Five reasons to vote for Romney

[Robert A Whit]

I would value comments. I also would value any person that passes this video around to his list.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKOem7wiVIQ&feature=player_embedded

[Tyr-Ziu Saxnot]

I would value comments. I also would value any person that passes this video around to his list.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKOem7wiVIQ&feature=player_embedded

Absolutely the greatest video on obama the curse I 've ever watched!
Every word of it the truth!-- :beer:----Tyr

[tailfins]

It might be helpful for GOTV (Get Out The Vote), but won't help with undecided voters. As someone who was for Romney before supporting Romney was cool, the video seems somewhat extreme and alarmist. It might take 20 years to recover from a Obama second term, but we will recover regardless.

[fj1200]

Economy, economy, economy, economy, conservative justices.

[Robert A Whit]

You have nothing to lose by passing around the youtube video

I appreciate the comments thus far. One poster (Tyr) proclaims it is true. Two other posters did not give me a good reason to not let their list make judgement.

Let er fly. I sent it to Obama loyalists and hope they will see it. As to the non converts to Romney, things go viral on the internet. I am sure this is going viral. If you want to participate, fine. If not, also fine.

[aboutime]

I would value comments. I also would value any person that passes this video around to his list.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKOem7wiVIQ&feature=player_embedded


No American alive should have to even think about telling our Children, and Grandchildren...or their children. "What it WAS like in the America we grew up in...TO BE FREE."

Is there anyone out there who refuses to admit what Obama wants to do if he is re-elected?

[gabosaurus]

Economy, economy, economy, economy, conservative justices.

The Supreme Court has five conservative justices too many right now.

[red states rule]

The Supreme Court has five conservative justices too many right now.

Good thing we have at least 4 Justices who go by the US Constitutio0n Gabby or the entire nation would look like CA

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/lb1020cd20121019082317.jpg

[Robert A Whit]

We should send 4 justices back to college so they might learn the actual constitution.

I don't much care for the way the special word liberal gets used. They do not conform to the meaning of the term liberal. They don't much like the actual constitution. They think it simply is lingering until they change it.

[KarlMarx]

I would value comments. I also would value any person that passes this video around to his list.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKOem7wiVIQ&feature=player_embedded

I can think of one good reason to vote for Romney

Vanna, can I buy a vowel? I'd like an "O"

[fj1200]

The Supreme Court has five conservative justices too many right now.

And here I was thinking we were 5 short. :slap:

[fj1200]

I appreciate the comments thus far. One poster (Tyr) proclaims it is true. Two other posters did not give me a good reason to not let their list make judgement.

So you were just looking for some validation rather than our particular reasons? My mistake.

[tailfins]

I can think of one good reason to vote for Romney

Vanna, can I buy a vowel? I'd like an "O"

I would like to solve the puzzle: Z-E-R-O

Even his logo proclaims he is President Zero: Two-ZERO-One-Two

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Obama-2012-logo.jpg

[aboutime]

I would like to solve the puzzle: Z-E-R-O

Even his logo proclaims he is President Zero: Two-ZERO-One-Two

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Obama-2012-logo.jpg


I believe Obama is secretly using that Logo to subliminally tell all of us his ZERO "IQ", when it comes to anything other than Lies.

[aboutime]

And here I was thinking we were 5 short. :slap:



fj1200. PLEASE feel free to use your other hand when you count.

[fj1200]

fj1200. PLEASE feel free to use your other hand when you count.

Not necessary, besides I'm busy smacking libs around with it.

[aboutime]

Not necessary, besides I'm busy smacking libs around with it.


Be careful. The Obama Chumps might accuse you of creating more "BUMPS IN THE ROAD."

[fj1200]

Be careful. The Obama Chumps might accuse you of creating more "BUMPS IN THE ROAD."

:confused:

[Classic Liberal]

So, bombing hell out of born and unborn babies is better than aborting babies and voting for Romney is better because he favors the latter?

So, even though the 9th amendment guarantees rights to people as long as they don’t infringe any right of other people and the 14th amendment guarantees equal protection of the law and the Constitution doesn’t give any power to the federal government to decide what a marriage contract is, voting for Romney is a good idea because he is opposed to Constitutional guarantees?

