Stalin phenomenon

[Alik Bahshi]

Alik Bahshi
Stalin phenomenon

Josef Stalin (Dzhugashvili)personality is very unique in many criteria, primarily in the field ofpsychology. With a natural gift of understanding of the people, Stalin, likex-ray machine to read minds, seeing the man through and through, knowing thepros and cons of all those with whom you have dealt with a strong devious mindallowed him to use all the twists, goals and plans surrounding the many leadersof the revolution, to build a more cunning scheme of physical elimination, notonly rivals, but also all the possible contenders for power. He could not speakwell, he could ignite the crowd fiery speech as Trotsky or Rykov, but he's likea spider waiting, waiting for unsuspecting prey will be in his web. And notinfrequently the victim and took part in the construction of the web. CouldTrotsky (Bronstein), fully-developed intellectual, skillful orator, who hadconcentrated in the hands of the military power, to assume that this dork,Georgians, bad speaking in Russian, a former terrorist-robber hold him as aboy. In relations with people, Stalin never made a single mistake on the way topower, and being on top of it. And he spent Roosevelt and Churchill, andentirely dependent on the supply of materiel and military actions of Americaand England! Stalin was able to bargain with them in Tehran and Yalta ancestralterritories in Prussia, Germany, and Japan on Sakhalin Island in addition tothe Kurils, to retain the Baltic States, Finland and part of Romania, and it isprecisely because of the seizure of these countries the Soviet Union wasexpelled shortly before the war of League of Nations. Moreover, the West hasput a fait accompli, when Soviet troops moved suddenly to the west, deep intoalready defeated Germany, leaving far behind Berlin, which was a completesurprise to the Allies. Churchill later realized the true error (Fultonspeech), but it was too late, Stalin, in fact, already had to redraw the wholemap of Europe by making the satellites of the USSR in Eastern Europe, whicheventually led to the Cold War. And that's due to one person of Joseph Stalin,the ruler he created a vast empire of the USSR. Stalin could remove the needfor a person of any rank, even the closest associates, who have experienced thefear of the animal in front of him and with all this, the common people favoredleader, showing just a fanatical faith in him. Incredibly, - were shot by hisorders man shouted, "Long live Stalin!". It is unlikely that you willfind in the history of the person, which could be put side by side. Even afterdeath, people honor him, that in itself is a rarity in Russian history.Khrushchev could not erase the love of the Russian people to his executioner,and not strange, that the Russian people, and this despite the fact that theGeorgian Stalin has repeatedly talked about the Great Russian chauvinism, andthis despite the fact that the body of Stalin, Khrushchev pulled out of themausoleum, Lenin left alone. But who remembers the dead man lying Lenin,calling at the moment except that quiet smile. This, in my opinion, is the mainphenomenon of Stalin. So far, after more than half a century, many people inRussia are praying for him, trembling remembering the name of their belovedleader - Joseph Stalin.
The only who managed to outwitStalin, Hitler is, but it's a stretch, for deceiving Stalin, Hitler actuallysigned his own death warrant. It should be noted that even when the Germantroops violated the alliance treaty between Germany and the Soviet Union - anon-aggression pact and invaded the borders of the USSR, Stalin could notbelieve what had happened, he was so confident of Hitler. Stalin thought thatHitler was a strategic mistake; take such a risk to attack the USSR. Yes,Hitler was unpredictable. Perhaps Hitler was hoping that, if in the eyes of theWest, too, is an enemy of the Soviet Union, and in fact it was true in reality(annexation by the Soviet Union countries of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, partsof the territories of Finland, Poland, Romania), it is still unsophisticatedweb browsers England and France will understand what it is, Germany will beable in a short time away with the Jewish Bolshevik regime in Russia, so thatthe Russian people will be grateful. Stalin was more prepared for war withTurkey, which the Soviet Union as well as the Baltic States issued an ultimatumto allow the creation of on the Bosporus Naval Base, but not with Germany.Fortunately for unleashing the Second World War, the two aggressor grappledwith each other in mortal combat, and if this had not happened, I'm sure, thepolitical map of Europe would have been different. Can be a lot of options andguesses suggest, but one thing is clear, this does not happen, the world wouldbe different today.

06/26/13<o:p></o

[jimnyc]

Why are there so many instances in your "paragraphs" where words blend together without spaces? It makes it very difficult to read.

