Alik Bahshi
09-19-2013, 07:53 AM
Alik Bahshi<o:p></o
Monotheism is Evil,separating the human race<o:p></o
In the beginning, I want to be defined; I am not an atheist,but not a supporter of any particular religious denomination. Rather dualist,on the assumption that matter and mind in the universe are in harmony and cannot exist one without the other.<o:p></o An interesting observation, if you're an atheist,the believer to you, as a rule, indifferent, but if you are a believer, but other faiths, you have an enemy. Even stronger hardening causes the believer monotheist representative of other areas of the same denomination, such as the feud between Catholics and Protestants, Sunnis and Shiites. Zealous madly toward God among believers is characteristic of monotheism since its inception,and, unfortunately, to a greater or lesser extent, remains to this day. Even inthe inner sanctum of Christianity - Jerusalem Holy Sepulcher religious fanatic sare not satisfied with the slaughter rarely without dividing among them selves the one God (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q88iQE6_t-c (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q88iQE6_t-c)). Or here's another fine example of "universal love" to the one God extended to Jewish orthodoxy, painted in Hebrew worship cross set inUman (Ukraine) in honor of the1025th anniversary of Orthodoxy. ( (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)http (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Itshould)://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/ (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Its))<o:p></o (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Its)Itshould (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Its) be noted that such religious in tolerance era of polytheism did not know. It seems that the diversity among the many idols and their free choice allowed the society to be more tolerant, and religious ideology did not have that ruthlesssuppression of other world powers up to the physical destruction of the individual, as it was in monotheism, especially in the era of medieval obscurantism. By the way, and democracy, as we know, the first time it appeared in the ancient world.It is safe to assume that not a fraction of misfortunes had a sip of Humanity with the belief in a single God. In any case, the history of paganism does not know the endless religious wars.<o:p></o
I do not think people become more humane after reviewing the allegedly given to him by God's 10 commandments? If, however, be more consistent and punctual in the Biblical legend, all these commandments originally were given to the Jewish people. And , following the prescriptions of religious sources of Judaism, the Torah and the Talmud, it appears that bans"do not kill ", " thou shalt not steal “, " Do not commitadultery ," and other relate only to the Jews, and are not subject to the goyim (all other peoples), that is have legal force only in the medium of God'schosen people. This raze question arises, not because if everything God has given charge of all these things is to Jews as the most prone to such abuse. It does not matter to a misunderstanding or deliberately, but is a warning over the Jews interpreted as exclusivity, and raised himself to God's chosen people.<o:p></o
In short, you can definitely say that belief in one God, when it can notbe divided among them religious fanatics was an insurmountable barrier thatdivided humanity and all attempts to destroy this ideological barrier is doomedto failure.<o:p></o In recent years, a trend the use of religious in tolerance for political purposes. So does Israel, translating, struggle of the Palestinian people for freedom and independence in the mainstream of religious hatred, calling the Palestinian Islamists or even more sharply by Islamic terrorists,but Islam is no direct relationship to the struggle has not. Thus, by analogy,for example, and the British would call the Indian independence fighters Buddhists or Buddhist terrorists. Russia to disavow the national liberation movement in Chechnya and Dagestan, also found the cause of Islam. In an effort to hide from the international community the real causes of today's terrorismand deflect blame for his appearance, interested parties, using short cuts,replace true with false notions (see "International terrorism and itsinterested parties
You tell me, because the Chechens were burned Russian tanks on the streets ofGrozny, shouting "Allah is great", which indicates the relationshipwith Islam , but then the Russian World War I threw in a bayonet charge with acry of " God with us ", and the same Christian God that of the enemy.If, in the beginning, the Kremlin called Chechen guerrilla fighters, later they became Islamic terrorists and Wahhabis. In the Caucasus, there were even the messengers of Al Qaeda that all nonsense, because Al Qaeda is an Arab organization leading the fight against America and Israel. Is not reflect the policy of the Kremlin, which invariably has always been on the side of the Arabs? Remember how the Kremlin openly against Israel and America hosted a delegation of Hamas in Gaza, but the Israeli definition of Hamas are also Islamists. It turns out that there are good and there are Islamists Islamists are bad and how it is consistent with the source - Islam.
