johnwk
12-07-2011, 08:45 AM
I was very disappointed with Glenn Beck`s interview with Gingrich in that two extremely important questions were not asked of Gingrich.
The first is why he decided to help create the federal department of education? What Newt Gingrich did when voting to create Jimmy the-progressive Carter`s federal department of education was, to open the door for progressives to centralize a federal power over state public schools systems. The fact is, creating a centralized regulatory power over the education of a nation`s younger generation is a priority of every communist and dictatorial government, and is used to brainwash a nation`s younger generation.
Aside from that, Newt Gingrich, in voting to create a federal department of education, not only ignored our Constitution`s Tenth Amendment, and the retained powers of the State, but he defied the founder’s clear intentions regarding the limited power of Congress with respect to learning and useful arts! But don`t take my word for this, let one of our founding fathers explain this limitation to Mr. Gingrich and those interested:
``The framers of the Constitution guarded so much against a possibility of such partial preferences as might be given, if Congress had the right to grant them, that, even to encourage learning and useful arts, the granting of patents is the extent of their power. And surely nothing could be less dangerous to the sovereignty or interest of the individual States than the encouragement which might be given to ingenious inventors or promoters of valuable inventions in the arts and sciences. The encouragement which the General Government might give to the fine arts, to commerce, to manufactures, and agriculture, might, if judiciously applied, redound to the honor of Congress, and the splendor, magnificence, and real advantage of the United States; but the wise framers of our Constitution saw that, if Congress had the power of exerting what has been called a royal munificence for these purposes, Congress might, like many royal benefactors, misplace their munificence; might elevate sycophants, and be inattentive to men unfriendly to the views of Government; might reward the ingenuity of the citizens of one State, and neglect a much greater genius of another. A citizen of a powerful State it might be said, was attended to, whilst that of one of less weight in the Federal scale was totally neglected. It is not sufficient, to remove these objections, to say, as some gentlemen have said, that Congress in incapable of partiality or absurdities, and that they are as far from committing them as my colleagues or myself. I tell them the Constitution was formed on a supposition of human frailty, and to restrain abuses of mistaken powers.” SEE: Annals of Congress Feb 7th,1792 Rep Page (http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&fileName=003/llac003.db&recNum=194)
The second issue of great importance which Glenn Beck did not ask is why Newt Gingrich favored adopting the ``Fairness Doctrine`` which would allow the federal government to regulate speech on radio and television stations under the guise to ``afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.`` Of course, this power is another one which every communist country and dictatorship exercises.
The fact is, Gingrich has shown his support for our federal government to exercise this extraordinary power and allow the federal government to meddle in our media when our Constitution forbids Congress from abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble It should also be noted that Gingrich was in very questionable company with those who sponsored a return to the Fairness Doctrine: RINOs, snakes and a PUBLIC BATHROOM CLOWN (http://www.rollcall.com/news/-19763-1.html)!
For the co-sponsors see: Fairness in Broadcasting Act of 1987 (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d100:HR01934:@@@P:..)
COSPONSORS(71), ALPHABETICAL