[gabosaurus]

DUDE!! Paragraphs are your friend! :slap:

[jimnyc]

DUDE!! Paragraphs are your friend! :slap:

I think the 'formatting issues' are a result of copying/pasting, whether that be from another site where he may have written the same, or from writing locally on ones machine and then copying/pasting to our site.

[Alik Bahshi]

[QUOTE=Alik Bahshi;648800]Alik Bahshi
amended text

Josef Stalin (Dzhugashvili) personality is very unique in many criteria, primarily in the field ofpsychology. With a natural gift of understanding of the people, Stalin, likex-ray machine to read minds, seeing the man through and through, knowing the pros and cons of all those with whom you have dealt with a strong devious mind allowed him to use all the twists, goals and plans surrounding the many leaders of the revolution, to build a more cunning scheme of physical elimination, not only rivals, but also all the possible contenders for power. He could not speakwell, he could ignite the crowd fiery speech as Trotsky or Rykov, but he's likea spider waiting, waiting for unsuspecting prey will be in his web. And not infrequently the victim and took part in the construction of the web. Could Trotsky (Bronstein), fully-developed intellectual, skillful orator, who had concentrated in the hands of the military power, to assume that this dork,Georgians, bad speaking in Russian, a former terrorist-robber hold him as aboy. In relations with people, Stalin never made a single mistake on the way topower, and being on top of it. And he spent Roosevelt and Churchill, andentirely dependent on the supply of materiel and military actions of Americaand England! Stalin was able to bargain with them in Tehran and Yalta ancestralterritories in Prussia, Germany, and Japan on Sakhalin Island in addition tothe Kurils, to retain the Baltic States, Finland and part of Romania, and it isprecisely because of the seizure of these countries the Soviet Union wasexpelled shortly before the war of League of Nations. Moreover, the West hasput a fait accompli, when Soviet troops moved suddenly to the west, deep into already defeated Germany, leaving far behind Berlin, which was a complete surprise to the Allies. Churchill later realized the true error (Fultonspeech), but it was too late, Stalin, in fact, already had to redraw the wholemap of Europe by making the satellites of the USSR in Eastern Europe, which eventually led to the Cold War. And that's due to one person of Joseph Stalin,the ruler he created a vast empire of the USSR. Stalin could remove the needfor a person of any rank, even the closest associates, who have experienced thefear of the animal in front of him and with all this, the common people favoredleader, showing just a fanatical faith in him. Incredibly, - were shot by hisorders man shouted, "Long live Stalin!". It is unlikely that you willfind in the history of the person, which could be put side by side. Even afterdeath, people honor him, that in itself is a rarity in Russian history.Khrushchev could not erase the love of the Russian people to his executioner,and not strange, that the Russian people, and this despite the fact that the Georgian Stalin has repeatedly talked about the Great Russian chauvinism, and this despite the fact that the body of Stalin, Khrushchev pulled out of the mausoleum, Lenin left alone. But who remembers the dead man lying Lenin,calling at the moment except that quiet smile. This, in my opinion, is the main phenomenon of Stalin. So far, after more than half a century, many people in Russia are praying for him, trembling remembering the name of their beloved leader - Joseph Stalin.
The only who managed to outwit Stalin, Hitler is, but it's a stretch, for deceiving Stalin, Hitler actually signed his own death warrant. It should be noted that even when the Germantroops violated the alliance treaty between Germany and the Soviet Union - anon-aggression pact and invaded the borders of the USSR, Stalin could not believe what had happened, he was so confident of Hitler. Stalin thought thatHitler was a strategic mistake; take such a risk to attack the USSR. Yes, Hitler was unpredictable. Perhaps Hitler was hoping that, if in the eyes of the West, too, is an enemy of the Soviet Union, and in fact it was true in reality (annexation by the Soviet Union countries of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, partsof the territories of Finland, Poland, Romania), it is still unsophisticated web browsers England and France will understand what it is, Germany will beable in a short time away with the Jewish Bolshevik regime in Russia, so thatthe Russian people will be grateful. Stalin was more prepared for war withTurkey, which the Soviet Union as well as the Baltic States issued an ultimatum to allow the creation of on the Bosporus Naval Base, but not with Germany.Fortunately for unleashing the Second World War, the two aggressor grappledwith each other in mortal combat, and if this had not happened, I'm sure, the political map of Europe would have been different. Can be a lot of options andguesses suggest, but one thing is clear, this does not happen, the world would be different today.