<o:p></o In short, the interested parties of Islamic terrorism in Moscow and Tel Aviv, which themselves together as strategic adversaries can hardly intelligibly explain this absurdity. But out of all this, an important conclusion, namely, the desire of interested parties to use religious ideology for political purposes. Evil, multiplied by the Evil poses agreat threat and opens a Pandora's Box from which you will start to spread hatred for Peace religious fanaticism, which can actually lead to aconfrontation of civilizations, and it is this and intimidate the world community of interested parties from Moscow and Tel Aviv. Moreover, this fact skillfully uses bigots from Tehran, which position themselves as the true defenders of the Faith from the machinations of Satan (by default - Democracy). Nuclear truncheons in their hands will be good for such a help charitable affairs,and the desire to find it, of course, is justified in the eyes of religious fanatic.<o:p></o<o:p></o In the religious aspect of the Islamist it is necessary to understand the religious fanatic who professes Islam. By analog, a Jew - is a fanatic follower of Judaism. Why fanatic,because even ready to give his life for the faith, or someone to take the life for her. May be the fact that Islam is less tolerant, more war like against infidels? Again, no, Islam is not better, but certainly not worse than Christianity, if you remember how in the early days of Christianity destroyed ancient temples. After all, Christianity has destroyed the ancient culture.Forgotten were brought works of ancient thinkers, philosophers and scientists.Fire and Sword implanted Christianity in America, Africa and Polynesia. Justthe era of the Crusades is worth something! But the age of medieval obscurantism with sophisticated torture Inquisition! In the end, the two world wars that claimed millions of lives, too, for Christians depend. Or Judaism with his misanthropic ideology of the chosen people, in comparison with which everything else is goi Humanity, the only reason for the existence of which is a ministry to the Jews, on the grounds that "The difference between Jew and Gentileis so large that it pales in comparison to the difference between human and animal» (http://www.hofesh.org.il/haredim_papers/01/1201.html (http://www.hofesh.org.il/haredim_papers/01/1201.html) ).<o:p></o Tell me, what these Talmudic conclusions differ from the ideology of racism? And, while in Christianity and Islam, and there is nothing close to this, all the monotheistic faiths in common - animplacable hatred for each other, which is the source for unscrupulous politicians.Religion, though, and proclaims the virtue, in fact, includes an element of discord.<o:p></o
In democratic countries the separation of religion and state, and this is one of the important features of democracy.Countries where there are religious parties , where priests, the ayatollahs, rabbis and other religious officials from taking part in the government, apriori, cannot be considered democratic. Faith and Democracy - are in compatible, and an example to countries such as Iran and Israel (1, 2). <o:p></o
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
Monotheism is Evil,separating the human race<o:p></o
In the beginning, I want to be defined; I am not an atheist,but not a supporter of any particular religious denomination. Rather dualist,on the assumption that matter and mind in the universe are in harmony and cannot exist one without the other.<o:p></o An interesting observation, if you're an atheist,the believer to you, as a rule, indifferent, but if you are a believer, but other faiths, you have an enemy. Even stronger hardening causes the believer monotheist representative of other areas of the same denomination, such as the feud between Catholics and Protestants, Sunnis and Shiites. Zealous madly toward God among believers is characteristic of monotheism since its inception,and, unfortunately, to a greater or lesser extent, remains to this day. Even inthe inner sanctum of Christianity - Jerusalem Holy Sepulcher religious fanatic sare not satisfied with the slaughter rarely without dividing among them selves the one God (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q88iQE6_t-c (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q88iQE6_t-c)). Or here's another fine example of "universal love" to the one God extended to Jewish orthodoxy, painted in Hebrew worship cross set inUman (Ukraine) in honor of the1025th anniversary of Orthodoxy. ( (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)http (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Itshould)://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/ (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Its))<o:p></o (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Its)Itshould (http://lenta.ru/news/2013/08/20/krest/)>>Its) be noted that such religious in tolerance era of polytheism did not know. It seems that the diversity among the many idols and their free choice allowed the society to be more tolerant, and religious ideology did not have that ruthlesssuppression of other world powers up to the physical destruction of the individual, as it was in monotheism, especially in the era of medieval obscurantism. By the way, and democracy, as we know, the first time it appeared in the ancient world.It is safe to assume that not a fraction of misfortunes had a sip of Humanity with the belief in a single God. In any case, the history of paganism does not know the endless religious wars.<o:p></o
