If Romney won, would you be gloating now?

[gabosaurus]

I have gloated very little. Which is a lot different than what happened on this board's predecessor in 2004.
In case you don't remember, I am providing this link as a public service. :cool:


Hey libs/dems and any other of the arrogant that did nothing more than trash Bush and spell his defeat over the past year.

It brings joy to my heart knowing I will hear a few more years of the lib whining and complaining. I truly hope you guys aren't suicidal. Any of you packed your bags to leave the country yet? Let me know what airport you'll be departing from so I can come give you a proper send off.

Not only is Bush going to serve a second term but he has increased his support in the popular vote. So it appears all your conspiracy theories, bitching and whining just turned people away.

So I leave you with words from the immortal Toll Booth Willy:

"Eat shit, eat my shit!"

--jimnyc

[aboutime]

So, gabby comes here to GLOAT about NOT GLOATING?

Ignorance still is Bliss for Gabby.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

So, gabby comes here to GLOAT about NOT GLOATING?

Ignorance still is Bliss for Gabby.

Sure she doesnt gloat, She has only been as active as a beaver after a flood since obama won. How many posts in the last few days? Only about 20 times her normal amount. Ignorance is bliss and she has enough bliss to to fill a stadium.-Tyr

[aboutime]

Sure she doesnt gloat, She has only been as active as a beaver after a flood since obama won. How many posts in the last few days? Only about 20 times her normal amount. Ignorance is bliss and she has enough bliss to to fill a stadium.-Tyr


Tyr. But. You have to understand. Gabby is so much smarter than the rest of us. She's honestly convinced. Nobody would notice what you mentioned above.

That alone, is gloating. Pretending to be the SMARTEST person here, and failing. Just typical liberal BS wrapped up in a bow named GABBY.

[gabosaurus]

You people haven't seen REAL gloating yet... :cool:

http://whitepeoplemourningromney.tumblr.com/

[jimnyc]

I have gloated very little. Which is a lot different than what happened on this board's predecessor in 2004.
In case you don't remember, I am providing this link as a public service. :cool:


--jimnyc

I would consider gloating to me more of an unprovoked action at non-deserving people. Considering the liberal nitwits that were ever present starting trouble and acting like retards, the message was directed at them. When people TROLL my board, and then something happens that might annoy them, I'll rub it in their faces. Trolls like yourself were a dime a dozen back then and thought it funny to ruin thread after thread after thread with your anti-Bush crap, so I tossed a little toll booth willy into your faces. I couldn't think of more deserving trash talkers and imbeciles deserving, yourself included.

[jimnyc]

And now for the 2nd person in 9 years, the other being banned - and to show others what to do when someone aggravates you, instead of turning the board into a bitchfest and place for personal insults. I've found it best at times that when you find something that makes you angry, just take yourself out of the situation. Why I've waited so long to do the following is beyond me, but I'm tired of people who try and act like your friend and then try to start trouble literally an hour later.

Smarter than you are
This message is hidden because gabosaurus is on your ignore list
Remove user from ignore list

[gabosaurus]

Why are you taking this as a personal insult? I am merely pointing out that the same gripes and complaints that surfaced in 2004 are present today. Go back and read what was written.


Considering the liberal nitwits that were ever present starting trouble and acting like retards, the message was directed at them.

Considering the conservative nitwits that are ever present on this board, starting trouble and acting like morons, this thread is directed at them.

And if Jim is still reading, or if another mod wants to relay this: Jim, this board is YOURS. You alone determine who can post here. If I annoy you that much, just push the EJECT button. Simple as that.

[avatar4321]

No. I was actually planning to console my liberal friends, despite some of them being jerks during the campaign.

[PostmodernProphet]

If Romney won, would you be gloating now? (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?37687-If-Romney-won-would-you-be-gloating-now)

yes....and looking forward to recovery......now, neither is going to happen.....

[aboutime]

yes....and looking forward to recovery......now, neither is going to happen.....



I keep hearing that same, tired chant of "FOUR MORE YEARS". Reminding me to be thankful my grandchildren are all, still too young to understand, or be held responsible for the HUGE tax burden the AMERICAN PEOPLE VOTED FOR on Tuesday.

There is no such thing as RECOVERY even possible until after 2016.

Until then. We are literally going BARRACKWARD!

[tailfins]

I wouldn't be gloating; I would be buying stuff in anticipation of the economic recovery.

[aboutime]

I wouldn't be gloating; I would be buying stuff in anticipation of the economic recovery.


tailfins. You just spoke for possibly TWO THIRDS of our entire population. Just look at the number of small, and large businesses that have begun to announce LAYOFFS, or telling people they are not going to hire any more employee's BECAUSE OF Obamacare.