06/26/13<o:p></o

[Marcus Aurelius]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

[Voted4Reagan]

[QUOTE=Alik Bahshi;648800]Alik Bahshi
amended text

Josef Stalin (Dzhugashvili) personality is very unique in many criteria, primarily in the field ofpsychology. With a natural gift of understanding of the people, Stalin, likex-ray machine to read minds, seeing the man through and through, knowing the pros and cons of all those with whom you have dealt with a strong devious mind allowed him to use all the twists, goals and plans surrounding the many leaders of the revolution, to build a more cunning scheme of physical elimination, not only rivals, but also all the possible contenders for power. He could not speakwell, he could ignite the crowd fiery speech as Trotsky or Rykov, but he's likea spider waiting, waiting for unsuspecting prey will be in his web. And not infrequently the victim and took part in the construction of the web. Could Trotsky (Bronstein), fully-developed intellectual, skillful orator, who had concentrated in the hands of the military power, to assume that this dork,Georgians, bad speaking in Russian, a former terrorist-robber hold him as aboy. In relations with people, Stalin never made a single mistake on the way topower, and being on top of it. And he spent Roosevelt and Churchill, andentirely dependent on the supply of materiel and military actions of Americaand England! Stalin was able to bargain with them in Tehran and Yalta ancestralterritories in Prussia, Germany, and Japan on Sakhalin Island in addition tothe Kurils, to retain the Baltic States, Finland and part of Romania, and it isprecisely because of the seizure of these countries the Soviet Union wasexpelled shortly before the war of League of Nations. Moreover, the West hasput a fait accompli, when Soviet troops moved suddenly to the west, deep into already defeated Germany, leaving far behind Berlin, which was a complete surprise to the Allies. Churchill later realized the true error (Fultonspeech), but it was too late, Stalin, in fact, already had to redraw the wholemap of Europe by making the satellites of the USSR in Eastern Europe, which eventually led to the Cold War. And that's due to one person of Joseph Stalin,the ruler he created a vast empire of the USSR. Stalin could remove the needfor a person of any rank, even the closest associates, who have experienced thefear of the animal in front of him and with all this, the common people favoredleader, showing just a fanatical faith in him. Incredibly, - were shot by hisorders man shouted, "Long live Stalin!". It is unlikely that you willfind in the history of the person, which could be put side by side. Even afterdeath, people honor him, that in itself is a rarity in Russian history.Khrushchev could not erase the love of the Russian people to his executioner,and not strange, that the Russian people, and this despite the fact that the Georgian Stalin has repeatedly talked about the Great Russian chauvinism, and this despite the fact that the body of Stalin, Khrushchev pulled out of the mausoleum, Lenin left alone. But who remembers the dead man lying Lenin,calling at the moment except that quiet smile. This, in my opinion, is the main phenomenon of Stalin. So far, after more than half a century, many people in Russia are praying for him, trembling remembering the name of their beloved leader - Joseph Stalin.
The only who managed to outwit Stalin, Hitler is, but it's a stretch, for deceiving Stalin, Hitler actually signed his own death warrant. It should be noted that even when the Germantroops violated the alliance treaty between Germany and the Soviet Union - anon-aggression pact and invaded the borders of the USSR, Stalin could not believe what had happened, he was so confident of Hitler. Stalin thought thatHitler was a strategic mistake; take such a risk to attack the USSR. Yes, Hitler was unpredictable. Perhaps Hitler was hoping that, if in the eyes of the West, too, is an enemy of the Soviet Union, and in fact it was true in reality (annexation by the Soviet Union countries of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, partsof the territories of Finland, Poland, Romania), it is still unsophisticated web browsers England and France will understand what it is, Germany will beable in a short time away with the Jewish Bolshevik regime in Russia, so thatthe Russian people will be grateful. Stalin was more prepared for war withTurkey, which the Soviet Union as well as the Baltic States issued an ultimatum to allow the creation of on the Bosporus Naval Base, but not with Germany.Fortunately for unleashing the Second World War, the two aggressor grappledwith each other in mortal combat, and if this had not happened, I'm sure, the political map of Europe would have been different. Can be a lot of options andguesses suggest, but one thing is clear, this does not happen, the world would be different today.

06/26/13<o:p> </o

Stalin was a psychotic. He murdered 10's of millions of his own countrymen.