I do not think people become more humane after reviewing the allegedly given to him by God's 10 commandments? If, however, be more consistent and punctual in the Biblical legend, all these commandments originally were given to the Jewish people. And , following the prescriptions of religious sources of Judaism, the Torah and the Talmud, it appears that bans"do not kill ", " thou shalt not steal “, " Do not commitadultery ," and other relate only to the Jews, and are not subject to the goyim (all other peoples), that is have legal force only in the medium of God'schosen people. This raze question arises, not because if everything God has given charge of all these things is to Jews as the most prone to such abuse. It does not matter to a misunderstanding or deliberately, but is a warning over the Jews interpreted as exclusivity, and raised himself to God's chosen people.<o:p></o
In short, you can definitely say that belief in one God, when it can notbe divided among them religious fanatics was an insurmountable barrier thatdivided humanity and all attempts to destroy this ideological barrier is doomedto failure.<o:p></o In recent years, a trend the use of religious in tolerance for political purposes. So does Israel, translating, struggle of the Palestinian people for freedom and independence in the mainstream of religious hatred, calling the Palestinian Islamists or even more sharply by Islamic terrorists,but Islam is no direct relationship to the struggle has not. Thus, by analogy,for example, and the British would call the Indian independence fighters Buddhists or Buddhist terrorists. Russia to disavow the national liberation movement in Chechnya and Dagestan, also found the cause of Islam. In an effort to hide from the international community the real causes of today's terrorismand deflect blame for his appearance, interested parties, using short cuts,replace true with false notions (see "International terrorism and itsinterested parties
You tell me, because the Chechens were burned Russian tanks on the streets ofGrozny, shouting "Allah is great", which indicates the relationshipwith Islam , but then the Russian World War I threw in a bayonet charge with acry of " God with us ", and the same Christian God that of the enemy.If, in the beginning, the Kremlin called Chechen guerrilla fighters, later they became Islamic terrorists and Wahhabis. In the Caucasus, there were even the messengers of Al Qaeda that all nonsense, because Al Qaeda is an Arab organization leading the fight against America and Israel. Is not reflect the policy of the Kremlin, which invariably has always been on the side of the Arabs? Remember how the Kremlin openly against Israel and America hosted a delegation of Hamas in Gaza, but the Israeli definition of Hamas are also Islamists. It turns out that there are good and there are Islamists Islamists are bad and how it is consistent with the source - Islam.
<o:p></o In short, the interested parties of Islamic terrorism in Moscow and Tel Aviv, which themselves together as strategic adversaries can hardly intelligibly explain this absurdity. But out of all this, an important conclusion, namely, the desire of interested parties to use religious ideology for political purposes. Evil, multiplied by the Evil poses agreat threat and opens a Pandora's Box from which you will start to spread hatred for Peace religious fanaticism, which can actually lead to aconfrontation of civilizations, and it is this and intimidate the world community of interested parties from Moscow and Tel Aviv. Moreover, this fact skillfully uses bigots from Tehran, which position themselves as the true defenders of the Faith from the machinations of Satan (by default - Democracy). Nuclear truncheons in their hands will be good for such a help charitable affairs,and the desire to find it, of course, is justified in the eyes of religious fanatic.<o:p></o<o:p></o In the religious aspect of the Islamist it is necessary to understand the religious fanatic who professes Islam. By analog, a Jew - is a fanatic follower of Judaism. Why fanatic,because even ready to give his life for the faith, or someone to take the life for her. May be the fact that Islam is less tolerant, more war like against infidels? Again, no, Islam is not better, but certainly not worse than Christianity, if you remember how in the early days of Christianity destroyed ancient temples. After all, Christianity has destroyed the ancient culture.Forgotten were brought works of ancient thinkers, philosophers and scientists.Fire and Sword implanted Christianity in America, Africa and Polynesia. Justthe era of the Crusades is worth something! But the age of medieval obscurantism with sophisticated torture Inquisition! In the end, the two world wars that claimed millions of lives, too, for Christians depend. Or Judaism with his misanthropic ideology of the chosen people, in comparison with which everything else is goi Humanity, the only reason for the existence of which is a ministry to the Jews, on the grounds that "The difference between Jew and Gentileis so large that it pales in comparison to the difference between human and animal» (http://www.hofesh.org.il/haredim_papers/01/1201.html (http://www.hofesh.org.il/haredim_papers/01/1201.html) ).<o:p></o Tell me, what these Talmudic conclusions differ from the ideology of racism? And, while in Christianity and Islam, and there is nothing close to this, all the monotheistic faiths in common - animplacable hatred for each other, which is the source for unscrupulous politicians.Religion, though, and proclaims the virtue, in fact, includes an element of discord.<o:p></o
In democratic countries the separation of religion and state, and this is one of the important features of democracy.Countries where there are religious parties , where priests, the ayatollahs, rabbis and other religious officials from taking part in the government, apriori, cannot be considered democratic. Faith and Democracy - are in compatible, and an example to countries such as Iran and Israel (1, 2). <o:p></o
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->