Nice summary on Spooky Dude Soros

[SassyLady]

The 5 step process that George Soros has used to collapse other countries and is using against America.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlXhkhU0ix0&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlXhkhU0ix0&feature=related)

[fj1200]

Dammit with the videos, :poke: can't someone just summarize?

[Gator Monroe]

It's Sad when non-practising Jews have such hatred for Zionists & Israel ...

[SassyLady]

Dammit with the videos, :poke: can't someone just summarize?

Well, if I told you that his first step is to set up a Shadow Government (which he's done), would you know what that is? Probably not and then you would ask me to explain it, which I could never do as well as the expert in the video.

Another step is to gain control of media sources....or at least intimidate them .... guess who is behind the advertising boycott of Rush?

Anyway, videos are for those who care about making their own decisions by listening and discerning for themselves and not relying on a fellow poster's perspective.

[SassyLady]

Gaining control of the media is one step in Soros' plan. Here's a response from Limbaugh's camp regarding Spooky Dude's guy, Brock's (head of Media Matters) attempt to control the media.



'Rush Limbaugh Show' responds to Brock






<iframe name="iframe_odiogo_0" id="iframe_odiogo_0" src="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74307.html" width="290" height="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: transparent; "></iframe>
David Brock is so outraged at Rush Limbaugh’s words of three weeks ago that he started organizing a protest — almost 3 years ago.
It was planned ahead and activated at the first moment Brock could manipulate a media frenzy. Make no mistake, Brock’s “marketplace of ideas” offers only one brand: Brand Brock. All others will be forced off the shelves with intimidation and lies.
Continue Readin (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74307.html#continue)Media Matters for America stands for censorship, and nothing more than that. Their ginned-up election year anger is directed at the words of their media political opposition — similar expressions are ignored when used by their allies.
It’s different, they claim. It’s always different when they say it is, for an array of implausible reasons. The truth is that they are hypocrites. But that’s the least of their offenses.
By putting small business in the crosshairs of their war on expression, Media Matters is causing real harm. They are hurting these businesses, their employees and their families. As a business owner, imagine waking up one morning and being assaulted by hundreds of coordinated attacks from operatives who never were or will be your customers.
These Media Matters mobs bear a simple message: Renounce our enemies or become one of them. They distribute target lists of advertiser phone numbers, email addresses, Facebook links and Twitter handles, and then they come out of nowhere, en masse, against selected advertisers in rotation. They barrage small business with threats until they cancel their advertising.
Customers either can’t get through the fog of messages, or see a business under attack. Everyone is so busy with the protestors that no one is left to talk to customers. You call that education, David? Reasonable people identify what you organize by a different name.
If businesses give in to these demands, they lose access to the customers who helped build their company. Let’s be clear — most advertisers aren’t making a political statement when they decide where to spend their money. Most chose varied programs to reach audiences with different points of view. When they buy talk radio advertising in general, or “The Rush Limbaugh Show” in particular, they are reaching an audience, as well as creating jobs and supporting families. That’s all they want.
But Media Matters says you can’t talk to that audience anymore. And when these businesses shrink, because they’ve lost access to half their customers; when they lay off employees or even shut down, whom will Media Matters blame? Probably not themselves.
This is Brock’s cynical marketplace of ideas. He will fail, as every censoring thug has in this country. Americans are smart enough to make our own decisions about what media to consume. We don’t need self-appointed monitors. Black-list censors are some of the most reviled characters in U.S. history.




Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/74307.html#ixzz1po3to7zJ

[fj1200]

Well, if I told you...

Anyway, videos are for those who care about making their own decisions by listening and discerning for themselves and not relying on a fellow poster's perspective.

A listing of the steps would have been a start and then we could see how he used it in other countries and then his supposed plans here. Also, I was wondering if Jim Rogers was also setting up a shadow government as he too "broke the bank."

[SassyLady]

A listing of the steps would have been a start and then we could see how he used it in other countries and then his supposed plans here. Also, I was wondering if Jim Rogers was also setting up a shadow government as he too "broke the bank."

The video is of the five steps and goes into great detail about how it's been used in other countries and how they are already being put in place here.

If you think the only thing Soros has done is break the Bank of England, then you need to do some serious research. He has toppled governments and annihilated economies in order to rake in the billions of dollars.......he bets on the failures.

[fj1200]

^I know about Soros, he makes money by being smarter than central bankers who think that they are smarter than the markets. Unfortunately for us and fortunately for Soros that is pretty much the definition of a central banker.

[fj1200]

Steps here (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,602143,00.html) surrounded by much populist blither (was that redundant?) which unfortunately defines the deep-end where Beck seems to reside these days.



After country after country after country, we found that there are five steps to him gaining control. He does it over and over and over again. So, let's see what the steps are and let's if he's done any of them here.The first one is form a shadow government using humanitarian aid as cover. This is what he just said. It's kind of funny. It's kind of fun. The first step he said is subversive activities. OK?Step two: control the airwaves. Fund existing radio and TV outlets and take control over them or start your own outlets. Remember: take control of existing or start your own.Step three: destabilize the state, weaken the government and build an anti-government kind of feeling in this country. You exploit an economic crisis or take advantage of existing crisis — pressure from the top and the bottom. This will allow you to weaken the government and build anti- government public sentiment.Step four: you provoke an election crisis. You wait for an election. And during the election, you cry voter fraud.Step five: take power. You stage massive demonstrations, civil disobedience, sit-ins, general strike, you encourage activism. You promote voter fraud and tell followers what to do through your radio and television stations.

