Kathianne
08-17-2012, 04:57 AM
Well according to Ezra Klein:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-15/obama-s-evolution-on-paul-ryan-and-his-budget.html
How Obama Created the Greatest Threat to His Presidency
<cite class="byline">By Ezra Klein (http://www.bloomberg.com/view/bios/ezra-klein/) </cite> <cite class="byline story_time"> Aug 15, 2012 5:30 PM CT
</cite>Here’s the weird thing about Paul Ryan (http://topics.bloomberg.com/paul-ryan/) being named to the Republican presidential ticket: It’s all part of Barack Obama (http://topics.bloomberg.com/barack-obama/)’s campaign plan -- a plan that’s working better than his strategists could have hoped. It could also backfire more disastrously than they have ever imagined...
As Mitt Romney (http://topics.bloomberg.com/mitt-romney/) emerged as the all-but-certain Republican presidential nominee, the Obama administration began calling Ryan’s budget the “Romney-Ryan budget.” Priorities USA, the Obama-affiliated super-PAC, dedicated its first ad to tying Romney to Ryan. “Mitt Romney says he’s on the same page as Paul Ryan, who wrote the plan to essentially end Medicare,” the ad’s narrator warned.
Unexpected ResultThe Obama team never could have predicted that its efforts would help vault Ryan into the nomination for vice president. But Ryan is a remarkably talented politician -- so good, in fact, that he managed to convince Romney and the Republican Party that the argument the Obama administration pursued so aggressively is actually an argument that Republicans will win.
The result, to paraphrase (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/hlmencke163179.html) H.L. Mencken, is that the Obama administration knew the fight they wanted, and now they’re going to get it good and hard.
Putting the Ryan budget at the center of the 2012 election has the tactical benefit of forcing Republicans to defend an unpopular proposal; more important, it has the long-term strategic benefit of potentially discrediting the Ryan budget as a political document. Prior to Ryan joining the ticket, a Romney loss seemed likely to strengthen the Republican Party’s conservative wing, because the defeat would be blamed on Romney’s moderate past. Now, if the Romney-Ryan ticket loses, it will vindicate skeptics of the party’s rightward shift, potentially strengthening the party’s moderates. That could produce a more cooperative opposition for Obama to work with in a second term.
But if Obama loses, Republicans will have won the presidency with a mandate to enact a deeply conservative agenda. Left to his own devices, Romney might have been a relatively pragmatic and cautious president. Instead, the Obama administration’s three-year effort to enshrine the Ryan budget at the heart of the Republican Party would prove to have been a crucial push toward enacting that budget into law.
<cite class="byline story_time">
</cite>
Even if he loses, in Klein's world, Obama is still in control. Think he knows more than the polls?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-15/obama-s-evolution-on-paul-ryan-and-his-budget.html
How Obama Created the Greatest Threat to His Presidency
<cite class="byline">By Ezra Klein (http://www.bloomberg.com/view/bios/ezra-klein/) </cite> <cite class="byline story_time"> Aug 15, 2012 5:30 PM CT
</cite>Here’s the weird thing about Paul Ryan (http://topics.bloomberg.com/paul-ryan/) being named to the Republican presidential ticket: It’s all part of Barack Obama (http://topics.bloomberg.com/barack-obama/)’s campaign plan -- a plan that’s working better than his strategists could have hoped. It could also backfire more disastrously than they have ever imagined...
As Mitt Romney (http://topics.bloomberg.com/mitt-romney/) emerged as the all-but-certain Republican presidential nominee, the Obama administration began calling Ryan’s budget the “Romney-Ryan budget.” Priorities USA, the Obama-affiliated super-PAC, dedicated its first ad to tying Romney to Ryan. “Mitt Romney says he’s on the same page as Paul Ryan, who wrote the plan to essentially end Medicare,” the ad’s narrator warned.
Unexpected ResultThe Obama team never could have predicted that its efforts would help vault Ryan into the nomination for vice president. But Ryan is a remarkably talented politician -- so good, in fact, that he managed to convince Romney and the Republican Party that the argument the Obama administration pursued so aggressively is actually an argument that Republicans will win.
The result, to paraphrase (http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/hlmencke163179.html) H.L. Mencken, is that the Obama administration knew the fight they wanted, and now they’re going to get it good and hard.
Putting the Ryan budget at the center of the 2012 election has the tactical benefit of forcing Republicans to defend an unpopular proposal; more important, it has the long-term strategic benefit of potentially discrediting the Ryan budget as a political document. Prior to Ryan joining the ticket, a Romney loss seemed likely to strengthen the Republican Party’s conservative wing, because the defeat would be blamed on Romney’s moderate past. Now, if the Romney-Ryan ticket loses, it will vindicate skeptics of the party’s rightward shift, potentially strengthening the party’s moderates. That could produce a more cooperative opposition for Obama to work with in a second term.
But if Obama loses, Republicans will have won the presidency with a mandate to enact a deeply conservative agenda. Left to his own devices, Romney might have been a relatively pragmatic and cautious president. Instead, the Obama administration’s three-year effort to enshrine the Ryan budget at the heart of the Republican Party would prove to have been a crucial push toward enacting that budget into law.
<cite class="byline story_time">
</cite>
Even if he loses, in Klein's world, Obama is still in control. Think he knows more than the polls?