So, voting for Romney is a good idea because Republicans have a stellar track record at controlling the national debt?

So, since Israel decided to create their nation smack dab in the middle of their sworn enemies, it’s a good idea to vote for Romney because he’ll defend Israel with “America’s” blood and treasure?

So, it’s a great idea to vote for Romney/Ryan because the “Ryan Plan” balances the federal budget in 30 years even though 15 different Congresses will have their say about that every 2 years?

Looks like several reasons to NOT vote for Romney or Obama to me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

[aboutime]

So, bombing hell out of born and unborn babies is better than aborting babies and voting for Romney is better because he favors the latter?

So, even though the 9th amendment guarantees rights to people as long as they don’t infringe any right of other people and the 14th amendment guarantees equal protection of the law and the Constitution doesn’t give any power to the federal government to decide what a marriage contract is, voting for Romney is a good idea because he is opposed to Constitutional guarantees?

So, voting for Romney is a good idea because Republicans have a stellar track record at controlling the national debt?

So, since Israel decided to create their nation smack dab in the middle of their sworn enemies, it’s a good idea to vote for Romney because he’ll defend Israel with “America’s” blood and treasure?

So, it’s a great idea to vote for Romney/Ryan because the “Ryan Plan” balances the federal budget in 30 years even though 15 different Congresses will have their say about that every 2 years?

Looks like several reasons to NOT vote for Romney or Obama to me, I voted for Gary Johnson.



ClassicLiberal. Go right ahead and vote for whoever you want. Remember. Our Constitution will never prevent you from doing dumb things, like wasting your vote. Nobody can take that away from you. If you think Gary Johnson will WIN. Vote for him.
Otherwise. Vote for Obama. You'll get the same results.

[Classic Liberal]

ClassicLiberal. Go right ahead and vote for whoever you want. Remember. Our Constitution will never prevent you from doing dumb things, like wasting your vote. Nobody can take that away from you. If you think Gary Johnson will WIN. Vote for him.
Otherwise. Vote for Obama. You'll get the same results.

The only way one can waste a vote, is to vote for the status-quo BIG government Socialist Anti-Constitution Duopoly Dictatorship.

I know Gary Johnson won’t win, but I will! I’ll have voted my principles that are in lockstep with our Constitution. The day after the election I’ll still be a proud constitutionalist and you’ll be disappointed again no matter who wins.

[jimnyc]

The only way one can waste a vote, is to vote for the status-quo BIG government Socialist Anti-Constitution Duopoly Dictatorship.

I know Gary Johnson won’t win, but I will! I’ll have voted my principles that are in lockstep with our Constitution. The day after the election I’ll still be a proud constitutionalist and you’ll be disappointed again no matter who wins.

You take issue with both Romney and Obama. You know your candidate WON'T win. And yet somehow want us to think YOU won't be disappointed on election day? That's comical. :laugh2:

[Abbey Marie]

Economy, economy, economy, economy, conservative justices.



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Dunking.jpg/220px-Dunking.jpg

[Noir]

Um, I'm I the only one to notice that the 'five reasons to vote for Romney' are actually 'five reasons to vote against Obama'?

[Abbey Marie]

So, bombing hell out of born and unborn babies is better than aborting babies and voting for Romney is better because he favors the latter? YES

So, even though the 9th amendment guarantees rights to people as long as they don’t infringe any right of other people and the 14th amendment guarantees equal protection of the law and the Constitution doesn’t give any power to the federal government to decide what a marriage contract is, voting for Romney is a good idea because he is opposed to Constitutional guarantees? YES

So, voting for Romney is a good idea because Republicans have a stellar track record at controlling the national debt? YES

So, since Israel decided to create their nation smack dab in the middle of their sworn enemies, it’s a good idea to vote for Romney because he’ll defend Israel with “America’s” blood and treasure? Incorrectly stated, but YES

So, it’s a great idea to vote for Romney/Ryan because the “Ryan Plan” balances the federal budget in 30 years even though 15 different Congresses will have their say about that every 2 years? YES

Looks like several reasons to NOT vote for Romney or Obama to me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

Vote for whomever you wish. But don't tell me I am wrong for choosing my candidate.

[Abbey Marie]

Um, I'm I the only one to notice that the 'five reasons to vote for Romney' are actually 'five reasons to vote against Obama'?

