PDA

View Full Version : War: USA Military Support for Syrian 'rebels'



jimnyc
06-14-2013, 10:37 AM
So it appears our government is ready to send weaponry to Al Qae.... I mean the 'Syrian Rebels'. I say let the country take care of themselves. How long and how many Muslims stated "stay out of our business" in reference to other countries? I repeat what I said once before - let them get help from the other Islamic countries. Let them get help from Al Qaeda.


The Obama administration has concluded that Syrian President Bashar Assad's government used chemical weapons against the rebels seeking to overthrow him and, in a major policy shift, President Obama has decided to supply military support to the rebels, the White House announced Thursday.

"The president has made a decision about providing more support to the opposition that will involve providing direct support to the [Supreme Military Council]. That includes military support," Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communication Ben Rhodes told reporters.

President Obama has repeatedly said that the use of chemical weapons is a "red line" that, if crossed, would be a "game changer" for more U.S. involvement in the Syrian civil war.

"The President has been clear that the use of chemical weapons - or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups - is a red line for the United States," said Rhodes in a separate written statement.

"The President has said that the use of chemical weapons would change his calculus, and it has," he continued.

In terms of further response, Rhodes said, "we will make decisions on our own timeline" and that Congress and the international community would be consulted. Mr. Obama is heading to Northern Ireland Sunday for a meeting of the G8 group of nations; Rhodes indicated the president will consult with leaders of those countries.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57589252/u.s.-syria-used-chemical-weapons-crossing-red-line/

Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda
BEIRUT — A Syrian rebel group's April pledge of allegiance to al-Qaeda's replacement for Osama bin Laden suggests that the terrorist group's influence is not waning and that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The pledge of allegiance by Syrian Jabhat al Nusra Front chief Abou Mohamad al-Joulani to al-Qaeda leader Sheik Ayman al-Zawahri was coupled with an announcement by the al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, the Islamic State of Iraq, that it would work with al Nusra as well.

Lebanese Sheik Omar Bakri, a Salafist who says states must be governed by Muslim religious law, says al-Qaeda has assisted al Nusra for some time.

"They provided them early on with technical, military and financial support , especially when it came to setting up networks of foreign jihadis who were brought into Syria," Bakri says. "There will certainly be greater coordination between the two groups.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/04/11/syria-al-qaeda-connection/2075323/

jimnyc
06-14-2013, 10:44 AM
And do we want to arm "rebels" that are capable of this type of crap, because they were "insulted"? Remeber - "fuck freedom of speech" and "death to America". I wouldn't give them shit. It's their civil war, their problem now.

Report: Syrian rebels executed a 14-year-old boy for insulting IslamWhen a 14-year-old boy from the Syrian city of Aleppo named Mohammad Qatta was asked to bring one of his customers some coffee, he reportedly refused, saying, “Even if [Prophet] Mohammed comes back to life, I won’t.”

According to a story reported by two grassroots Syrian opposition groups, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and the Aleppo Media Center, Qatta’s words got him killed. A group of Islamist rebels, driving by in a black car, reportedly heard the exchange. They stopped the car, grabbed the boy and took him away.

Qatta, in refusing to serve a customer coffee – it’s not clear why – had used a phrase that the Islamist rebels took as an insult toward the Prophet Mohammed, the most important figure in Islam. That offhand comment, made by a boy, was apparently enough for these rebels to warrant a grisly execution and public warning."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/06/11/report-syrian-rebels-executed-a-14-year-old-boy-for-insulting-islam/

gabosaurus
06-14-2013, 10:47 AM
I am totally opposed to any intervention. Thatcher sent aid to Iraq three decades ago and look what happened there.

jimnyc
06-14-2013, 10:53 AM
I am totally opposed to any intervention. Thatcher sent aid to Iraq three decades ago and look what happened there.

Honestly, I've never been opposed to helping countries in need, especially when innocent lives are at stake. But it's always twisted about what we want out of it, or that it's none of our business. Toss in the Al Qaeda factor and it's a trifecta. They don't want our help, they don't like us and what we stand for, we're always overreaching... Save the money on any weaponry earmarked for them and use it on our economy here. Save the assistance for people that appreciate it.

gabosaurus
06-14-2013, 10:59 AM
Honestly, I've never been opposed to helping countries in need, especially when innocent lives are at stake. But it's always twisted about what we want out of it, or that it's none of our business. Toss in the Al Qaeda factor and it's a trifecta. They don't want our help, they don't like us and what we stand for, we're always overreaching... Save the money on any weaponry earmarked for them and use it on our economy here. Save the assistance for people that appreciate it.

I totally agree with this. I don't think our presence is needed anywhere in the Middle East. Including Afghanistan. They are ungrateful and undeserving people.

Voted4Reagan
06-14-2013, 11:12 AM
I totally agree with this. I don't think our presence is needed anywhere in the Middle East. Including Afghanistan. They are ungrateful and undeserving people.

Except for Israel... they show appreciation...

gabosaurus
06-14-2013, 11:14 AM
I meant EVERYONE. Israel can take care of themselves. They haven't lost any conflicts lately.

Voted4Reagan
06-14-2013, 11:48 AM
I meant EVERYONE. Israel can take care of themselves. They haven't lost any conflicts lately.

Israel and the USA will always be intertwined Gabby.

We get a lot from them. Much of it beyond cost.

It's reciprocal.. we help one another

aboutime
06-14-2013, 12:26 PM
Why should anyone be upset about this?

After all THE AMERICAN PEOPLE voted TWICE for what has become America's most dangerous enemy.

Guess what his name is?