for when you can pick it up. Instead of it being on time, it is a week late, and when you do get it, you make it almost out of the parking lot when it breaks down again. Now, you have no abilities at car repair, so do you have a right to complain? According to me, you would, as I promised a bill of sale I didn't deliver on, on top of it being delayed. I acknowledged the site was doing better, but better is not good, nor is it smooth. If a certain number of people are having their personal information disappear into the internet, that seems kind of rough. All sites have difficulties, and I get that, but this is all stuff that should have been tested in both Alpha and Beta. That's why those processes exist, to red-line the system so that it's properly ready to go from day 1.
Him: Well, let's try this a different way. Have you ever worked on a computer help desk? I have.
Me: I've worked as a Beta Tester. Next Question? Please stop judging I'm an idiot without knowing anything about me. You'll find it stays as a debate and not an argument that way.
Him: I'm not the person judging. You are. Whether it was test or not you do not know. All I see is a pissy fit. Negative people always complaining about something instead of being in the solution.
You want to help. Stop whining and send in some suggestions Mr. Beta Tester. LOL.
Me: lol, omg, seriously? wow.... just wow. So, I post a legitimate disagreement, and even admit that the site is much improved, but does still have significant issues. That's your definition of "pissy"? And you did judge, every time that you've posted thus far, you've been judging me. I noted one point of error that is provably existent, and that's "pissy" now? In fact, I think the only one here who has leveled any form of insult or judgment is you, which is of course, extremely negative, which in turn shows a core of hypocrisy in your entire stance.
Then he decided to message me:
Him: I was just about to defriend you. THANK YOU for saving me the bother. If someone disagreeing with you is all it takes, that shows me the kind of person you are.
Okay, so first off, I wasn't his friend on facebook to start with, so I don't know where he got that. Second, from one sentence to the next in this message, it is directly hypocritical. He's going to defriend me because I disagreed with him, but is pissed because he thinks I would defriend him due to him disagreeing with me.
God, it was priceless, lol.
Me:Well, it's doing much better, but according to CNN, it's still hitting roadblocks, mostly at the final processing step.
This is when the Troll arrived, because how dare I not be 100% in rapture over this:
Him:The negativity is so boring. They are doing THEIR BEST to remedy the situation. How about one of you fix the problem? The site would probably explode.
Me:Well, let's try this a different way: you put your car in for some necessary repairs, and I give you a timeline for when you can pick it up. Instead of it being on time, it is a week late, and when you do get it, you make it almost out of the parking lot when it breaks down again. Now, you have no abilities at car repair, so do you have a right to complain? According to me, you would, as I promised a bill of sale I didn't deliver on, on top of it being delayed. I acknowledged the site was doing better, but better is not good, nor is it smooth. If a certain number of people are having their personal information disappear into the internet, that seems kind of rough. All sites have difficulties, and I get that, but this is all stuff that should have been tested in both Alpha and Beta. That's why those processes exist, to red-line the system so that it's properly ready to go from day 1.
Him: Well, let's try this a different way. Have you ever worked on a computer help desk? I have.
Me: I've worked as a Beta Tester. Next Question? Please stop judging I'm an idiot without knowing anything about me. You'll find it stays as a debate and not an argument that way.
Him: I'm not the person judging. You are. Whether it was test or not you do not know. All I see is a pissy fit. Negative people always complaining about something instead of being in the solution.
You want to help. Stop whining and send in some suggestions Mr. Beta Tester. LOL.
Me: lol, omg, seriously? wow.... just wow. So, I post a legitimate disagreement, and even admit that the site is much improved, but does still have significant issues. That's your definition of "pissy"? And you did judge, every time that you've posted thus far, you've been judging me. I noted one point of error that is provably existent, and that's "pissy" now? In fact, I think the only one here who has leveled any form of insult or judgment is you, which is of course, extremely negative, which in turn shows a core of hypocrisy in your entire stance.
Then he decided to message me:
Him: I was just about to defriend you. THANK YOU for saving me the bother. If someone disagreeing with you is all it takes, that shows me the kind of person you are.
Okay, so first off, I wasn't his friend on facebook to start with, so I don't know where he got that. Second, from one sentence to the next in this message, it is directly hypocritical. He's going to defriend me because I disagreed with him, but is pissed because he thinks I would defriend him due to him disagreeing with me.
God, it was priceless, lol.