Well, I LOVE the new hair!

[jimnyc]

Um, I'm I the only one to notice that the 'five reasons to vote for Romney' are actually 'five reasons to vote against Obama'?

And while it may not be perfect, if Romney is even slightly better for our country than Obama, it's good enough reason. Fact is though, a lobotomized monkey could do better than Obama and the shitty democrat lead congress.

[tailfins]

Um, I'm I the only one to notice that the 'five reasons to vote for Romney' are actually 'five reasons to vote against Obama'?

No you're not. The video is only a "winner" in the sense to get former Perry-Gingrich-Santorum supporters to the polls. It won't play well to early Romney supporters nor undecided voters.

[aboutime]

Um, I'm I the only one to notice that the 'five reasons to vote for Romney' are actually 'five reasons to vote against Obama'?



Is that all you noticed, Noir? I noticed you managed not to stutter while you told all of us about that.

Who cares what you noticed? Do you really think the other, more than 310 Million other Americans who never visit this Forum, noticed what you said here?

[Robert A Whit]

So you were just looking for some validation rather than our particular reasons? My mistake.

WARNING FORUM

Above post amounts to a strawman.

[Noir]

Well, I LOVE the new hair!

D'aw ^,^
My gf likes it too, but my Grandmothers reaction was more along the lines of "For Jesus's sake would you look at that hair!"

[Noir]

Is that all you noticed, Noir? I noticed you managed not to stutter while you told all of us about that.

Who cares what you noticed? Do you really think the other, more than 310 Million other Americans who never visit this Forum, noticed what you said here?

I couldn't give two monkeys for the other 300 million+.
You noticed, that's all that matters. (:

[Robert A Whit]

Vote for whomever you wish. But don't tell me I am wrong for choosing my candidate.


So, bombing hell out of born and unborn babies is better than aborting babies and voting for Romney is better because he favors the latter? (strawman)

So, even though the 9th amendment guarantees rights to people as long as they don’t infringe any right of other people and the 14th amendment guarantees equal protection of the law and the Constitution doesn’t give any power to the federal government to decide what a marriage contract is, voting for Romney is a good idea because he is opposed to Constitutional guarantees? (Other than tax policy, along with the DOMA, the Feds are not involved with marriage)(also, Romney is not opposed to the constitution)

So, voting for Romney is a good idea because Republicans have a stellar track record at controlling the national debt? (Put this into context. When Bush ran up the debt, and per the Obama line of thinking, federal spending boosts the economy, all we heard from democrats as they added billions of debt using parliamentary rules is that more debt is bad. LOL I may be one of the few that actually studied the Bush budgets and noticed that by the time Congress got done, the actual end budget was always boosted by congress. Make no mistake, the Democrats did it to hurt Bush IMO No president even with adjustments to the dollar, spends remotely as much as Obama has. Practicing his voo doo brand of economics.)

So, since Israel decided to create their nation smack dab in the middle of their sworn enemies, it’s a good idea to vote for Romney because he’ll defend Israel with “America’s” blood and treasure?
The UN did it. (create Israel) Israel was attacked right away and won that war. Romney has never said he plans to send troops there. Any who has lived to be as old as I am knows of the wars that the Arabs have fought with Israel and how easy it has been for the Arabs to suffer defeat. They don't need our help.)

So, it’s a great idea to vote for Romney/Ryan because the “Ryan Plan” balances the federal budget in 30 years even though 15 different Congresses will have their say about that every 2 years?
Obama has done so much damage that you may be making a good point. I would love to point out that if you can get almost all of the out of work 23 million back to work, their contribution to the economy overall will produce a lot more revenue to the Feds. Even if they don't pay a dime more in income taxes, their spending drives up the incomes of others who will pay those income taxes.

Looks like several reasons to NOT vote for Romney or Obama to me, I voted for Gary Johnson.
Why did you bother to vote? Remember when people such as you cast a vote for Ross Perot? Did that help them at all?

[Robert A Whit]

D'aw ^,^
My gf likes it too, but my Grandmothers reaction was more along the lines of "For Jesus's sake would you look at that hair!"

Are you actually an Athiest?

Does your GF ever shout out, OH GOD!!!

