PDA

View Full Version : A Plea for Caution From Russia



Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
09-12-2013, 09:06 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/opinion/putin-plea-for-caution-from-russia-on-syria.html?pagewanted=all
By VLADIMIR V. PUTIN

Published: September 11, 2013 820 Comments
MOSCOW — RECENT events surrounding Syria have prompted me to speak directly to the American people and their political leaders. It is important to do so at a time of insufficient communication between our societies.

Relations between us have passed through different stages. We stood against each other during the cold war. But we were also allies once, and defeated the Nazis together. The universal international organization — the United Nations — was then established to prevent such devastation from ever happening again.

The United Nations’ founders understood that decisions affecting war and peace should happen only by consensus, and with America’s consent the veto by Security Council permanent members was enshrined in the United Nations Charter. The profound wisdom of this has underpinned the stability of international relations for decades.

No one wants the United Nations to suffer the fate of the League of Nations, which collapsed because it lacked real leverage. This is possible if influential countries bypass the United Nations and take military action without Security Council authorization.

The potential strike by the United States against Syria, despite strong opposition from many countries and major political and religious leaders, including the pope, will result in more innocent victims and escalation, potentially spreading the conflict far beyond Syria’s borders. A strike would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism. It could undermine multilateral efforts to resolve the Iranian nuclear problem and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and further destabilize the Middle East and North Africa. It could throw the entire system of international law and order out of balance.

Syria is not witnessing a battle for democracy, but an armed conflict between government and opposition in a multireligious country. There are few champions of democracy in Syria. But there are more than enough Qaeda fighters and extremists of all stripes battling the government. The United States State Department has designated Al Nusra Front and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, fighting with the opposition, as terrorist organizations. This internal conflict, fueled by foreign weapons supplied to the opposition, is one of the bloodiest in the world.

P.Kersey
09-12-2013, 09:11 AM
Putin shows a realistic worldview here.

Kathianne
09-12-2013, 09:12 AM
Topic of the day!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/09/12/10-reasons-why-its-now-worse/


10 reasons why it’s now worse By Jennifer Rubin (http://www.washingtonpost.com/jennifer-rubin/2011/02/24/ABbIUXN_page.html), Published: September 12 at 8:45 am

President Obama had gotten himself into quite a bind going into his Tuesday night speech on Syria. But he made things much worse because of an incoherent speech, which even former officials (http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/09/11/wishful_thinking_two_alternative_obama_syria_speec hes?page=0,0)are blasting. Here are at least 10 reasons why things are now worse:

1. His Russia gambit lost whatever conservative support he had built up for a strike on Syria.


2. We are now at Vladimir Putin’s mercy (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/world/europe/as-obama-pauses-action-putin-takes-center-stage.html?hp&_r=0&gwh=F2580AD0782953B39DB57B4C62F9D724), which he is already exploiting skillfully. The Russian despot took to the pages of the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/opinion/putin-plea-for-caution-from-russia-on-syria.html?pagewanted=all)to deplore American exceptionalism and to denounce potential U.S. action. (He used the same “the rebels are all jihadists” claptrap that American isolationists use.) He accused the rebels of using the chemical weapons, an ominous sign for a chemical weapons exchange. Even worse was the pathetic U.S. response (http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/09/11/white-house-responds-to-putins-nyt-op-ed/): “That’s all irrelevant. He put this proposal forward and he’s now invested in it. That’s good. That’s the best possible reaction. He’s fully invested in Syria’s CW disarmament and that’s potentially better than a military strike — which would deter and degrade but would’t get rid of all the chemical weapons. He now owns this. He has fully asserted ownership of it and he needs to deliver.” This is delusional and frightening, to be blunt. Obama’s international humiliation will continue.


3. The media figured out quickly the Russia gambit is ridiculous and therefore is unlikely to treat the morass to follow as anything other than Obama’s fault.


4. There is no pro-Russia or pro-United Nations constituency to speak of in this country; putting our national security interests in these peoples’ hands isn’t likely to endear him to the public, Congress or foreign policy professionals.

...



http://washingtonexaminer.com/democratic-senator-says-he-almost-vomited-after-reading-vladimir-putins-op-ed/article/2535655


Democratic senator says he almost vomited after reading Vladimir Putin's op-ed By CHARLIE SPIERING (http://washingtonexaminer.com/AUTHOR/CHARLIE-SPIERING) | SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 AT 8:04 AM

...

http://washingtonexaminer.com/obamas-wing-it-diplomacy-undermines-us-credibility/article/2535620


Obama's wing-it diplomacy undermines US credibility By MICHAEL BARONE (http://washingtonexaminer.com/AUTHOR/MICHAEL-BARONE) | SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 AT 6:40 PM

...

Kathianne
09-12-2013, 12:20 PM
Rush devoted most of his first hour to this. LOL!