[SassyLady]

David Horowitz and Richard Poe wrote a book, Shadow Party that outlined the steps. Perhaps that is where Beck found them.

But here's more on Soros:


http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/king-george-soros-obamas-puppeteer-who-leads-shadow-party-within-the-united-states/



How many Americans have heard of the Shadow Party?

How many Americans truly know George Soros’ goals in destroying the United States?

How many people know that most of Obama’s millions during his campaign for Presidency actually were bundled into the “Shadow Party”?

A bit of history:

“The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat.”
George Soros
February 1997

“The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.”
George Soros
June 2006

“The separation of church and state, the bedrock of our democracy, is clearly undermined by having a born-again President.” George Soros
October 18, 2004

[fj1200]

Yes, he's a smart progressive with money. Hate those guys. And even worse he's one with an agenda but he doesn't have power to crash economies, the central bankers have already started that ball rolling.

[SassyLady]

Yes, he's a smart progressive with money. Hate those guys. And even worse he's one with an agenda but he doesn't have power to crash economies, the central bankers have already started that ball rolling.

And you are asserting he has nothing to do with the central bankers?

[SassyLady]

More spooky info. Perhaps this is the way Soros plans to control the military.




Ron Paul’s Soros Defense Plan

Posted by Daniel Greenfield (http://frontpagemag.com/author/daniel-greenfield/) Bio ↓ (http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/#bio) on Jan 2nd, 2012

It was recently observed that Ron Paul was to the left of Obama on national security and the best evidence for that statement can be found when one year ago Ron Paul joined forces with Barney Frank on a proposal to gut national defense via a panel of experts, quite a few of whom were tied to George Soros.In July 2010, Barney Frank and Ron Paul co-authored a Huffington Post article (http://sweetness-light.com/archive/frank-panel-wants-1t-in-defense-cuts)rolling out their Sustainable Defense Task Force (http://www.comw.org/pda/1006SDTF.html). The Task Force “consisting of experts on military expenditures that span the ideological spectrum” would recommend a trillion dollars in defense cuts. The experts, however, didn’t quite “span the ideological spectrum” — more like float under it.

The panel of experts who would decide how to best gut national defense featured such independent thinkers as William D. Hartung of the New America Foundation. Hartung’s main expertise was appearing in “Hijacking Catastrophe: 9/11, Fear & the Selling of American Empire.”
Then there was Lawrence J. Kolb of the Center for American Progress and Miriam Pemberton of the Institute for Policy Studies. If you want to know what the Center, the Foundation and the Institute all have in common, it’s Hungarian and smells like stale cabbage and the death of nations.
The rather creepy Institute for Policy Studies issued a paper proposing that Obama (http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=225829) act as king and rule through executive orders. The New American Foundation is not only backed by Soros but has his son on its leadership council. The Center for American Progress is run by the co-chair of Obama’s transition team and is, for all intents and purposes, the think tank of the White House. All three are Soros funded.
But it doesn’t end there. Also on the panel was Christopher Hellman of the National Priorities Project (NPP). If you are wondering what the NPP is, it’s a think tank whose objective is to “influence national spending priorities.” And if you’re in the mood for a double, Miriam Pemberton is also on the board of the NPP. The man behind the curtain at NPP? None other than our favorite Hungarian James Bond villain.
Going further down the list there’s Winslow Wheeler of the Center for Defense Information (CDI). The CDI’s goal is to strengthen “national and international security through international cooperation [and] reduced reliance on unilateral military power to resolve conflict.” CDI operates under the aegis of the World Security Institute, which is apparently the least creepy name they could think of. Wheeler is a Counterpunch contributor, a site which even Stalinists think goes a bit too far. CDI gets money from the Open Society Institute (OSI) where the stench of death and stale cabbage never goes away.
Then there’s Charles Knight and Carl Conetta of the Project for Defense Alternatives, which appears to be a subset of the Commonwealth Institute. Of its board of directors, S.M. Miller is also the founder of United for a Fair Economy which enjoys generous support from a certain philanthropic chap who occasionally destroys economies for sport. Another member, Guy Molyneux, has also worked with OSI. A third board member, Richard Healey, was formerly director of the Institute for Policy Studies and is on the advisory board of the Center for Social Inclusion, founded by two OSI veterans.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/

If you’re tired of reading through all this, then here’s the summary. Of the Paul-Frank Task Force, 9 out of 14 members were linked to Soros’s organs. Two were affiliated with the Cato Institute. One is indeterminate.

Ron Paul proposed to put a bunch of Soros-funded think tank experts in charge of dismantling the US military. Think about that for a moment. Ron Paul supporters can see conspiracies in a glass of water; can they see anything wrong with this picture? Can they see anything wrong with having a man from a group that was investigated for its Communist ties in the driver’s seat on national defense?
The task force’s proposals included cutting nuclear deterrence; reducing the fleet by 57 ships, including two carriers; canceling the Joint Strike Fighter; “severely curtail missile defense” — and that is a direct quote from the report — retiring four Marine battalions; reducing the military by 200,000 personnel; cutting defense research spending by 50 billion over ten years; and increasing health care fees for members of the military.

[fj1200]

-
And you are asserting he has nothing to do with the central bankers?

I'm asserting he's not a central banker. Do you have proof that he has colluded with central bankers to destroy their own economies?