Maybe you need to rethink that then.

[red states rule]

http://files.fbstatic.com/PostImages/178665/0/8e649903-1b3f-4bf5-a3f6-d2a97c5f2c0f.jpg

[Noir]

Are you actually an Athiest?

Does your GF ever shout out, OH GOD!!!

Maybe you need to rethink that then.

Yup, a real, living, breathing athiest (:

As I'm sure she does, but I don't understand what ya mean...

[red states rule]

Yup, a real, living, breathing athiest (:

As I'm sure she does, but I don't understand what ya mean...


No problem

After you die you will understand and in the meantime I will pray for your soul Noir

[red states rule]

You know the kook left is starting to see the election slip away when they freak out on their little listened radio show

Enjoy Sgt Schultz damn near stroking out as he screams at women for trending toward Mitt


<iframe title="MRC TV video player" height="299" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/117687" frameBorder="0" width="370" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>

[KarlMarx]

How about

L https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/2213118877/Obama_logo_reasonably_small.png S E
2 https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/2213118877/Obama_logo_reasonably_small.png 1 2

[Robert A Whit]

Yup, a real, living, breathing athiest (:

As I'm sure she does, but I don't understand what ya mean...

When she screams out loud, OH GOD, maybe she thinks you are GOD. Certainly though being the true non believer, you explain to her in stern terms, HEY BABY, der aint no god.

BTW, sorry to find out your barber moved so far away from you that you missed his services.

I admit to having let myself go like you did more than one time.

[Abbey Marie]

D'aw ^,^
My gf likes it too, but my Grandmothers reaction was more along the lines of "For Jesus's sake would you look at that hair!"

Grandmom is just nervous 'cause you have that tousled, "I was just in bed with someone" look. :cool:

[Classic Liberal]

You take issue with both Romney and Obama. You know your candidate WON'T win. And yet somehow want us to think YOU won't be disappointed on election day? That's comical. :laugh2:

Since I’m perfectly accepting of the fact that my favored candidate cannot win, why would I be disappointed when he doesn’t?

You see Jimmy, I totally understand the rigged duopoly dictatorship political system. I don’t give a squat about WINNING because only the corrupt can win in a corrupt political system, Thus my vote is always based solely on PRINCIPLE and my desire to make a protest statement.

After the election I’ll still be a proud principled person having made a peaceful protest, but those who have voted for the corrupt status-quo will surely be disappointed if their half of the duopoly loses, and those who voted for the winning half of the duopoly’s status-quo will very soon after the election also be disappointed when they realize what they’ve done.

[Classic Liberal]

Vote for whomever you wish. But don't tell me I am wrong for choosing my candidate.

“Your” vote is yours to decide right or wrong, just don’t blame me for your mistake, I voted for Gary Johnson.

[Classic Liberal]

Why did you bother to vote? Remember when people such as you cast a vote for Ross Perot? Did that help them at all?

You betcha! If we remember correctly, Ross Perot’s campaign agenda was the deficits and national debt. He made Clinton and Bush One look like morons in the debates when he pressed the debt issue, especially when he was accused of not having governing “experience” and he replied, “you’re right, I don’t have any experience at running up trillions of dollars of debt.”

The moral of my rant here is the fact that even though Clinton won the election, and Republicans controlled most of the Congress for much of the Clinton watch, they balanced the budget, thus THE NATION was helped a plenty at least until the crooks determined that the revelation of their corrupt spending habits, deficits and debt as revealed by Perot had blown over and the nation had forgotten about it and they started their spending spree all over again and put it on steroids.

Anyhow, I vote for constitutional principles whenever a candidate makes my ballot who has shown to be a constitutionalist. Otherwise when none like that appear, I don’t vote it just encourages the bastards.

[Abbey Marie]

“Your” vote is yours to decide right or wrong, just don’t blame me for your mistake, I voted for Gary Johnson.

There you go again, implying I might be voting "wrong".

[aboutime]

“Your” vote is yours to decide right or wrong, just don’t blame me for your mistake, I voted for Gary Johnson.



Classic Liberal. Unlike you. None of us have to blame you for being so irresponsible, and downright silly. I hope you did vote for Gary Johnson.

Let us know how that works out on November 7th.

