Middle East Employers & Slave Filipinos

[taft2012]

I've spoken of this in the course of several threads. Here's an example:

http://en-maktoob.news.yahoo.com/-abused--maid-in-ras-al-khaimah-rescued-after-facebook-plea-041746135.html



A housemaid has been spared the threat of further abuse at the hands of her employer after her plea for help went viral on facebook.

Cristine Dumo was rescued from the house in Ras Al Khaimah by welfare workers on Tuesday night and is now in the care of the Philippines Consulate in Dubai.

An officer from the consulate told 7DAYS: “We received her at our centre for migrant workers last night. She is traumatised but stable. She is relieved to be safe and will not have to go back to her employer.”

The 23-year-old Filipina, who had been working for her employer for eight months, described how her boss tried to sexually assault her many times but she fought back. The officer said: “She said that he slapped her and tried to rape her. She managed to resist. She said she was scared to cry out for help because he threatened to send her to prison if she ever told anyone anything.”

The consulate representative added that Dumo was one of the lucky ones that escaped just in time.

“We have seen much graver cases,” the official said. “Victims come in with bruises and marks after they have been raped or physically abused. The number of cases we see varies, but there have been times where we have even received five calls a day.”

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I've spoken of this in the course of several threads. Here's an example:

http://en-maktoob.news.yahoo.com/-abused--maid-in-ras-al-khaimah-rescued-after-facebook-plea-041746135.html

Why not? Why not just rape the women. It is the muslim thing to do and no charges can be brought against the man. Sharia law protects him. No female foreign worker should ever go into a muslim controlled country to work. They are damn animals and simply can not be trusted . They have zero honor. -Tyr

[taft2012]

Just a side note:

I was reading about a sharia law they had in Pakistan, but it's in other Muzzie countries too. It's called "Hudud." Raping a woman is punishable by death, wrongfully accusing a man of rape is punishable by death, and fornication outside of marriage is punishable by death.

However, for a woman to bring rape charges against a man she needed FOUR witnesses.

So, if she accused someone of rape but didn't have four witnesses, he couldn't be charged. Even worse, because there was "no rape", she'd get charged with fornication, because she basically just admitted she'd had sexual relations outside of marriage.

And even worse, if the rape impregnated her, then the prosecutors had evidence she had sex outside of marriage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudood_Ordinance



Critics of the law include those who claim that it equiparates the crime of zina (adultery) and zina bil-jabr (rape). As for the rape, a woman alleging rape is required to provide four adult male eyewitnesses. In principal the failure to find such proof of the rape does not place the woman herself at risk of prosecution. However in practice these safeguards have not always worked. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudood_Ordinance#cite_note-6)Moreover, to prove rape the female victim has to state that sexual intercourse had taken place, which seems in practice to be viewed judicially as an admission of guilt on her own part, rather than as evidence of rape. If the alleged offender, however, is acquitted for want of further evidence the woman now faces charges for either adultery, if she is married, or for fornication, if she is not married. According to a report by the National Commission on Status of Women(NCSW) "an estimated 80% of women" in jail in 2003 were there as because "they had failed to prove rape charges and were consequently convicted of adultery."



(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudood_Ordinance#cite_note-8)

Stories of great personal suffering by women who claimed to have been raped appeared in the press in the years following the passing of the Hudood Ordinance. The case of Safia Bibi is one of this: a blind girl and victim of rape who was prosecuted for the crime of zina because of her illegitimate pregnancy, while the rapist was acquitted. The case stirred many protests from Pakistani activists and lawyers along with international human rights organizations. The appeal judgment of the Federal Shariah Court cleared the girl of the accusation of zina.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudood_Ordinance#cite_note-9)


The evidence of guilt was there for all to see: a newborn baby in the arms of its mother, a village woman named Zafran Bibi. Her crime: she had been raped. Her sentence: death by stoning. Now Ms. Zafran Bibi, who is about 26, is in solitary confinement in a death-row cell.

Thumping a fat red statute book, the white-bearded judge who convicted her, Anwar Ali Khan, said he had simply followed the letter of the Qoran-based law, known as hudood, that mandates punishments.

"The illegitimate child is not disowned by her and therefore is proof of zina," he said, referring to laws that forbid any sexual contact outside marriage. Furthermore, he said, in accusing her brother-in-law of raping her, Ms. Zafran had confessed to her crime.

However, Mufti Taqi Usmani (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqi_Usmani), an instrumental figure in making the law, has stated:

If anyone says that she was punished because of Qazaf (false accusation of rape) then Qazaf Ordinance, Clause no. 3, Exemption no. 2 clearly states that if someone approaches the legal authorities with a rape complaint, she cannot be punished in case she is unable to present 4 witnesses. No court of law can be in its right mind to award such a punishment.

A number of international and Pakistani human rights organizations still campaign for the law's repeal. Some argue that it goes beyond what is required by Sharia. They are opposed by conservative religious parties, who accuse them of departing from Islamic values. The governments of Benazir Bhutto (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benazir_Bhutto) and Nawaz Sharif (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nawaz_Sharif) both set up commissions to investigate the Hudood Ordinance. Both commissions recommended amending certain aspects of the law, but neither government followed through.

In all fairness, however, it should be noted that none of the individuals in the above matters were real Muslims.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

Just a side note:

I was reading about a sharia law they had in Pakistan, but it's in other Muzzie countries too. It's called "Hudud." Raping a woman is punishable by death, wrongfully accusing a man of rape is punishable by death, and fornication outside of marriage is punishable by death.

However, for a woman to bring rape charges against a man she needed FOUR witnesses.

So, if she accused someone of rape but didn't have four witnesses, he couldn't be charged. Even worse, because there was "no rape", she'd get charged with fornication, because she basically just admitted she'd had sexual relations outside of marriage.

And even worse, if the rape impregnated her, then the prosecutors had evidence she had sex outside of marriage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudood_Ordinance



In all fairness, however, it should be noted that none of the individuals in the above matters were real Muslims.

That equates to always being able to rape a woman if FOUR other males are not present!!!!
And even if there are four other males present the rape victim faces a death sentence herself should she bring charges and not all four totally back up her story about being raped..

A deck so damn stacked that it gives 100% permission to rape any woman not accompanied by four very trusted males(relatives).
Tell me that muslims are not animalistic , sex crazed raping bastards! Tell me these insane laws did not come from a (child molesting) raping perverted mind (mohammad)!--Tyr

[Marcus Aurelius]

I'd have to search his posts, but I believe Jahil has stated that he approves/agrees with the '4 witnesses' thing. I wonder though, if his wife told him she was raped and wanted to press charges, would he ask her for 4 witnesses?


EDIT:

found it...

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?38298-Apostasy-%93Whoever-changes-his-%28Islamic%29-religion-kill-him%94-by-Abdallah-al-Araby&p=602717#post602717

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I'd have to search his posts, but I believe Jahil has stated that he approves/agrees with the '4 witnesses' thing. I wonder though, if his wife told him she was raped and wanted to press charges, would he ask her for 4 witnesses?

No need to research my friend... Jafar has often supported and confirmed that Sharia law is valid.
Do you think a Hamas supporter would not fully support Sharia law ?
However, Jafar should answer and apply his own little spin on it...-

Seems he has been in hiding as of late.. :laugh: -Tyr