PDA

View Full Version : Total number of ObamaCare website enrollments on launch day was … six people



red states rule
11-01-2013, 02:27 AM
Oh my, so much for Obama's crowning achievement


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57610328/obamacare-early-enrollment-numbers-very-small-documents-show/





CBS News) WASHINGTON - For 31 days now, the Obama administration has been telling us that Americans by the millions (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57608456/obama-no-sugar-coating-problems-with-healthcare.gov/) are visiting the new health insurance website (http://www.cbsnews.com/feature/obamacare/), despite all its problems.
But no one in the administration has been willing to tell us how many policies have been purchased, and this may be the reason: CBS News has learned enrollments got off to an incredibly slow start.

Early enrollment figures are contained in notes from twice-a-day "war room" meetings convened within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services after the website failed on Oct. 1. They were turned over in response to a document request from the House Oversight Committee.

The website launched on a Tuesday. Publicly, the government said there were 4.7 million unique visits in the first 24 hours. But at a meeting Wednesday morning, the war room notes say "six enrollments have occurred so far."

They were with BlueCross BlueShield North Carolina and Kansas City, CareSource and Healthcare Service Corporation.

By Wednesday afternoon, enrollments were up to "approximately 100." By the end of Wednesday, the notes reflect "248 enrollments" nationwide.

red states rule
11-01-2013, 04:12 PM
When it comes to the liberal media R's are too blame for everything





What an odious piece of garbage. Today's Politico, in an article (http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/the-obamacare-sabotage-campaign-99176.html)by Todd Purdum, accuses Republicans of "calculated sabotage" of Obamacare, comparing their opposition to the "pattern of 'massive resistance' not seen since the Southern states’ defiance of the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954."

Purdum himself seems to recognize just how loony he comes off, writing "[t]hat may sound like a left-wing conspiracy theory . . . But there is a strong factual basis for such a charge." Sabotage, really? People who understand democracy would call it entirely legitimate opposition to a philosophy and a program that millions of Americans believe undermine what this country should be about. More after the jump.


http://newsbusters.org/sites/default/files/main_photos/2013/November/segregationists.jpg?1383313134Every time Democrats united to sink a Republican plan during a GOP presidency, was that also "sabotage" in Purdum's opinion? Does he expect Republicans to go willingly along with a program whose rollout has demonstrated the truth of predictions that it would be a "train wreck"? Does Politico continue to hold itself out as an objective organization when it hires the likes of Purdum--former Vanity Fair and New York Times writer, married to Dee Dee Myers, and let him slime libel Republicans in such an absurd manner?



Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2013/11/01/politico-accuses-republicans-sabotaging-obamacare-segregationists-#ixzz2jQlKieeb

red states rule
11-05-2013, 03:51 AM
http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/12_13967220131104065012.jpg