[mundame]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Robert A Whithttp://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=587018#post587018)Why did you bother to vote? Remember when people such as you cast a vote for Ross Perot? Did that help them at all?





Wait ---- is voting supposed to be about "helping people," like giving out lots of extra food stamps or making war on benighted Afghans to "help" them?

I voted for Perot, but it never occurred to me to suppose it was about helping people. I just thought he'd be the best president. Well, admittedly, after Perot quit the race once, my faith in him got a little tarnished, but I did it anyway.

I don't think the theory of democracy has anything to do with "helping" people with one's vote.

[mundame]

Anyway, I can't vote for Gary Johnson: he's too short.

Everybody knows short men can't be president: only above-average tall men have been president for 150 years or more.

[aboutime]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Robert A Whithttp://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=587018#post587018)Why did you bother to vote? Remember when people such as you cast a vote for Ross Perot? Did that help them at all?





Wait ---- is voting supposed to be about "helping people," like giving out lots of extra food stamps or making war on benighted Afghans to "help" them?

I voted for Perot, but it never occurred to me to suppose it was about helping people. I just thought he'd be the best president. Well, admittedly, after Perot quit the race once, my faith in him got a little tarnished, but I did it anyway.

I don't think the theory of democracy has anything to do with "helping" people with one's vote.



Democracy IS NOT a theory. Democracy. In it's purest form. Is a dangerous way for any society to grow.
Eventually. In a Pure Democracy. If you have more neighbors who dislike you. They can, and will take everything you own, and the government will help them, until government takes it from them as well.
Better known as MOB RULE. If you, or anyone else thinks Democracy works.
That bridge in New York City is your's for whatever price....others want you to pay.

[fj1200]

Anyway, I can't vote for Gary Johnson: he's too short.

Everybody knows short men can't be president: only above-average tall men have been president for 150 years or more.

Kudos for sticking with your principles. :rolleyes:

[mundame]

Democracy IS NOT a theory. Democracy. In it's purest form. Is a dangerous way for any society to grow.
Eventually. In a Pure Democracy. If you have more neighbors who dislike you. They can, and will take everything you own, and the government will help them, until government takes it from them as well.
Better known as MOB RULE. If you, or anyone else thinks Democracy works.
That bridge in New York City is your's for whatever price....others want you to pay.


Good points. I, too, am no longer a fan of democracy. "The government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always count on the support of Paul."

[mundame]

Kudos for sticking with your principles. :rolleyes:


One must have some standards........... ;)

[aboutime]

One must have some standards........... ;)



Standards? That's a good one.

[Abbey Marie]

One must have some standards........... ;)

Hang in there, Mundame. Humor is often misunderstood here on DP. And probably on all other debate sites as well. ;)

[red states rule]

One reason to vote for Romney is to stick to Obama's base after the BOO a nine year girl for saying Mitt should win the election

Libs are so classy folks


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/msnbc-crowd-boos-9-year-old-girl-for-supporting-romney/#ooid=twb2diNjru7M5Ksza0-otad3E4AIHGlO

[red states rule]

One must have some standards........... ;)

So is bigotry one of your standards?

[Robert A Whit]

You betcha! If we remember correctly, Ross Perot’s campaign agenda was the deficits and national debt. He made Clinton and Bush One look like morons in the debates when he pressed the debt issue, especially when he was accused of not having governing “experience” and he replied, “you’re right, I don’t have any experience at running up trillions of dollars of debt.”

The moral of my rant here is the fact that even though Clinton won the election, and Republicans controlled most of the Congress for much of the Clinton watch, they balanced the budget, thus THE NATION was helped a plenty at least until the crooks determined that the revelation of their corrupt spending habits, deficits and debt as revealed by Perot had blown over and the nation had forgotten about it and they started their spending spree all over again and put it on steroids.

Anyhow, I vote for constitutional principles whenever a candidate makes my ballot who has shown to be a constitutionalist. Otherwise when none like that appear, I don’t vote it just encourages the bastards.

As a person that was not pleased that despite the democrats tricking Reagan into a budget deal, and Bush 41 being in the middle of it, that he proceeded to let them try to trick him again and he broke a promise.

So, I too took a good look at Perot. I happen to have studied Perot since around 1968 so realized what he said made sense.

