Obama betrays victims of Terror Attack-Fort Hood

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-betrays-victims-of-fort-hood-terror/

President Barack Hussein Obama refuses to designate Hasan’s assault on Fort Hood as terrorism even though Hasan referred to himself as a “soldier of Islam.” As a result of Obama’s refusal, the families of the dead and the injured have been refused combat compensation.
President Obama will not even issue Purple Hearts to the victims – not to the families of the dead, and not to those who were wounded.
Barack Obama and his Department of Defense insist Hasan’s attack was mere “workplace violence” and was “isolated” and therefore not terrorism or combat. Yet President Obama ordered the assassination of Hasan’s jihadist partner and instructor in the attack, American-born al-Qaida collaborator Anwar al-Awlaki. A CIA drone killed al-Awlaki and several others in Yemen in September 2011. It was the first execution ever of a U.S. citizen without trial by our government.
If Maj. Nidal Hasan acted alone and the jihad attack at Fort Hood was mere “workplace violence,” why was retribution required on al-Awlaki? Because the killing wasn’t retribution at all; it was because Obama needed to shut al-Awlaki up and stop his bragging about the attack on Fort Hood. With al-Awlaki taking credit for the shooting, Obama could not classify it as “workplace violence.” All those involved other than Hasan had to be eliminated.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

And why hasnt this ffing scum been executed yet???
Is the any doubt about him being guilty?
Any decent President would have as CIC pushed for a speedy trial. Obama likely hopes to become dictator then release the guy. Put nothing past this muslim in hiding.-Tyr

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-betrays-victims-of-fort-hood-terror/

President Barack Hussein Obama refuses to designate Hasan’s assault on Fort Hood as terrorism even though Hasan referred to himself as a “soldier of Islam.” As a result of Obama’s refusal, the families of the dead and the injured have been refused combat compensation.
President Obama will not even issue Purple Hearts to the victims – not to the families of the dead, and not to those who were wounded.
Barack Obama and his Department of Defense insist Hasan’s attack was mere “workplace violence” and was “isolated” and therefore not terrorism or combat. Yet President Obama ordered the assassination of Hasan’s jihadist partner and instructor in the attack, American-born al-Qaida collaborator Anwar al-Awlaki. A CIA drone killed al-Awlaki and several others in Yemen in September 2011. It was the first execution ever of a U.S. citizen without trial by our government.
If Maj. Nidal Hasan acted alone and the jihad attack at Fort Hood was mere “workplace violence,” why was retribution required on al-Awlaki? Because the killing wasn’t retribution at all; it was because Obama needed to shut al-Awlaki up and stop his bragging about the attack on Fort Hood. With al-Awlaki taking credit for the shooting, Obama could not classify it as “workplace violence.” All those involved other than Hasan had to be eliminated.

This alone should be enough reason to not vote for the ffing bastard. There was a time in this nation's history when this would have sealed a president's defeat at the polls. Yet we barely even see it mentioned at all. Why?
Because the media controls most of the narrative and goes overboard in protecting Islam. As does obama. Israel will find out if obama gets another term , he will stab Israel in the back and support his arab/muslim brothers IMHO.-Tyr

[glockmail]

If it was correctly called an act of terrorism then The Obama would be guilty of not protecting the US from an act of terror.

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

If it was correctly called an act of terrorism then The Obama would be guilty of not protecting the US from an act of terror.

Dead on accurate, obama wants to look like he makes no mistakes ever! I think he actually believes that too.-Tyr

[aboutime]

We all know. Obama and his lying friends MUST call what took place at FORT HOOD, workplace attack, rather than label it as Terrorism because. After all of his APOLOGIES to our known enemies, after he took office. It would make him look less comforting to our Enemies whom he must always portray as future candidates for his HUGE PUCKER...to keep them happy. While the American people who do not believe in OBAMA'S Phony claims when he lies, and tells us he is a Christian. Know. Obama is just protecting his LYING BUTT.

[aboutime]

Dead on accurate, obama wants to look like he makes no mistakes ever! I think he actually believes that too.-Tyr



Obama may want us to believe he never makes any mistakes. Which explains why he is unable to remember WHAT ORDER he has told his more than ONE HUNDRED....recorded lies to the American people.
Just another case, presented by Obama. As to how telling ONE lie leads to a SECOND, and a THIRD. All of which were intended to cover up for the First...which Obama rarely remembers himself after convincing Himself...even his lies are believable eventually.

[jafar00]

Would you call the shootings in Norway an act of terrorism?

[aboutime]

Would you call the shootings in Norway an act of terrorism?



Any shootings, that result in the death of any human being, anywhere in the world IS AN ACT OF TERRORISM...to the victim.