Obama Administration Suppresses Photos: Press Ignites in Protest

[Jeff]

Wow is this guy full of himself, now he will decide what pictures may be published :laugh: Talk about Micro Managing .







A photographer from the New York Times (NYT) has a stack of pictures that were taken at official events at the White House involving President Obama; however these pictures are not allow (http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/11/21/obama-white-house-photographers-correspondents-association/3662677/) to be made public.
Indeed, it has become obvious that “journalists are routinely being denied the right to photograph or videotape the President while he is performing his official duties.”




http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/11/obama-administration-suppresses-photos-press-ignites-protest/

[Larrymc]

Wow is this guy full of himself, now he will decide what pictures may be published :laugh: Talk about Micro Managing .







http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/11/obama-administration-suppresses-photos-press-ignites-protest/This simply can't be true from the Most Transparent Administration. :rolleyes:

[Arbo]

Wow is this guy full of himself, now he will decide what pictures may be published :laugh: Talk about Micro Managing .


I'm pretty sure that legally they can't to shit to those that take or publish photos.

[Jeff]

I'm pretty sure that legally they can't to shit to those that take or publish photos.

I think you are right , I now with any type of picture sent into a magazine as long as the picture was of someone of age and it was taken in public it is fair game , now if it was taken in private then you must have a release form signed , so if that is correct anything he does while conducting official business should be fair game, but that doesn't mean this administration has to like it and that can cause a lot of trouble for ya .