Rep Akaka, Daniel K. [HI-2] - 5/7/1987 Rep Bliley, Tom [VA-3] - 4/2/1987 Rep Bonior, David E. [MI-12] - 4/2/1987 Rep Boucher, Rick [VA-9] - 4/2/1987 Rep Boxer, Barbara [CA-6] - 4/2/1987Rep Brooks, Jack B. [TX-9] - 4/2/1987 Rep Bryant, John W. [TX-5] - 4/2/1987 Rep Buechner, Jack [MO-2] - 5/7/1987Rep Bustamante, Albert G. [TX-23] - 5/7/1987Rep Callahan, Sonny [AL-1] - 5/7/1987Rep Coelho, Anthony Lee [CA-15] - 4/2/1987Rep Coleman, E. Thomas [MO-6] - 5/7/1987Rep Collins, Cardiss - 4/2/1987 Rep Conte, Silvio O. [MA-1] - 5/27/1987Rep Cooper, Jim [TN-4] - 5/7/1987Rep Craig, Larry E.[ID-1] - 4/2/1987Rep Crane, Philip M. [IL-12] - 5/27/1987Rep Dannemeyer, William E. [CA-39] - 4/2/1987Rep Daub, Hal [NE-2] - 5/7/1987Rep de Lugo, Ron [VI] - 5/27/1987Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] - 5/7/1987Rep Dellums, Ronald V. [CA-8] - 4/2/1987 Rep Dixon, Julian C. [CA-28] - 4/2/1987Rep Dornan, Robert K. [CA-38] - 4/2/1987Rep Dyson, Roy [MD-1] - 5/7/1987 Rep Eckart, Dennis E. [OH-11] - 4/2/1987Rep Fascell, Dante B. [FL-19] - 4/2/1987Rep Fields, Jack [TX-8] - 4/2/1987Rep Ford, William D. [MI-15] - 4/2/1987Rep Gingrich, Newt [GA-6] - 4/2/1987Rep Gray, William H., III [PA-2] - 4/2/1987Rep Hayes, Charles A. [IL-1] - 5/7/1987Rep Hochbrueckner, George J. [NY-1] - 5/7/1987Rep Hughes, William J. [NJ-2] - 5/7/1987Rep Hyde, Henry J. [IL-6] - 4/2/1987Rep Lagomarsino, Robert J. [CA-19] - 4/2/1987Rep Leach, James A. [IA-1] - 4/2/1987Rep Leland, Mickey [TX-18] - 4/2/1987Rep Levine, Mel [CA-27] - 5/7/1987Rep Lipinski, William O. [IL-5] - 5/7/1987Rep Lott, Trent [MS-5] - 4/2/1987Rep Madigan, Edward R. [IL-15] - 5/7/1987Rep Markey, Edward J. [MA-7] - 4/2/1987Rep Marlenee, Ron [MT-2] - 4/2/1987Rep Martinez, Matthew G. [CA-30] - 5/7/1987Rep Murtha, John P. [PA-12] - 4/2/1987Rep Nielson, Howard C. - 4/2/1987Rep Oberstar, James L. [MN-8] - 4/2/1987Rep Owens, Major R. [NY-12] - 5/7/1987Rep Pepper, Claude [FL-18] - 4/2/1987 [u]Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-16] - 4/2/1987Rep Scheuer, James H. [NY-8] - 5/7/1987Rep Schroeder, Patricia [CO-1] - 4/2/1987Rep Schuette, Bill [MI-10] - 5/7/1987Rep Schumer, Charles E. [NY-10] - 4/2/1987Rep Solarz, Stephen J. [NY-13] - 5/7/1987 Rep Stenholm, Charles W. [TX-17] - 4/2/1987Rep Stokes, Louis [OH-21] - 4/2/1987Rep Sundquist, Don [TN-7] - 5/7/1987 Rep Synar, Mike [OK-2] - 5/7/1987 Rep Torres, Estaban Edward [CA-34] - 5/7/1987 Rep Udall, Morris K. [AZ-2] - 4/2/1987Rep Vento, Bruce F. [MN-4] - 5/7/1987Rep Walgren, Doug [PA-18] - 4/2/1987 Rep Waxman, Henry A. [CA-24] - 4/2/1987Rep Weber, Vin [MN-2] - 4/2/1987 Rep Weiss, Ted [NY-17] - 5/7/1987 Rep Wise, Robert E., Jr. [WV-3] - 5/7/1987Rep Wolpe, Howard E. [MI-3] - 5/7/1987 Rep Wyden, Ron [OR-3] - 4/2/1987Rep Yates, Sidney R. [IL-9] - 4/2/1987
In regard to the background concerning this issue, early in 1987 the FCC repealed the Fairness Doctrine of 1949. Then, Congress attempted to bring it back and a bill passed both Houses and President Reagan vetoed it and Congress was unable to gain enough votes [H.R. 1934, which Gingrich sponsored] to override the veto. The controversy was that part of the bill having the federal government providing `[I]` a reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.``
See: Reagan's Veto Kills Fairness Doctrine Bill (http://articles.latimes.com/1987-06-21/news/mn-8908_1_fairness-doctrine) ``June 21, 1987|PENNY PAGANO | Times Staff Writer WASHINGTON — President Reagan, intensifying the debate over whether the nation's broadcasters must present opposing views of controversial issues, has vetoed legislation to turn into law the 38-year-old ``fairness doctrine,`` the White House announced Saturday. The doctrine, instituted by the Federal Communications Commission as public policy in 1949, requires the nation`s radio and television stations to ``afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.```
I can`t believe Glenn Beck did not raise these two vital issues with Gingrich.