He purged his entire Army of it's senior officers and by doing so allowed the needless death and imprisonment of Millions more Soviet Soldiers. It also allowed Hitler to push the Red Army back to the outskirts of Moscow thereby lengthening the war by 2 years!

As a leader he was nearly as insane as Hitler. Carelessly throwing away whole armies of men.

He murdered his own son.

He had Kirov murdered and passed the blame onto Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev.

He helped cause the Soviet Famine of 1932 costing the lives of 500,000 people.

He caused through mismanagement the Famine of 1947 that resulted in the deaths of 1.5 million

He was responsible for the Ukrainian Genocide that cost the lives of 5 MILLION people.

He shipped untold millions to Siberia and the Gulag resulting in the deaths of Millions more.

He betrayed the Lenin revolution and made it all about a gain of Personal power.

Stalin was a Mad Man.... and a Fool.

You're making him out to be a Hero....

That makes you a bigger fool than Stalin....

[Alik Bahshi]

[QUOTE=Alik Bahshi;648814]

Stalin was a psychotic. He murdered 10's of millions of his own countrymen.

He purged his entire Army of it's senior officers and by doing so allowed the needless death and imprisonment of Millions more Soviet Soldiers. It also allowed Hitler to push the Red Army back to the outskirts of Moscow thereby lengthening the war by 2 years!

As a leader he was nearly as insane as Hitler. Carelessly throwing away whole armies of men.

He murdered his own son.

He had Kirov murdered and passed the blame onto Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev.

He helped cause the Soviet Famine of 1932 costing the lives of 500,000 people.

He caused through mismanagement the Famine of 1947 that resulted in the deaths of 1.5 million

He was responsible for the Ukrainian Genocide that cost the lives of 5 MILLION people.

He shipped untold millions to Siberia and the Gulag resulting in the deaths of Millions more.

He betrayed the Lenin revolution and made it all about a gain of Personal power.

Stalin was a Mad Man.... and a Fool.

You're making him out to be a Hero....

That makes you a bigger fool than Stalin....

I think you do not take the text. Where am I called Stalin a hero? Stalin was well versed in the psychology of people, but that does not mean to be a hero. Stalin was a brilliant politician, but that does not mean to be a hero. Stalin was a good organizer, but it does not mean to be a hero. Stalin was well versed in military equipment and properly defined the prospects for its development. Being an evil genius, do not mean to be a hero. Call such a person a fool can only fool! This looks like a fool you are. You have also identified me a fool, but that's your opinion and I'm not going to change it.
I just want to remind you yesterday you called me a plagiarist, and then apologized.

All the best to you, "clever."

[Marcus Aurelius]

[QUOTE=Voted4Reagan;649053]

I think you do not take the text. Where am I called Stalin a hero? Stalin was well versed in the psychology of people, but that does not mean to be a hero. Stalin was a brilliant politician, but that does not mean to be a hero. Stalin was a good organizer, but it does not mean to be a hero. Stalin was well versed in military equipment and properly defined the prospects for its development. Being an evil genius, do not mean to be a hero. Call such a person a fool can only fool! This looks like a fool you are. You have also identified me a fool, but that's your opinion and I'm not going to change it.
I just want to remind you yesterday you called me a plagiarist, and then apologized.

All the best to you, "clever."

That's an awful lot of praise for a madman there, Alik.

[Voted4Reagan]

http://youtu.be/ZT2z0nrsQ8o

[Alik Bahshi]

http://youtu.be/ZT2z0nrsQ8o

Another example is when an opponent does not find the right words. Only now he does not cite Wikipedia, refers to YouTube.

[Voted4Reagan]

Keep posting your 5000 word essays...

See how long you'll last around here....

[Robert A Whit]

Keep posting your 5000 word essays...

See how long you'll last around here....

Yeah


We are Americans and don't want to know world history. :rolleyes:

[Little-Acorn]

He helped cause the Soviet Famine of 1932 costing the lives of 500,000 people.


You left off a zero.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%931933

[Voted4Reagan]

You left off a zero.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%931933

Mea Culpa... I stand corrected my friend...

The Famine of 1932 caused the deaths of 5,000,000 people

another 4.5 million lives on Stalins Butchers Bill

[aboutime]

Another example is when an opponent does not find the right words. Only now he does not cite Wikipedia, refers to YouTube.


Alik. You could have saved all of us a lot of time here. You should have told us those photo's were relatives. Bet you're so proud?

