PDA

View Full Version : Report: Sharon Bialek fired from NRA for falsely accusing boss of Sexual Harassment?



Little-Acorn
11-08-2011, 01:57 PM
During yesterday's press conference with lawyer Gloria Allred, Sharon Bialek said that she used to work for the NRA (National Restaurant Association). Herman Cain was the President of the NRA at the time, though Bialek did not work for him. She said that in 1997 she was fired from the NRA. A month later, she contacted Herman Cain and asked for his help. She said that later when they met, Cain made an unwelcome and extremely crude and boorish advance, touching her inappropriately while saying, "You want a job, right?".

Why was she fired?

Here's an unverified accusation from someone who has not been identified, nor offered proof.

But those seem to be completely acceptable in this episode, so here goes.

-----------------------------------------------------

http://patdollard.com/2011/11/bialek-deconstructed-accustations-quickly-erode-under-scrutiny/

Report: Cain Accuser Bialek Fired From NRA For False Accustations Of Sexual Assault
November 8th, 2011

One might be asking themselves why Ms. Bialek was fired from the National Restaurant Association. After all, being fired, quite unlike simply being laid off, is a serious issue with serious ramifications; since leaving the Restuarant Association, Ms. Bialek has been unable to maintain regular employment. So why was this woman let go? Why has it seemingly affected her ability to remain employed for so long?

Perhaps it might have something to do with the reason she was fired from the National Restaurant Association in the first place…

FILING FALSE CLAIMS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT

“She was fired from her job, and her boyfriend suggested she contact Cain in hopes he could help her find employment.”.

In this particular incident she was fired for falsely accusing her boss of sexual harassment, a charge denied by co-workers, as well as being pretty much a pain in the ass to work with.

“I remember her as a time-waster, and rabble-rouser. If she didn’t get her way she cried about sexual harassment”. A former co-worker, a female no less, emailed me. “She was trouble with a capital “T”. The fact that she waited 13 years and never said a word not even during Cain’s earlier forays into politics. She only now magically appears because Cain is leading in some polls and proving a threat to Barack Obama?

Ms. Bialek claims that she informed her then-boyfriend after the incident – a man who cannot be contacted by media; an ABC interview with the fiance reveals that the new boyfriend only became aware of the story approximately 2 weeks ago (end of segment):

Further investigations suggest that Ms. Bialek has a “history” of using sexual harassment claims as a weapon in the workplace – LISTEN HERE
http://wlsam.com/FlashPlayer/default.asp?SPID=16521&ID=2329023

More from theChicago Tribune:

Bialek said she shared her allegations with her then-boyfriend and another male friend shortly after her meeting with Cain. However, the man she is now engaged to said she did not tell him about her history with the former Godfather’s Pizza CEO until Friday night, when she told him she was going to New York for the news conference.

red states rule
11-09-2011, 03:11 AM
Ah, mere details that are not important to the main objective of the "story" which is take out a threat to Obama

The liberal is also avoiding other "details"





CNN's Piers Morgan on Monday did the first interview with Herman Cain's accuser, but failed to ask Sharon Bialek - who was in the company of her liberal activist attorney Gloria Allred - any questions about her two bankruptcies, the paternity lawsuit her former husband filed against her shortly after their child was born, or exactly why she was terminated by the National Restaurant Association a month before the alleged actions by Cain took place.


Read more: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/11/08/piers-morgan-interviews-cain-accuser-without-asking-about-her-bankrup#ixzz1d9sT4m60