JWK
The first is why he decided to help create the federal department of education? What Newt Gingrich did when voting to create Jimmy the-progressive Carter`s federal department of education was, to open the door for progressives to centralize a federal power over state public schools systems. The fact is, creating a centralized regulatory power over the education of a nation`s younger generation is a priority of every communist and dictatorial government, and is used to brainwash a nation`s younger generation.
Aside from that, Newt Gingrich, in voting to create a federal department of education, not only ignored our Constitution`s Tenth Amendment, and the retained powers of the State, but he defied the founder’s clear intentions regarding the limited power of Congress with respect to learning and useful arts! But don`t take my word for this, let one of our founding fathers explain this limitation to Mr. Gingrich and those interested:
``The framers of the Constitution guarded so much against a possibility of such partial preferences as might be given, if Congress had the right to grant them, that, even to encourage learning and useful arts, the granting of patents is the extent of their power. And surely nothing could be less dangerous to the sovereignty or interest of the individual States than the encouragement which might be given to ingenious inventors or promoters of valuable inventions in the arts and sciences. The encouragement which the General Government might give to the fine arts, to commerce, to manufactures, and agriculture, might, if judiciously applied, redound to the honor of Congress, and the splendor, magnificence, and real advantage of the United States; but the wise framers of our Constitution saw that, if Congress had the power of exerting what has been called a royal munificence for these purposes, Congress might, like many royal benefactors, misplace their munificence; might elevate sycophants, and be inattentive to men unfriendly to the views of Government; might reward the ingenuity of the citizens of one State, and neglect a much greater genius of another. A citizen of a powerful State it might be said, was attended to, whilst that of one of less weight in the Federal scale was totally neglected. It is not sufficient, to remove these objections, to say, as some gentlemen have said, that Congress in incapable of partiality or absurdities, and that they are as far from committing them as my colleagues or myself. I tell them the Constitution was formed on a supposition of human frailty, and to restrain abuses of mistaken powers.” SEE: Annals of Congress Feb 7th,1792 Rep Page (http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&fileName=003/llac003.db&recNum=194)
The second issue of great importance which Glenn Beck did not ask is why Newt Gingrich favored adopting the ``Fairness Doctrine`` which would allow the federal government to regulate speech on radio and television stations under the guise to ``afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.`` Of course, this power is another one which every communist country and dictatorship exercises.
The fact is, Gingrich has shown his support for our federal government to exercise this extraordinary power and allow the federal government to meddle in our media when our Constitution forbids Congress from abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble It should also be noted that Gingrich was in very questionable company with those who sponsored a return to the Fairness Doctrine: RINOs, snakes and a PUBLIC BATHROOM CLOWN (http://www.rollcall.com/news/-19763-1.html)!
For the co-sponsors see: Fairness in Broadcasting Act of 1987 (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d100:HR01934:@@@P:..)
COSPONSORS(71), ALPHABETICAL
