red states rule
10-15-2012, 03:38 AM
Why the hell is Bill out there campaigning for Obama, while Obama's team is tossing Hillary uder the bus?
I know Bill is a jerk when it comes to being husband but standing one the sidelines while the Obama team using Hillary as the fall guy for Obama's incompetence is amazing
As Eliana Johnson points out over at NRO, this morning, David Axelrod continued to throw Hillary Clinton and the State Department under the bus (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/330358/axelrod-throws-state-department-under-benghazi-bus-eliana-johnson), doubling down on the story that Joe Biden's royal "we" at the veep debate referred only to a party of two -- himself and the President -- not knowing about the requests for enhanced security In Libya. Apparently, in the Obama presidency, the buck doesn't stop with the President . . . it stops with, in Axelrod's words, "the security folks at the State Department."
What Biden and Axelrod are essentially saying is that Hillary Clinton is thoroughly to blame for this debacle. If she somehow knew about the requests but denied them (and then failed to communicate that fact to the higest levels after the attacks), she's been guilty of a serious breach of judgment. It's really a firing offense (not that President Obama can do that for political reasons (http://www.debatepolicy.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/10/rev_up_the_bus__someones_going_under_it) . . .) If, on the other hand, those requests were being denied and she didn't even know about them, then she's manifestly incompetent --- also a firing offense.
I've never been a big fan of Hillary Clinton's, but I can hardly believe she'd make the mistake of not doing proper CYA on a matter of this magnitude, especially when thoughts of 2016 lurk in her (and certainly her husband's) brain. It seems to me more likely that the Obama White House generally is just trying to insulate itself from blame by letting all the garbage run downhill into the Secretary of State's office. And in addition, Joe Biden would probably looove to dispatch a potential rival for 2016, since he apparently harbors presidential ambitions (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/matthews-panel-looks-to-2016-biden-seriously-considering-running-for-president/) (case closed: that means he's absolutely delusional (http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2012/08/20/joe-bidens-gaffes-call-for-a-thorough-neurological-examination/), especially after that bizarre debate outing last week).
Ed Klein is reporting that Bill Clinton doesn't like this turn of events one bit (http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/12/author-ed-klein-as-benghazi-blame-nears-hillary-clintons-grow-furious/). As I predicted here (http://www.debatepolicy.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/09/24/clintonobama_relations_are_about_to_get_interestin g), the whole Clinton-Obama dynamic is becoming more fascinating by the day. Indeed, "rev the bus -- someone's going under it (http://www.debatepolicy.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/10/rev_up_the_bus__someones_going_under_it)" . . . but the Clinton are no doubt determined that Hillary isn't going to be the one to take the fall for this.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/14/that_bus_is_rolling
I know Bill is a jerk when it comes to being husband but standing one the sidelines while the Obama team using Hillary as the fall guy for Obama's incompetence is amazing
As Eliana Johnson points out over at NRO, this morning, David Axelrod continued to throw Hillary Clinton and the State Department under the bus (http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/330358/axelrod-throws-state-department-under-benghazi-bus-eliana-johnson), doubling down on the story that Joe Biden's royal "we" at the veep debate referred only to a party of two -- himself and the President -- not knowing about the requests for enhanced security In Libya. Apparently, in the Obama presidency, the buck doesn't stop with the President . . . it stops with, in Axelrod's words, "the security folks at the State Department."
What Biden and Axelrod are essentially saying is that Hillary Clinton is thoroughly to blame for this debacle. If she somehow knew about the requests but denied them (and then failed to communicate that fact to the higest levels after the attacks), she's been guilty of a serious breach of judgment. It's really a firing offense (not that President Obama can do that for political reasons (http://www.debatepolicy.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/10/rev_up_the_bus__someones_going_under_it) . . .) If, on the other hand, those requests were being denied and she didn't even know about them, then she's manifestly incompetent --- also a firing offense.
I've never been a big fan of Hillary Clinton's, but I can hardly believe she'd make the mistake of not doing proper CYA on a matter of this magnitude, especially when thoughts of 2016 lurk in her (and certainly her husband's) brain. It seems to me more likely that the Obama White House generally is just trying to insulate itself from blame by letting all the garbage run downhill into the Secretary of State's office. And in addition, Joe Biden would probably looove to dispatch a potential rival for 2016, since he apparently harbors presidential ambitions (http://www.mediaite.com/tv/matthews-panel-looks-to-2016-biden-seriously-considering-running-for-president/) (case closed: that means he's absolutely delusional (http://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2012/08/20/joe-bidens-gaffes-call-for-a-thorough-neurological-examination/), especially after that bizarre debate outing last week).
Ed Klein is reporting that Bill Clinton doesn't like this turn of events one bit (http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/12/author-ed-klein-as-benghazi-blame-nears-hillary-clintons-grow-furious/). As I predicted here (http://www.debatepolicy.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/09/24/clintonobama_relations_are_about_to_get_interestin g), the whole Clinton-Obama dynamic is becoming more fascinating by the day. Indeed, "rev the bus -- someone's going under it (http://www.debatepolicy.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/10/rev_up_the_bus__someones_going_under_it)" . . . but the Clinton are no doubt determined that Hillary isn't going to be the one to take the fall for this.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/carolplattliebau/2012/10/14/that_bus_is_rolling