Little-Acorn
11-22-2012, 11:33 AM
Who says tomorrow's tax rates have to be higher than today's, for there to be a tax-rate increase?
For many years, when debating "spending cuts", politicians in both parties have said things like, "We had been planning to raise spending by 15%, but we've now decided to raise it only 10%. There you go, a 5% spending 'cut'!"
So why can't we do that to tax rate increases?
Simply make a plan to cut tax rates by 20% next year. Wait a month, then announce, "Well, we changed that plan. Now we'll only cut them 15% next year instead. There... we just increased tax rates by 5%!"
Problem solved. Liberals are happy because they get a 5% tax increase. And normal Americans are happy too, because they'll be paying 15% less taxes next year, than they did this year, on the same income.
No, no need to thank me. Happy to help out! :salute:
For many years, when debating "spending cuts", politicians in both parties have said things like, "We had been planning to raise spending by 15%, but we've now decided to raise it only 10%. There you go, a 5% spending 'cut'!"
So why can't we do that to tax rate increases?
Simply make a plan to cut tax rates by 20% next year. Wait a month, then announce, "Well, we changed that plan. Now we'll only cut them 15% next year instead. There... we just increased tax rates by 5%!"
Problem solved. Liberals are happy because they get a 5% tax increase. And normal Americans are happy too, because they'll be paying 15% less taxes next year, than they did this year, on the same income.
No, no need to thank me. Happy to help out! :salute: