Advise for Mitt Romney

[Robert A Whit]

I advise Mitt Romney to review the 1984 Reagan vs Mondale Debate.
Mondale attacked deficits. Though Reagan did not defend deficits, he pointed out that Mondale had also supported deficits.
Mondale did the bit about the rich. We know that Obama plans to do it. Reagan was awesome in blowing down that concept.

I want to ask you guys.

Why is it that when the rich go to a movie, buy a loaf of bread and rent buildings they pay the same price as the poor.

What is the theory of government that gets democrats yapping that the rich must pay more for this one product, government?

What about government means the rich should be the vast supporters?

Can somebody show me in the constitution where it states the rich have a much larger debt to government?

[Robert A Whit]

I advise Mitt Romney to review the 1984 Reagan vs Mondale Debate.
Mondale attacked deficits. Though Reagan did not defend deficits, he pointed out that Mondale had also supported deficits.
Mondale did the bit about the rich. We know that Obama plans to do it. Reagan was awesome in blowing down that concept.

I want to ask you guys.

Why is it that when the rich go to a movie, buy a loaf of bread and rent buildings they pay the same price as the poor.

What is the theory of government that gets democrats yapping that the rich must pay more for this one product, government?

What about government means the rich should be the vast supporters?

Can somebody show me in the constitution where it states the rich have a much larger debt to government?

I forgot to mention that you can find that Mondale vs Reagan debate on CSPAN.

Mitt should study Reagan and how he handled things and try harder to get a lot more support.

Some explain his lack of support.

I call it the dirty tactics of democrats.

So, how can Mitt counter those dirty tricks?

Reagan was great at fending off attacks. Mitt needs to study their tactics and hammer them.

[glockmail]

First I'd advise him to know the difference between "advice" and "advise". :coffee:

[Kathianne]

I forgot to mention that you can find that Mondale vs Reagan debate on CSPAN.

Mitt should study Reagan and how he handled things and try harder to get a lot more support.

Some explain his lack of support.

I call it the dirty tactics of democrats.

So, how can Mitt counter those dirty tricks?

Reagan was great at fending off attacks. Mitt needs to study their tactics and hammer them.

I hear what you are saying. One problem this cycle is the media, it wasn't as full blown in the tank back in the 70's and 80's for one party. No matter what Mitt says, the media will hit him with the power they have left. Again, not as strong as in the 70's and 80's. They've lost credibility nearly to the point of Congress, which is dangerous.

My take, Romney will get 'did you stop beating your wife, finally?' type of questions. He needs to ignore the question and bring up the points of Obama's record that need to be addressed. Obama will be given softballs, Romney's responses need to be to bring up Obama's record and the faults therein.

In other words, the best use of the time for Romney is to bring up the economy and the dangerous signs that have been reported in the past few weeks. The lies of Obama, from economy, Shovel ready, Solyndra, and most recently the lies of Embassy attack and killing of Americans. An 'act of war,' not a 'bump in the road.'

No terror attacks since his election? Ft. Hood?

[Robert A Whit]

I hear what you are saying. One problem this cycle is the media, it wasn't as full blown in the tank back in the 70's and 80's for one party. No matter what Mitt says, the media will hit him with the power they have left. Again, not as strong as in the 70's and 80's. They've lost credibility nearly to the point of Congress, which is dangerous.

My take, Romney will get 'did you stop beating your wife, finally?' type of questions. He needs to ignore the question and bring up the points of Obama's record that need to be addressed. Obama will be given softballs, Romney's responses need to be to bring up Obama's record and the faults therein.

In other words, the best use of the time for Romney is to bring up the economy and the dangerous signs that have been reported in the past few weeks. The lies of Obama, from economy, Shovel ready, Solyndra, and most recently the lies of Embassy attack and killing of Americans. An 'act of war,' not a 'bump in the road.'

No terror attacks since his election? Ft. Hood?

Excellent points. I am sure that Obama will call Obama Care ... Romney Care. I think that what bugs people about voting for him is they fear his pro government solution past.

Hey, I am reading a very good book. LOL as if any of you care.

This book deals with the economics of Keyes vs Hayek. Author is Nicholas Wapshott and the title is Keynes / Hayek, the clash that defined modern economics.

I find this sort of reading valuable. You not only learn something about economics, but history. For instance I did not realize Keynes negotiated some of the Treaty of Versaille yet he argumed against making Germany a pauper state. He warned it had serious consequences. Wapshott also claims that at no time was Keynes even leaning socialist. Hayek had leaned that way but he shot way over to the free market side.

Romney needs to do more defining his purposes and his ways to suceed. He ought to remind the TV audience that Obama won hoping and a changing. Remember that tune? I forget who she was but a woman singer sang a song in the 50s or 60s where some of the words are Hoping, wishing and a changing ... I think they are. I plan to try to you tube them. See what I can find.

Yeah, song by Dusty Springfield. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycbgHM1mI0k

[gabosaurus]

Mitt Romney is not Ronald Reagan. He is barely Walter Mondale. :cool:

[Robert A Whit]

Mitt Romney is not Ronald Reagan. He is barely Walter Mondale. :cool:

Democrats flat despise Ronald Reagan and would not say nice things about the man if a gun was put to their temple.

Anyone wanting to praise Reagan will get an earfull from Democrats about how lousy he was.

Was RR lousy or great.

I maintain that based on all presidents actions impacting on this country and the world, Ronald Reagan is the best of all presidents.

Washijngto was fighting for about a third of the then population. Historians of note and sound reputation will admit that of the citizens then living, 1/3 wanted to stay with England. 1/3 did not give a darned. It was a mere well to do minority that fought off England.

We can scratch off Thomas Jefferson and even Washington as slave owners. How could they promote freedom when they owned slaves? Of all our presidents, little ever mentioned is that about 16 of our presidents owned slaves or their family members owned slaves.

A paradox of sorts is how can a nation call itself pro freedom but support slavery?

When Abe came along, what is he called great over? Was it over foreign affairs?

Domestically he plunged this nation into its most bloody war ever. We had more killed under his leadership than during all the rest of the wars.

Reagan on the other hand cured a lot of domestic problems. And he turned over the keys to freedom for millions of humans all over this world.

Reagan is the greatest and some day when we get more conservative historians, such as Di Lorenzo up to bat, he will be rated number 1 all time best American presidents.

This of course will cause Democrats to go wild and froth at the mouth and gnash their teeth.

I predict it.
Abe is king of getting most Americans killed off.

[aboutime]

Mitt Romney is not Ronald Reagan. He is barely Walter Mondale. :cool:


gabby is not a human with a brain. gabby is barely able to THINK without pretending to be Obama-like with Lies.