[Robert A Whit]

You left off a zero.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%931933

My Black Book of Communism states on page 159 that it is proven that more than 6 million died in the 1932-33 great famine. Stalin simply denied to the world that the famine happened. It took until the 1980s for the truth to be told.

[Marcus Aurelius]

Originally Posted by Little-Acorn http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=650483#post650483) You left off a zero.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_...2%E2%80%931933 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%931933)




My Black Book of Communism states on page 159 that it is proven that more than 6 million died in the 1932-33 great famine. Stalin simply denied to the world that the famine happened. It took until the 1980s for the truth to be told.

If you bothered to read the link he posted, you'd see that is mentioned.

[Robert A Whit]

If you bothered to read the link he posted, you'd see that is mentioned.


Had you read his link you would have spotted this warning

This article includes a list of references (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources), but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:INCITE). Please help to improve (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Fact_and_Reference_Check)thi s article by introducing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_cite) more precise citations. <small style="line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">(July 2010)</small>

[Marcus Aurelius]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=650492#post650492)
If you bothered to read the link he posted, you'd see that is mentioned.



Had you read his link you would have spotted this warning

This article includes a list of references (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources), but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:INCITE). Please help to improve (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Fact_and_Reference_Check)thi s article by introducing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:When_to_cite) more precise citations. <small style="line-height: 19.200000762939453px;">(July 2010)</small>


wow, you are really on a dumb ass roll tonight.

He mentioned 5,000,000 deaths... you mentioned a specific source and 6,000,000 deaths... the source you mentioned is listed on his linked piece, which I point this out to you...

and you read me a warning implying information on his linked page... a page that AGREED WITH YOU... is potentially inaccurate?

Do you even realize in your zeal to make me wrong about something, you cast doubt on your own post? Probably not.

[Robert A Whit]

wow, you are really on a dumb ass roll tonight.

He mentioned 5,000,000 deaths... you mentioned a specific source and 6,000,000 deaths... the source you mentioned is listed on his linked piece, which I point this out to you...

and you read me a warning implying information on his linked page... a page that AGREED WITH YOU... is potentially inaccurate?

Do you even realize in your zeal to make me wrong about something, you cast doubt on your own post? Probably not.

While I confirmed his numbers, they were short of being high enough. My source is very accurate.

[Marcus Aurelius]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=650502#post650502)
wow, you are really on a dumb ass roll tonight.

He mentioned 5,000,000 deaths... you mentioned a specific source and 6,000,000 deaths... the source you mentioned is listed on his linked piece, which I point this out to you...

and you read me a warning implying information on his linked page... a page that AGREED WITH YOU... is potentially inaccurate?

Do you even realize in your zeal to make me wrong about something, you cast doubt on your own post? Probably not.




While I confirmed his numbers, they were short of being high enough. My source is very accurate.

First, you claim the linked page is potentially inaccurate... then use it as proof YOUR numbers are more accurate than his, when your numbers CAME from that same page?

wow. just.... wow.:rolleyes:

[Robert A Whit]

First, you claim the linked page is potentially inaccurate... then use it as proof YOUR numbers are more accurate than his, when your numbers CAME from that same page?

wow. just.... wow.:rolleyes:

My numbers as I stated in the very beginning come from the Book The black book of communism.

My book contains the research of 6 expert authors and is translated into English by Jonathan Murphy and Mark Kramer. You sure can't read for shit.

I will put my book up against your use of Wikipedia all day long. My book has 858 pages vs your Wikipedia?????

Why can't you ever ask questions if you doubt them rather than try to pretend you are some badass punk from PA in trouble over your Tardis?

Do you honestly think your neighbors approve that? You love to swim against your own neighbors.

[Marcus Aurelius]

My numbers as I stated in the very beginning come from the Book The black book of communism.

My book contains the research of 6 expert authors and is translated into English by Jonathan Murphy and Mark Kramer. You sure can't read for shit.

I will put my book up against your use of Wikipedia all day long. My book has 858 pages vs your Wikipedia?????

Why can't you ever ask questions if you doubt them rather than try to pretend you are some badass punk from PA in trouble over your Tardis?

Do you honestly think your neighbors approve that? You love to swim against your own neighbors.

