CNN Paid by foreign gov'ts to run propaganda and more...

[revelarts]

CNN Paid by foreign gov'ts to run propaganda and more...


3 Time Emmy Award Winning CNN Journalist: Mainstream Media Takes Money from FOREIGN Dictators to Run Flattering Propaganda
...
American “News” Networks Run Infomericals for Foreign Dictators … Pretend It’s Actual Reporting

If you’ve been paying attention, you know that the American media act as presstitutes for rich and powerful Americans.

But it turns out that the American media will turn “tricks” for foreign johns as well …

Specifically, three time Emmy award winning reporter Amber Lyon was until very recently a respected CNN reporter:
Lyon was fired from CNN after she refused to stop reporting on her first-hand experience of the systematic torture and murder of peaceful protesters by the government of Bahrain.

Lyon’s special report on Bahrain was scheduled to run on both CNN’s U.S. and international networks, but was pulled after only a limited showing due to pressure from the Bahrainis and their lobbyists.

At the same time that Lyon was risking her life to do on-the-ground reporting in Bahrain, another CNN journalist was filming a paid propaganda piece on how the Bahraini leaders are a bunch of friendly pro-democracy reformers.

That’s right … the Bahraini government paid CNN to do what was literally an infomercial for that brutal regime and pretend it was real journalism.

Lyon says that China and many other foreign, authoritarian regimes also pay CNN and other mainstream networks to run flattering propaganda pieces.

We are grateful for Ms. Lyon’s exposé of this revolting practice … especially because real reporting is treated as terrorism by the American government.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/3-time-emmy-award-winning-cnn-journalist-mainstream-media-takes-money-from-foreign-dictators-to-run-flattering-propaganda.html

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eGDVzJNMKs8?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

[revelarts]

Story from the Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/04/cnn-business-state-sponsored-news

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/04/cnn-international-documentary-bahrain-arab-spring-repression


Series: Glenn Greenwald on security and liberty (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/series/glenn-greenwald-security-liberty)


CNN and the business of state-sponsored TV news

The network is seriously compromising its journalism in the Gulf states by blurring the line between advertising and editorial

• Report: why didn't CNNi air its own 'iRevolution' documentary? (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/04/cnn-international-documentary-bahrain-arab-spring-repression)



CNN's state-sponsored program on Kazakhstan. Photograph: via CNN

Today I reported on the refusal of CNN International (CNNi) to broadcast an award-winning documentary, "iRevolution" (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/04/cnn-international-documentary-bahrain-arab-spring-repression), that was produced in early 2011 as the Arab Spring engulfed the region and which was highly critical of the regime in Bahrain (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/bahrain). The documentary, featuring CNN (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/cnn)'s on-air correspondent Amber Lyon, viscerally documented the brutality and violence the regime was using against its own citizens who were peacefully protesting for democracy. Commenting on why the documentary did not air on CNNi, CNN's spokesman cited "purely editorial reasons".
Even so, the network's relationships with governments must bear closer examination. CNNi has aggressively pursued a business strategy of extensive, multifaceted financial arrangements between the network and several of the most repressive regimes around the world which the network purports to cover. Its financial dealings with Bahrain are deep and longstanding.
CNNi's pursuit of sponsorship revenue from the world's regimes

CNNi's pursuit of and reliance on revenue from Middle East regimes increased significantly after the 2008 financial crisis, which caused the network to suffer significant losses in corporate sponsorships. It thus pursued all-new, journalistically dubious ways to earn revenue from governments around the world. Bahrain has been one of the most aggressive government exploiters of the opportunities presented by CNNi.
These arrangements extend far beyond standard sponsorship agreements for advertising of the type most major media outlets feature. CNNi produces those programs in an arrangement it describes (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/08/09/world/sponsorships-policy/index.html) as "in association with" the government of a country, and offers regimes the ability to pay for specific programs about their country. These programs are then featured as part of CNNi's so-called "Eye on" series (http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/eye.on/index.html) ("Eye on Georgia (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/11/world/europe/eye-on-georgia-wine-embargo/index.html)", "Eye on the Phillipines (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/09/world/asia/ireport-eye-on-philippines/index.html)", "Eye on Poland (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/20/world/europe/eye-on-poland-food-chef/index.html)"), or "Marketplace Middle East (http://edition.cnn.com/CNNI/Programs/mme/index.html)", all of which is designed to tout the positive economic, social and political features of that country.
The disclosure for such arrangements is often barely visible. This year, for instance, CNNi produced an "Eye on Lebanon" series, which that nation's tourist minister boasted (http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Business/Lebanon/2012/May-09/172765-cnn-network-to-feature-eye-on-lebanon-for-tourism-promo.ashx#axzz25V2471Ia) was intended "to market Lebanon as a tourism destination". He said "his ministry was planning a large promotional campaign dubbed 'Eye on Lebanon' to feature on CNN network."
Yet one strains to find the faded, small disclosure print on this "Eye on Lebanon" page (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/08/10/world/meast/eye-on-lebanon-quiz/index.html), even if one is specifically searching for it. To the average viewer unaware of these government sponsorships, it appears to be standard "reporting" from the network.