This is only the beginning for America. The selfish, stingy Americans who only voted for Obama for what they were told, and convinced, would be MORE Obama Bucks in their hands. All without any of them taking the time to think about where...NOTHING comes from.

Sad truth is. We are becoming GREECE, FRANCE, LIBYA, IRAN, IRAQ Mirror Images. And those people who voted for Obama are too dumb to notice, or bother thinking about it.

The WORST is yet to come. Just watch what the month of January brings to all of the DUMBEST AMERICANS.

[tailfins]

tailfins. You just spoke for possibly TWO THIRDS of our entire population. Just look at the number of small, and large businesses that have begun to announce LAYOFFS, or telling people they are not going to hire any more employee's BECAUSE OF Obamacare.

This is only the beginning for America. The selfish, stingy Americans who only voted for Obama for what they were told, and convinced, would be MORE Obama Bucks in their hands. All without any of them taking the time to think about where...NOTHING comes from.

Sad truth is. We are becoming GREECE, FRANCE, LIBYA, IRAN, IRAQ Mirror Images. And those people who voted for Obama are too dumb to notice, or bother thinking about it.

The WORST is yet to come. Just watch what the month of January brings to all of the DUMBEST AMERICANS.

To be fair: The last three years turned out better than I expected. That there turned out to be any pockets of prosperity was a pleasant surprise.

[SassyLady]

Gabby, I didn't gloat when Bush won in 2004 or 2008, so I probably would not have gloated if Romney won. I would, however, be a lot less stressed if Romney had won, and I might have mentioned that. I might have also pointed out all the good things he was working on .... but you might find that to be gloating.

Instead, I get to spend the next four years pointing out the idiocy of those who voted for him.

[mundame]

No point in gloating.

Obama was bad; Romney would probably have been bad too.

We had bad candidates, that's all.


I would have preferred Romney won because I don't like socialism (!) and at least Romney isn't a socialist like Obama. Also because Obama failed; it's been a bad four years. And when a prez fails, it makes sense to switch them out for almost anyone else.

But I don't vote for evils in any form anymore, not lesser evils or greater evils.

Maybe people would like to vote for a normal, inspiring candidate. Just a thought. If the GOP could scare one of them up from somewhere. Probably won't, though. They'll just go on and on nominating weirdos. That's all they've got anymore, I guess.

[gabosaurus]

No point in gloating.

Obama was bad; Romney would probably have been bad too.

We had bad candidates, that's all.


I think a lot of people were so turned off by the choice that they passed on the election. Others turned up because they were afraid of the uncertainty of a Romney administration.
You don't have to be the better candidate to run a better campaign. As the incumbent, Obama was able to organize his forces and map out his strategy before the GOP ever decided on a candidate.
Dems feared a Bush apocalypse in his second term. It didn't happen.
The same gloom and doom threats by Republicans will fail to come to pass. Doesn't mean you can't whine about it, though.

[mundame]

The same gloom and doom threats by Republicans will fail to come to pass. Doesn't mean you can't whine about it, though.



Well, thank God for that freedom, anyway. :rolleyes:

[gabosaurus]

I was perusing another forum and found a post that expressed similar feelings to what I have been thinking for the last month.
Won't link to the post (board rules) but will reprint the words of the wise poster:


Hey Conservatives/republicans and any other of the arrogant that did nothing more than trash Obama and spell his defeat over the past year.

It brings joy to my heart knowing I will hear a few more years of the conservative whining and complaining. I truly hope you guys aren't suicidal. Any of you packed your bags to leave the country yet? Let me know what airport you'll be departing from so I can come give you a proper send off.

Not only is Obama going to serve a second term but he has increased his support in the popular vote. So it appears all your conspiracy theories, bitching and whining just turned people away.

[jimnyc]

Please keep your trash in one place. And then kindly fuck off.

[gabosaurus]

Someone remains whiny and pouty. And ignoring all the multitude of "our country is DOOMED!" threads.

But it's your party and you can cry if you want to. :cool:

[tailfins]

Someone remains whiny and pouty. And ignoring all the multitude of "our country is DOOMED!" threads.

But it's your party and you can cry if you want to. :cool:

I have only recently come to appreciate your taunting skills without name calling. Your writings are an acquired taste. You add spice to DP.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I think a lot of people were so turned off by the choice that they passed on the election. Others turned up because they were afraid of the uncertainty of a Romney administration.
You don't have to be the better candidate to run a better campaign. As the incumbent, Obama was able to organize his forces and map out his strategy before the GOP ever decided on a candidate.
Dems feared a Bush apocalypse in his second term. It didn't happen.
The same gloom and doom threats by Republicans will fail to come to pass. Doesn't mean you can't whine about it, though.

