View Full Version : Muslim father 'murdered his THREE daughters in honour killing for dating wrong boys'
Marcus Aurelius
07-01-2013, 07:59 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061842/Mohammad-Shafia-murdered-daughter-honour-killing-said-hed-again.html
A Muslim father charged with murdering his three daughters in apparent honour killings has said he would do it again - even if they came back to life 100 times.
Mohammad Shafia, 58, cursed his daughters Zainab, 19, Sahar, 17, and Geeti, 13, saying they were 'treacherous' as he likened them to prostitutes during a conversation that was recorded by police.
He is on trial for their murders after they were found dead in the family car along with Shafia's first wife, Rona Amir, 50, in the Rideau Canal, located in the Kingston area of Ontario in Canada in 2009.
He said: 'Even if, God forbid, they hoist us on to the gallows... we accept it wholeheartedly', a day after his arrest.
The court heard the recordings in which Shafia talks about his daughters and the fact that they were dating while ranting about the family's honour.
He said: 'Even if, God forbid, they hoist us on to the gallows... we accept it wholeheartedly', a day after his arrest.
The court heard the recordings in which Shafia talks about his daughters and the fact that they were dating while ranting about the family's honour.
Nope... never happened right, Jahil?
aboutime
07-07-2013, 07:56 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061842/Mohammad-Shafia-murdered-daughter-honour-killing-said-hed-again.html
Nope... never happened right, Jahil?
Jafar must deny such things happen, or take place. In order for it to take place...according to Jafar. It must be Honour driven, and from what I have seen of Jafar. He has no idea what the word Honor, or Honour means. Why should he if he has None?
Marcus Aurelius
07-07-2013, 09:30 PM
Jafar must deny such things happen, or take place. In order for it to take place...according to Jafar. It must be Honour driven, and from what I have seen of Jafar. He has no idea what the word Honor, or Honour means. Why should he if he has None?
Jahil looked, could not find a way NOT to blame a Muslim, so didn't post. Typical.
Actually it looks as though he hasn't even been to this thread
Yes if and when he finds it I will be looking forward to see his reply they never seem to surprise me :laugh:
Marcus Aurelius
07-08-2013, 07:35 AM
Actually it looks as though he hasn't even been to this thread
Yes if and when he finds it I will be looking forward to see his reply they never seem to surprise me :laugh:
Members who have read this thread: 8
Gaffer (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?23-Gaffer),
jafar00 (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?252-jafar00), (I call him Jahil)
Jeff (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?1539-Jeff),
revelarts (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?1760-revelarts),
Voted4Reagan (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2278-Voted4Reagan),
Marcus Aurelius (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2436-Marcus-Aurelius),
Alik Bahshi (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2625-Alik-Bahshi)
Voted4Reagan
07-08-2013, 08:33 AM
Murdering scum.... he deserves a slow torturous death.....
How about Stoning? With really small rocks?
Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
07-08-2013, 10:17 AM
Islam teaches such murdering is holy. The father is wrong in every sense of the word except the Islamic religious sense. And that so highlights to us the evil of Islam that it must be denied. We in the West only read about a small number of the cases because the others are not reported. In the smaller cities and villages they are ignored because it is Koranic law and it is the norm. -Tyr
jafar00
07-08-2013, 04:28 PM
Murdering scum.... he deserves a slow torturous death.....
How about Stoning? With really small rocks?
Agreed. Though death by paper cuts would be more fitting.
Voted4Reagan
07-08-2013, 05:26 PM
Waterboard him till he drowns
Members who have read this thread: 8
Gaffer (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?23-Gaffer),
jafar00 (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?252-jafar00), (I call him Jahil)
Jeff (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?1539-Jeff),
revelarts (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?1760-revelarts),
Voted4Reagan (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2278-Voted4Reagan),
Marcus Aurelius (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2436-Marcus-Aurelius),
Alik Bahshi (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?2625-Alik-Bahshi)
OK the name Jahil threw me off :laugh: but it looks like he fooled us both if he is serious with the paper cuts and I believe he is , Kudos to jafar00
jafar00
07-08-2013, 10:06 PM
Waterboard him till he drowns
That isn't harmful. Just ask your government. :poke:
That isn't harmful. Just ask your government. :poke:
Dang buddy just when I started to get some faith in ya , water boarding a few animals to save lives is exactly what we needed to do and we did it and no none of those animals died , they may have sh*t there pants but they are still breathing now lets talk about what happens to our men over there , I can honestly say I would much rather be water boarded than beheaded
jafar00
07-09-2013, 06:37 AM
Dang buddy just when I started to get some faith in ya , water boarding a few animals to save lives is exactly what we needed to do and we did it and no none of those animals died , they may have sh*t there pants but they are still breathing now lets talk about what happens to our men over there , I can honestly say I would much rather be water boarded than beheaded
It's still torture. Using it puts you in the same boat as Pol Pot.
Your enemy may not play by anyone's rules but it doesn't excuse your government descending into that gutter.
Voted4Reagan
07-09-2013, 06:41 AM
That isn't harmful. Just ask your government. :poke:
are you also taking that position Jafar?? That it isn't harmful?:poke:
It's still torture. Using it puts you in the same boat as Pol Pot.
Your enemy may not play by anyone's rules but it doesn't excuse your government descending into that gutter.
Jafar when a group of terrorist attack us ( no not a army ) we have every right to do anything we can to get the truth from them
jafar00
07-09-2013, 02:25 PM
Jafar when a group of terrorist attack us ( no not a army ) we have every right to do anything we can to get the truth from them
So you decide to torture them when this --> http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0204/p01s04-wome.html had a 98% success rate. Pumping money and support into such programs would have been more intelligent and a more efficient use of resources instead of finding more painful and depraved ways of torturing these wayward human beings would it not?
Is evidence gathered by torture still inadmissible in a court of law, or did they change that one when we weren't looking?
aboutime
07-13-2013, 08:38 PM
jafar is now back to repeating everything he has said previously as accusations, and lies he is programmed to repeat in order to hide behind his unquestionable hatred for anyone who DOES NOT LOOK LIKE HIM.
He would fit in perfectly at the Zimmerman trial in Florida. Birds of a Feather....Works.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.