Point 1: No shit.
Point 2: Your book was LISTED AS A SOURCE on the Wiki page, dumb ass.
Point 3:YOU posted a quote from the Wiki page, questioning it's accuracy, even though they mentioned the book YOU USED for information, as a source.... You questioned the accuracy of a page that AGREED with you, dumb ass.
Point 4: TARDIS issue is resolved... I won. besides that's off topic.

[Robert A Whit]

Point 1: No shit.
Point 2: Your book was LISTED AS A SOURCE on the Wiki page, dumb ass.
Point 3:YOU posted a quote from the Wiki page, questioning it's accuracy, even though they mentioned the book YOU USED for information, as a source.... You questioned the accuracy of a page that AGREED with you, dumb ass.
Point 4: TARDIS issue is resolved... I won. besides that's off topic.

I am really sorry you got away with breaking the rules.

I don't give a shit what Wikipedia said and it was Acorn that I cut and pasted his link to Wikipedia. I don't need Wikipedia since I have ample resources. I would have said 5 million had I used Wikipedia but I simply used my own book and cited it's figures. If the link agrees it was 6 million, fine. But it would only be important to a tyrant like you are.

You have long ago persuaded me you will locate a poster or maybe 2 then try to destroy the forum with your abusive attitude. I Now am persuaded by your remarks you are not mentally well.

You have an attitude that makes people despise your posts.

My goal on forums is in part to enjoy other people's comments. I hate your comments.

[Alik Bahshi]

I am really sorry you got away with breaking the rules.

I don't give a shit what Wikipedia said and it was Acorn that I cut and pasted his link to Wikipedia. I don't need Wikipedia since I have ample resources. I would have said 5 million had I used Wikipedia but I simply used my own book and cited it's figures. If the link agrees it was 6 million, fine. But it would only be important to a tyrant like you are.

You have long ago persuaded me you will locate a poster or maybe 2 then try to destroy the forum with your abusive attitude. I Now am persuaded by your remarks you are not mentally well.

You have an attitude that makes people despise your posts.

My goal on forums is in part to enjoy other people's comments. I hate your comments.

All comments our Emperor Aurelius begin and end the humiliation of personality opponent, so at least it was to me. In my themes he participated the most, but never any reasoned objection from him I did not see. I ignore it, it ignores the caravan going to the dog barking.

[Robert A Whit]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Robert A Whit http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=650564#post650564)
I am really sorry you got away with breaking the rules.

I don't give a shit what Wikipedia said and it was Acorn that I cut and pasted his link to Wikipedia. I don't need Wikipedia since I have ample resources. I would have said 5 million had I used Wikipedia but I simply used my own book and cited it's figures. If the link agrees it was 6 million, fine. But it would only be important to a tyrant like you are.

You have long ago persuaded me you will locate a poster or maybe 2 then try to destroy the forum with your abusive attitude. I Now am persuaded by your remarks you are not mentally well.

You have an attitude that makes people despise your posts.

My goal on forums is in part to enjoy other people's comments. I hate your comments.




All comments our Emperor Aurelius begin and end the humiliation of personality opponent, so at least it was to me. In my themes he participated the most, but never any reasoned objection from him I did not see. I ignore it, it ignores the caravan going to the dog barking.

Yes, that is precisely how he operates.

I have to blame myself since I was asked over and over to ignore the poster, yet others keep quoting him. Making his posts visible to me.

He adds nothing to any debate he gets into unless he is not in attack mode. But his standard procedure is to attack. Then along comes his BFF Abouttime who supports his every comment.

[Voted4Reagan]

Yes, that is precisely how he operates.

I have to blame myself since I was asked over and over to ignore the poster, yet others keep quoting him. Making his posts visible to me.

He adds nothing to any debate he gets into unless he is not in attack mode. But his standard procedure is to attack. Then along comes his BFF Abouttime who supports his every comment.

Make sure Alik give you the $20 when you finish blowing the Sunshine up his ass...

Maybe you two should get a Room... I detect a Bro-Mance....

Dumbass

[Robert A Whit]

Make sure Alik give you the $20 when you finish blowing the Sunshine up his ass...

Maybe you two should get a Room... I detect a Bro-Mance....

Dumbass

You don't even know half of what you claim to know.

I give you credit for what you really know.

[aboutime]

Make sure Alik give you the $20 when you finish blowing the Sunshine up his ass...

Maybe you two should get a Room... I detect a Bro-Mance....

Dumbass


V4R. Sad thing is. Robert will probably ask for 19.99 dollars in change.