I was still making up my mind and suddenly he quit. Much later he wanted back in. I figured no true man quits that way so I did not vote for him. I stuck it out with Bush 41. And watched Perot cause Bush 41 to lose and hand us Bill Clinton.

What good did it do to not get Perot but to wind up with Clinton?

[fj1200]

One must have some standards........... ;)

I do recall Perot being rather short.

[fj1200]

What good did it do to not get Perot but to wind up with Clinton?

1994.

[aboutime]

One reason to vote for Romney is to stick to Obama's base after the BOO a nine year girl for saying Mitt should win the election

Libs are so classy folks


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/msnbc-crowd-boos-9-year-old-girl-for-supporting-romney/#ooid=twb2diNjru7M5Ksza0-otad3E4AIHGlO



red states rule. I'm actually rather pleased that Americans...all three of them who watch PMSNBC, got to hear supposed Adult, Minor children who identify as Liberal, Democrats...BOO a nine year old.

Probably the first time many of them ever Booed someone with more Intelligence, and more grown up than they were Combined.

[Robert A Whit]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Robert A Whithttp://www.debatepolicy.com/images/debate_policy/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?p=587018#post587018)Why did you bother to vote? Remember when people such as you cast a vote for Ross Perot? Did that help them at all?





Wait ---- is voting supposed to be about "helping people," like giving out lots of extra food stamps or making war on benighted Afghans to "help" them?

I voted for Perot, but it never occurred to me to suppose it was about helping people. I just thought he'd be the best president. Well, admittedly, after Perot quit the race once, my faith in him got a little tarnished, but I did it anyway.

I don't think the theory of democracy has anything to do with "helping" people with one's vote.

Yes. You voted to help Perot.
It is my mission to try to mentor posters as to what it takes to make a good president. As I stated, I looked hard at Perot out of some annoyance with Bush 41 and of course I did not want Clinton to win. Apparently you did not mind Clinton winning. Were I Clinton, I would have sent people like you a thank you card.

Perot understood business and too often Democrats don't like business so they trash experts in business. I jumped off the Perot bandwagon when he quit. I don't back quitters.

This country is not exactly a democracy since the public plays no part in how the Feds govern. Voting each 4 years for a new guy is a crude way to govern. Sort of like the ships captain sails for Hawaii but heads to Alaska and 4 years later voters want a new captain.

Obama is going the wrong way. Clinton had lots more experience than Obama but as we know now, the man was too much interested in the ladies, including other mens wives but thankfully republicans were on hand to force him to steer the proper course.

[Robert A Whit]

1994.

Clinton's lemmings were true believers. And I doubt they changed their minds allowing 1994 to happen. Are you claiming 1994 was a sign of Clinton fatigue that early?

[mundame]

I do recall Perot being rather short.


True...............

But his ears were so big that made up for it.

[mundame]

It is my mission to try to mentor posters as to what it takes to make a good president. As I stated, I looked hard at Perot out of some annoyance with Bush 41 and of course I did not want Clinton to win. Apparently you did not mind Clinton winning. Were I Clinton, I would have sent people like you a thank you card.




Thank God somebody is mentoring us! We just wouldn't know what to do otherwise.

Well, darn, I wish you had been Clinton!! 1) You'd have sent me a thank you card, and 2) you probably don't like fat chicks named Monica.

[Robert A Whit]

True...............

But his ears were so big that made up for it.

One advantage to the ears of Obama is that he does not need ear muffs in cold weather.

[Robert A Whit]

Thank God somebody is mentoring us! We just wouldn't know what to do otherwise.

Well, darn, I wish you had been Clinton!! 1) You'd have sent me a thank you card, and 2) you probably don't like fat chicks named Monica.

Clinton was religious. He liked Monica for her works.

[red states rule]

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/sk102412dAPR20121023074533.jpg

[fj1200]

Clinton's lemmings were true believers. And I doubt they changed their minds allowing 1994 to happen. Are you claiming 1994 was a sign of Clinton fatigue that early?

It certainly was a rebuttal to his agenda. And no Clinton voters needed to change their mind; he only got 43?% of the vote.

[aboutime]

Clinton was religious. He liked Monica for her works.



We all know. Bill Clinton fathered Monica's Immaculate MissConception....and Obama was born.