PDA

View Full Version : Rape and killing of one of Obama’s daughters should the United States attack Syria



jimnyc
09-06-2013, 10:29 AM
WTF? Seriously? I don't care just how backwards a country is - this is WAY out of line, if true.


As Congress debates whether to support President Obama’s call for a limited strike against Syria for the alleged use of chemical weapons, Iran is vowing to back Bashar al-Assad’s regime to the hilt and threatening to unleash terrorism should the U.S. strike.

Qassem Soleimani, the head of Iran’s Quds Forces, Wednesday told the Assembly of Experts — the body that chooses the supreme leader — that “[w]e will support Syria to the end.”

And in an unprecedented statement, a former Iranian official has warned of mass abductions and brutal killings of American citizens around the world and the rape and killing of one of Obama’s daughters should the United States attack Syria.

Alireza Forghani, the former governor of southern Iran’s Kish Province, threw down the gauntlet last week. Forghani is an analyst and strategy specialist in the supreme leader’s camp and closely aligned with Mehdi Taeb, who heads the regime’s Ammar Strategic Base, a radical think thank, and thus speaks with the blessing of the Islamic regime.

“Hopefully Obama will be pigheaded enough to attack Syria, and then we will see the … loss of U.S. interests [through terrorist attacks],” he threatened. “In just 21 hours [after the attack on Syria], a family member of every U.S. minister [department secretary], U.S. ambassadors, U.S. military commanders around the world will be abducted. And then 18 hours later, videos of their amputation will be spread [around the world].”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/05/iran-threatens-brutal-attacks-on-americans-obama-family-if-us-hits-syria/#ixzz2e7vYFfd5

Kathianne
09-06-2013, 10:34 AM
WTF? Seriously? I don't care just how backwards a country is - this is WAY out of line, if true.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/05/iran-threatens-brutal-attacks-on-americans-obama-family-if-us-hits-syria/#ixzz2e7vYFfd5

Hey, the Iranians and N. Korean leaders are the only leaders that spout more bellicose language than Obama.

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
09-06-2013, 10:36 AM
WTF? Seriously? I don't care just how backwards a country is - this is WAY out of line, if true.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/09/05/iran-threatens-brutal-attacks-on-americans-obama-family-if-us-hits-syria/#ixzz2e7vYFfd5 Totally unacceptable threats. Dude should be drone hit and the sooner the better. I hate Obama myself but threats against us, our nation and his family should receive the proper treatment. Sounds like to me that somebody wants to insure that bampunk fires off those missiles ! --Tyr

aboutime
09-07-2013, 12:47 PM
Totally unacceptable threats. Dude should be drone hit and the sooner the better. I hate Obama myself but threats against us, our nation and his family should receive the proper treatment. Sounds like to me that somebody wants to insure that bampunk fires off those missiles ! --Tyr

I see this as just another kind of Liberal, Obama, Democrat justification for Obama to strike in Syria, and....IRAN with drones.

This justification would be reasoned, pardoned, and excused the same way the Libs claimed Bush II was after Saddam for the attempted assassination of G.H.W. Bush.

We'll hear something like "W used that excuse to go after Saddam. So Obama can use it since they threatened his Daughter(s) too! That makes it a FINE, and DANDY excuse, or reason we need!"

Arbo
09-07-2013, 12:54 PM
This says it better:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/09/is-this-why-obama-decided-to-go-to-congress.php



President Obama did not seek Congressional approval for military action against Libya, and until last weekend, he was firmly on course to order some sort of reprisal against the Assad regime in Syria without going to Congress. Then, on Saturday, August 31, Obama suddenly and unexpectedly reversed course, announcing that he would ” seek authorization for the use of force from the American people’s representatives in Congress.” Since then, there has been much speculation as to why Obama changed his mind.

...



Isn’t this the most plausible explanation of why Obama changed his mind about Congress? If sending a few cruise missiles into Syria was a symbolic act, without serious consequences, like blowing up an aspirin factory in Sudan, then Obama was happy to go it alone. But if there was a possibility of major blowback, not just from an isolated terrorist or two but coordinated by Tehran, the situation would have seemed entirely different. In the event of a significant retaliatory response, Obama would not want to be out on a limb by himself on Syria. Rather, he would want it to be clear that the Syrian intervention was a decision for which the entire U.S. government was responsible, including some Republicans (like, say, John McCain). This conclusion is even stronger, given the risk that a significant retaliation traceable to Iran would escalate tensions with that nation and could lead to a broader and far more substantial conflict. In this event, Obama most certainly would not want to be seen to have triggered the conflagration by himself.

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
09-07-2013, 01:11 PM
This says it better:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2013/09/is-this-why-obama-decided-to-go-to-congress.php



...



[/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT] I agree that certainly puts the OP linked article to shame. I think Jim was just a bit lazy on giving us a good link. I'm thinking about reporting him ... :laugh:--Tyr