[WiccanLiberal]

Getting back to the topic folks, I believe the point is one I have observed with regard to many historical figures. The ones who have done the most damage, the most evil if you will, are the ones who know how to use people. They have an apparently uncanny ability to use a native understanding of psychology to manipulate those around them. What bothers me is that we have seen this so often in so many places and seem never to be able to recognize the rise of yet another tyrant.

[Voted4Reagan]

http://randomoverload.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/99ea0178b0leader.jpg.jpg

[Robert A Whit]

V4R. Sad thing is. Robert will probably ask for 19.99 dollars in change.

One more post that you tried to switch to being about Robert.

Speak to topics and be happy.

[aboutime]

One more post that you tried to switch to being about Robert.

Speak to topics and be happy.


What makes you think I'm not happy? Every time you post, and remind all of us how you use the IGNORE feature so well. I get happier than you'll ever know.

Don't worry. Be Happy.

[Marcus Aurelius]

I am really sorry you got away with breaking the rules. then report me, dumb ass.

I don't give a shit what Wikipedia said and it was Acorn that I cut and pasted his link to Wikipedia. I don't need Wikipedia since I have ample resources. I would have said 5 million had I used Wikipedia but I simply used my own book and cited it's figures. If the link agrees it was 6 million, fine. But it would only be important to a tyrant like you are.

You have long ago persuaded me you will locate a poster or maybe 2 then try to destroy the forum with your abusive attitude. I Now am persuaded by your remarks you are not mentally well. awww... I'm all hurted inside. MOT.

You have an attitude that makes people despise your posts. Now YOU speak for the whole board?

My goal on forums is in part to enjoy other people's comments. I hate your comments. You hate when your nonsense and lies are outed.

comments in RED above

[Robert A Whit]

What makes you think I'm not happy? Every time you post, and remind all of us how you use the IGNORE feature so well. I get happier than you'll ever know.

Don't worry. Be Happy.

Sure, i will piss off everybody by giving you more attention. I am happy you are happy.

[Alik Bahshi]

Getting back to the topic folks, I believe the point is one I have observed with regard to many historical figures. The ones who have done the most damage, the most evil if you will, are the ones who know how to use people. They have an apparently uncanny ability to use a native understanding of psychology to manipulate those around them. What bothers me is that we have seen this so often in so many places and seem never to be able to recognize the rise of yet another tyrant.

Here you are, a new tyrant has appeared, and again in Russia, who brandishes a nuclear club, threatening the whole world. The West lost its time when Putin attacked Ukraine, seizing Crimea in 2014. Obama failed to respond to Russia's insolence, and the world has a big problem today. In 2017, I wrote the article "Obama's Inglourious Departure", now I will post it.

[Gunny]

Here you are, a new tyrant has appeared, and again in Russia, who brandishes a nuclear club, threatening the whole world. The West lost its time when Putin attacked Ukraine, seizing Crimea in 2014. Obama failed to respond to Russia's insolence, and the world has a big problem today. In 2017, I wrote the article "Obama's Inglourious Departure", now I will post it.You are replying to a post made on 07-26-2013 and a member who hasn't posted on this board probably since then. I hope you aren't waiting for a response :laugh:

Stalin was a thug. Your original post gives him WAY too much credit. It doesn't take any kind of intelligence to kill anyone you don't like or believe to be a threat. Just the ability to do so. Stalin was in the right place at the right time and took advantage of the opportunity by killing his rivals and suspected rivals before anyone could offer any real opposition.

Not hard to do when the people have been so dumbed down they can't think nor fight for themselves.

[Alik Bahshi]

You are replying to a post made on 07-26-2013 and a member who hasn't posted on this board probably since then. I hope you aren't waiting for a response :laugh:

Stalin was a thug. Your original post gives him WAY too much credit. It doesn't take any kind of intelligence to kill anyone you don't like or believe to be a threat. Just the ability to do so. Stalin was in the right place at the right time and took advantage of the opportunity by killing his rivals and suspected rivals before anyone could offer any real opposition.

Not hard to do when the people have been so dumbed down they can't think nor fight for themselves.

You underestimate Stalin. He was able to single-handedly eliminate a whole galaxy of Jewish revolutionaries, headed by Trotsky, on the way to power. Stalin also deceived Roosevelt and Churchill in World War II by capturing half of Europe and the Kuril Islands. True, Churchill foresaw, but could not do anything.