Little-Acorn
07-30-2012, 04:17 PM
Another of Washington's worst-kept secrets is outed: Yes, Obama's political appointees DID interfere with the prosecution of the New Black Panthers who were videotaped swinging clubs and intimidating voters during the 2008 election. Will this open the Obamanites up to charges of Obstruction of Justice, along with all their other crimes?
Is it November yet?
--------------------------------------------------
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/07/30/obstruction_of_justice_dc_judge_rules_obamas_polit ical_appointees_interfered_with_new_black_panther_ case
Obstruction of Justice: DC Judge Rules Obama's Political Appointees Interfered With New Black Panther Case
by Katie Pavlich
Jul 30, 2012 03:55 PM EST
Today a Federal DC Judge confirmed that President Obama's political appointees in the Department of Justice did in fact interfere with the prosecution of two New Black Panther party members after they were filmed outside of a Philadelphia polling place in 2008 wielding a billy club and intimidating voters. This is something the Justice Department has denied up to this point. More from the Washington Examiner:
The ruling came as part of a motion by the conservative legal watch dog group Judicial Watch, who had sued the DOJ in federal court to enforce a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to the the New Black Panthers case. Judicial Watch had secured many previously unavailable documents through their suit against DOJ and were now suing for attorneys’ fees.
From the judge: The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
Is it November yet?
--------------------------------------------------
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/07/30/obstruction_of_justice_dc_judge_rules_obamas_polit ical_appointees_interfered_with_new_black_panther_ case
Obstruction of Justice: DC Judge Rules Obama's Political Appointees Interfered With New Black Panther Case
by Katie Pavlich
Jul 30, 2012 03:55 PM EST
Today a Federal DC Judge confirmed that President Obama's political appointees in the Department of Justice did in fact interfere with the prosecution of two New Black Panther party members after they were filmed outside of a Philadelphia polling place in 2008 wielding a billy club and intimidating voters. This is something the Justice Department has denied up to this point. More from the Washington Examiner:
The ruling came as part of a motion by the conservative legal watch dog group Judicial Watch, who had sued the DOJ in federal court to enforce a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to the the New Black Panthers case. Judicial Watch had secured many previously unavailable documents through their suit against DOJ and were now suing for attorneys’ fees.
From the judge: The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.