Supposn
06-02-2013, 02:27 PM
The inconstant purchasing power of U.S. dollars.</SPAN>
The purchasing power of the dollar is not a constant.</SPAN>
The problem this causes was obvious with respect to social security retirement which spans a duration of people’s entire working years. </SPAN>
The solution (which no one claims is perfect; but in the opinion of many has been and will continue if left in place), to be very satisfactory improvement of what it replaced. For many years social security social security retirement benefits have been annually adjusted by using the U .S. cost-price urban index. (CP-U). </SPAN>
Now the president is willing to agree (as a political bargaining chip) to modify our current formulas for utilizing a CP index. There is general concurrence over the entire political spectrum that the proposed modification of the method would be less responsive to the U.S. dollar’s inflation and thus would over the long term reduce the benefits of social security recipients.</SPAN>
Populists are opposed to such a change but we certainly want an annually adjusted federal minimum wage. </SPAN>
Over years ‘durations, changing values of the U.S. dollar often dilute and undermine. if not completely distorting the purposes of laws and regulations within which numbers of dollars are finitely expressed.</SPAN>
The president should bargain for a greater than $9 FMW OR a $9 FMW and all federal laws and regulations should henceforth be expressed as indexed U.S. dollars.</SPAN>
If the U.S. Congress doesn’t pass it, that should be among the Democrats major issues in 2014 and 2016 federal elections.</SPAN>
Respectfully, Supposn</SPAN>
The purchasing power of the dollar is not a constant.</SPAN>
The problem this causes was obvious with respect to social security retirement which spans a duration of people’s entire working years. </SPAN>
The solution (which no one claims is perfect; but in the opinion of many has been and will continue if left in place), to be very satisfactory improvement of what it replaced. For many years social security social security retirement benefits have been annually adjusted by using the U .S. cost-price urban index. (CP-U). </SPAN>
Now the president is willing to agree (as a political bargaining chip) to modify our current formulas for utilizing a CP index. There is general concurrence over the entire political spectrum that the proposed modification of the method would be less responsive to the U.S. dollar’s inflation and thus would over the long term reduce the benefits of social security recipients.</SPAN>
Populists are opposed to such a change but we certainly want an annually adjusted federal minimum wage. </SPAN>
Over years ‘durations, changing values of the U.S. dollar often dilute and undermine. if not completely distorting the purposes of laws and regulations within which numbers of dollars are finitely expressed.</SPAN>
The president should bargain for a greater than $9 FMW OR a $9 FMW and all federal laws and regulations should henceforth be expressed as indexed U.S. dollars.</SPAN>
If the U.S. Congress doesn’t pass it, that should be among the Democrats major issues in 2014 and 2016 federal elections.</SPAN>
Respectfully, Supposn</SPAN>