Rep Akaka, Daniel K. [HI-2] - 5/7/1987 Rep Bliley, Tom [VA-3] - 4/2/1987 Rep Bonior, David E. [MI-12] - 4/2/1987 Rep Boucher, Rick [VA-9] - 4/2/1987 Rep Boxer, Barbara [CA-6] - 4/2/1987Rep Brooks, Jack B. [TX-9] - 4/2/1987 Rep Bryant, John W. [TX-5] - 4/2/1987 Rep Buechner, Jack [MO-2] - 5/7/1987Rep Bustamante, Albert G. [TX-23] - 5/7/1987Rep Callahan, Sonny [AL-1] - 5/7/1987Rep Coelho, Anthony Lee [CA-15] - 4/2/1987Rep Coleman, E. Thomas [MO-6] - 5/7/1987Rep Collins, Cardiss - 4/2/1987 Rep Conte, Silvio O. [MA-1] - 5/27/1987Rep Cooper, Jim [TN-4] - 5/7/1987Rep Craig, Larry E.[ID-1] - 4/2/1987Rep Crane, Philip M. [IL-12] - 5/27/1987Rep Dannemeyer, William E. [CA-39] - 4/2/1987Rep Daub, Hal [NE-2] - 5/7/1987Rep de Lugo, Ron [VI] - 5/27/1987Rep DeFazio, Peter A. [OR-4] - 5/7/1987Rep Dellums, Ronald V. [CA-8] - 4/2/1987 Rep Dixon, Julian C. [CA-28] - 4/2/1987Rep Dornan, Robert K. [CA-38] - 4/2/1987Rep Dyson, Roy [MD-1] - 5/7/1987 Rep Eckart, Dennis E. [OH-11] - 4/2/1987Rep Fascell, Dante B. [FL-19] - 4/2/1987Rep Fields, Jack [TX-8] - 4/2/1987Rep Ford, William D. [MI-15] - 4/2/1987Rep Gingrich, Newt [GA-6] - 4/2/1987Rep Gray, William H., III [PA-2] - 4/2/1987Rep Hayes, Charles A. [IL-1] - 5/7/1987Rep Hochbrueckner, George J. [NY-1] - 5/7/1987Rep Hughes, William J. [NJ-2] - 5/7/1987Rep Hyde, Henry J. [IL-6] - 4/2/1987Rep Lagomarsino, Robert J. [CA-19] - 4/2/1987Rep Leach, James A. [IA-1] - 4/2/1987Rep Leland, Mickey [TX-18] - 4/2/1987Rep Levine, Mel [CA-27] - 5/7/1987Rep Lipinski, William O. [IL-5] - 5/7/1987Rep Lott, Trent [MS-5] - 4/2/1987Rep Madigan, Edward R. [IL-15] - 5/7/1987Rep Markey, Edward J. [MA-7] - 4/2/1987Rep Marlenee, Ron [MT-2] - 4/2/1987Rep Martinez, Matthew G. [CA-30] - 5/7/1987Rep Murtha, John P. [PA-12] - 4/2/1987Rep Nielson, Howard C. - 4/2/1987Rep Oberstar, James L. [MN-8] - 4/2/1987Rep Owens, Major R. [NY-12] - 5/7/1987Rep Pepper, Claude [FL-18] - 4/2/1987 [u]Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-16] - 4/2/1987Rep Scheuer, James H. [NY-8] - 5/7/1987Rep Schroeder, Patricia [CO-1] - 4/2/1987Rep Schuette, Bill [MI-10] - 5/7/1987Rep Schumer, Charles E. [NY-10] - 4/2/1987Rep Solarz, Stephen J. [NY-13] - 5/7/1987 Rep Stenholm, Charles W. [TX-17] - 4/2/1987Rep Stokes, Louis [OH-21] - 4/2/1987Rep Sundquist, Don [TN-7] - 5/7/1987 Rep Synar, Mike [OK-2] - 5/7/1987 Rep Torres, Estaban Edward [CA-34] - 5/7/1987 Rep Udall, Morris K. [AZ-2] - 4/2/1987Rep Vento, Bruce F. [MN-4] - 5/7/1987Rep Walgren, Doug [PA-18] - 4/2/1987 Rep Waxman, Henry A. [CA-24] - 4/2/1987Rep Weber, Vin [MN-2] - 4/2/1987 Rep Weiss, Ted [NY-17] - 5/7/1987 Rep Wise, Robert E., Jr. [WV-3] - 5/7/1987Rep Wolpe, Howard E. [MI-3] - 5/7/1987 Rep Wyden, Ron [OR-3] - 4/2/1987Rep Yates, Sidney R. [IL-9] - 4/2/1987
In regard to the background concerning this issue, early in 1987 the FCC repealed the Fairness Doctrine of 1949. Then, Congress attempted to bring it back and a bill passed both Houses and President Reagan vetoed it and Congress was unable to gain enough votes [H.R. 1934, which Gingrich sponsored] to override the veto. The controversy was that part of the bill having the federal government providing `[I]` a reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.``
See: Reagan's Veto Kills Fairness Doctrine Bill (http://articles.latimes.com/1987-06-21/news/mn-8908_1_fairness-doctrine) ``June 21, 1987|PENNY PAGANO | Times Staff Writer WASHINGTON — President Reagan, intensifying the debate over whether the nation's broadcasters must present opposing views of controversial issues, has vetoed legislation to turn into law the 38-year-old ``fairness doctrine,`` the White House announced Saturday. The doctrine, instituted by the Federal Communications Commission as public policy in 1949, requires the nation`s radio and television stations to ``afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views on issues of public importance.```
I can`t believe Glenn Beck did not raise these two vital issues with Gingrich.
JWK