Hey genius, obama has been running for a second term starting the day he was sworn in for the first. Complete with a sold out lying and protecting media. Its you gloating by posting this trash and pretending he isnt the disaster that he is.
Bush isnt an obama type so dem fears were groundless. Fears of obama's corruption and extremism are base upon fact. You are just to stupid to have even the slightest knowledge od reality. Have your cheerleading boy tailfins to explain it all to you.-:laugh2:--Tyr

[jimnyc]

I have only recently come to appreciate your taunting skills without name calling. Your writings are an acquired taste. You add spice to DP.

Kind of like people into SCAT. I doubt they liked it from the day they were born, but grew into their "abilities".

[Larrymc]

I have gloated very little. Which is a lot different than what happened on this board's predecessor in 2004.
In case you don't remember, I am providing this link as a public service. :cool:


--jimnychave you missed an opportunity to Gloate, Do Tell

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I have only recently come to appreciate your taunting skills without name calling. Your writings are an acquired taste. You add spice to DP.

Sure you have, only just recently . :laugh2:
Acquired tastes? Yep, like eating mountain oysters.. :laugh:--Tyr

[aboutime]

I have only recently come to appreciate your taunting skills without name calling. Your writings are an acquired taste. You add spice to DP.



tailfins. Sounds like you and Gabby were made for each other. Bet you both are trying to keep it secret about being related.

[Larrymc]

I was perusing another forum and found a post that expressed similar feelings to what I have been thinking for the last month.
Won't link to the post (board rules) but will reprint the words of the wise poster:now Obama fans have four more years to here we told you so

[Robert A Whit]

If anyone needs a reason to not like Obama, just look at this nations deficits. I advise you to use the link for a more complete understanding of the problems. The person below did a decent job. <o:p></o:p>http://home.adelphi.edu/sbloch/deficits.htmlTable 2: The Top Ten Years<o:p></o:p>I have in my hand a copy of tonight's Top Ten list.... <o:p></o:p>


2008-2009, at $879 billion (transition from G. W. Bush to B. H. Obama)<o:p></o:p>
2009-2010, at $758 billion (B. H. Obama)<o:p></o:p>
2010-2011, at $549 billion (B. H. Obama)<o:p></o:p>
2011-2012, at $535 billion (B. H. Obama)<o:p></o:p>
2007-2008, at $472 billion (G. W. Bush)<o:p></o:p>
1942-1943, at $372 billion (F. D. Roosevelt)<o:p></o:p>
1943-1944, at $365 billion (F. D. Roosevelt)<o:p></o:p>
1944-1945, at $320 billion (transition from F. D. Roosevelt to H. S. Truman)<o:p></o:p>
1990-1991, at $317 billion (G. H. W. Bush)<o:p></o:p>
2003-2004, at $315 billion (G. W. Bush)<o:p></o:p>

<!-- 2002-2003, at $302 billion (G. W. Bush)
1989-1990, at $287 billion (G. H. W. Bush)
-->All of those figures are inflation-adjusted, of course.

[Kathianne]

Kind of like people into SCAT. I doubt they liked it from the day they were born, but grew into their "abilities".

I'm more concerned that Obama seems to be 'running' for a third term. Last I checked, not allowed.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I'm more concerned that Obama seems to be 'running' for a third term. Last I checked, not allowed.

I too share that concern!! Could be that he plans on making changes that WOULD let him run again! He damn sure is conceited enough and certainly contempteous enough to try that!--Tyr

[aboutime]

I too share that concern!! Could be that he plans on making changes that WOULD let him run again! He damn sure is conceited enough and certainly contempteous enough to try that!--Tyr


That can only happen if the Numbers, and Qualifications announced in the Constitution are followed, and met.

Besides. Everyone should know by now. Chelsea Clinton is getting MOM ready for her run in 2016.

Bubba, and Hillary have probably worked all of that out...as part of some deal with Obama already.

UNLESS...Barrack Obama suddenly becomes the NEW Hugo Chavez of the Democrat Party in the Socialist Republic of Stupidity.

[Larrymc]

I too share that concern!! Could be that he plans on making changes that WOULD let him run again! He damn sure is conceited enough and certainly contempteous enough to try that!--Tyrhe has four years to revel him self as the Anti-Christ, or get out

[aboutime]

he has four years to revel him self as the Anti-Christ, or get out


That aint gonna happen Larrymc. At least the Anti-Christ has a brain, and knows how to use it.

[Larrymc]

That aint gonna happen Larrymc. At least the Anti-Christ has a brain, and knows how to use it.Aaa but can't he get more done acting like a fool, his fans will just keep making accuses, while the damage is being done

[gabosaurus]

I'm more concerned that Obama seems to be 'running' for a third term. Last I checked, not allowed.

I thought the same thing during Dubya's second term. Radical Dems thought Dubya would declare martial law in 2008 and declare himself dictator for life. ConReps mocked them thoroughly.
Interesting to see how ConReps are acting now that the shoe is squarely planted on the other foot.