PDA

View Full Version : Obama’s Having a Hard Time Finding Anyone to Serve on Death Panel



red states rule
01-29-2013, 05:00 AM
You mean Obama cannot find any abortion doctors to serve. They have plenty of experience in death.
Jonathan Gruber was one of the Obama administration’s key advisers during the health-care reform debate. As the economist who conceived the ideas at the heart of the Massachusetts health-care law, he is arguably the intellectual godfather of the Affordable Care Act.
All of which would make him a natural fit for the Independent Payment Advisory Board, the new, 15-member panel that has the authority to reduce Medicare doctors’ reimbursements and pilot new ways to deliver high quality care for less. There’s just one tiny problem: Gruber has absolutely no interest in serving on the panel. “No way,” he says without pause. “Maybe if it was a part-time gig. But full time? I can’t see it.”
It’s not just Gruber. Obama’s former health policy advisers worry that other top health economists, those in hot demand in academia and in the industry, won’t be interested in a federal job where the compensation is low, the political controversy high and the ultimate payoff unclear.
“It is supposed to be 15 members, with limited salaries who can’t do any outside work,” says Peter Orszag, the former director of the Office of Budget and Management under Obama who was a key proponent of IPAB. “It will be challenging to find top 15 health-care experts are who would want that job.”
“You’re joining an organization that has uncertain authority with the certainty of being deeply political and widely criticized,” says Bob Kocher, a former Obama health policy adviser. “It doesn’t make sense for current thought leaders in American health care to want this.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/28/who-wants-to-sit-in-the-hot-seat-on-a-federal-health-care-panel/

CSM
01-29-2013, 07:50 AM
Once again the "elite" (who think they know what's best for the country) disengage from the reality of their philosophy and the unforseen consequences of same when implemented. So much for "smarter than you"!

red states rule
01-30-2013, 04:54 AM
To bad Jack Kevorkian is dead - he would have been perfect for Obama's death panel

red states rule
02-06-2013, 03:22 AM
Maybe Paul would be happy to offer his services. Looks like Gov Palin was spot one after all





Last week New York Times economics columnist and liberal hero Paul Krugman actually said "death panels," the critique of Obama-care popularized by Sarah Palin and universally mocked by liberals, while discussing the necessity of cutting health care costs.


On January 30, Krugman spoke at the Sixth & I Historic Synagogue in D.C. (Krugman is out hawking the paperback edition of "End This Depression Now!," his paean to more government spending on infrastructure and other forms of stimulus.) During the Q&A, Breitbart's Joel Griffith (http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/02/04/Krugman-Death-panels-and-sales-taxes-is-how-we-do-this) noted, Krugman was asked (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9u2Lf0DdzA) about the rising national debt. A truncated version of his remarks follows:


We’re going to need more revenue, we're going to need, and probably in the end, surely in the end it will require some sort of middle class taxes as well. So again, we won’t be able to pay for the kind of government the society we want without some increase in taxes, not a huge one, but some increase on taxes on the middle class, maybe a value-added tax.... And we’re also going to do, really, we're going to have to make decisions about health care, not pay for health care that has no demonstrated medical benefits. So you know the snarky version I use, which is, I shouldn’t even say because it will get me in trouble, is death panels and sales taxes is how we do this."


This opens Krugman up to charges of hypocrisy, since he called the "death panel" accusation a "smear" in a March 22, 2010 column (http://www.mrc.org/articles/paul-krugman-sees-racial-hate-mongering-opposition-obama-care) and an example of the "dishonesty" of Obama-care opponents in a June 29, 2012 column (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/opinion/the-real-winners.html). Does this mean Krugman accepts Sarah Palin's argument that Obama-care's cost containment strategy will require health-care rationing?


Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/clay-waters/2013/02/05/kooky-paul-krugman-calls-death-panels-cut-health-care-costs-really#ixzz2KAFfMgSH