It's Not The Tea Parties That Have Been Exposed As Racists

[Kathianne]

Indeed not. Heck Think Progress had begun a project to expose such, even with making the broad assumption that if there were racist type signs, all were guilty by association. Even with that, just not enough to feed their site, so they shut it down.

Now where are they with OWS?

There seems to be a strong vein that runs through liberal groups in assuming that people of certain skin hues, religious beliefs, economic conditions, and sexual preferences should by those characteristics vote a certain way.

When crossed, they tend to go racist:

http://legalinsurrection.com/2011/10/saturday-night-card-game-calling-on-think-progress-to-play-the-guilt-by-association-card-on-occupy-wall-street/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/figures-nazi-party-throws-support-behind-occupy-wall-street-movement/

http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/14/anti-semitic-protester-at-occu

http://www.therightscoop.com/liz-trotta-left-exposing-inherent-racism-in-how-they-treat-herman-cain/

None of these are acceptable to most Americans, yet the left is getting the backing of folks like Obama and President of Goldman Sachs saying they are useful or are 'speaking out in frustration.' And the Germans in the 30's were doing what?

Now with the assumption that everyone here is able to read, don't knock the sites, follow the links...

[red states rule]

Also, did any Tea Party speaker say viloence would be neccessary to achieve their goals and demands?


<IFRAME height=315 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qlPY9AfQFqI" frameBorder=0 width=420 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>

[fj1200]

I suppose that's the right-wing Fascist Nazi's supporting OWS.

[Gunny]

Indeed not. Heck Think Progress had begun a project to expose such, even with making the broad assumption that if there were racist type signs, all were guilty by association. Even with that, just not enough to feed their site, so they shut it down.

Now where are they with OWS?

There seems to be a strong vein that runs through liberal groups in assuming that people of certain skin hues, religious beliefs, economic conditions, and sexual preferences should by those characteristics vote a certain way.

When crossed, they tend to go racist:

http://legalinsurrection.com/2011/10/saturday-night-card-game-calling-on-think-progress-to-play-the-guilt-by-association-card-on-occupy-wall-street/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/10/figures-nazi-party-throws-support-behind-occupy-wall-street-movement/

http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/14/anti-semitic-protester-at-occu

http://www.therightscoop.com/liz-trotta-left-exposing-inherent-racism-in-how-they-treat-herman-cain/

None of these are acceptable to most Americans, yet the left is getting the backing of folks like Obama and President of Goldman Sachs saying they are useful or are 'speaking out in frustration.' And the Germans in the 30's were doing what?

Now with the assumption that everyone here is able to read, don't knock the sites, follow the links...

It doesn't really matter with the left. If one doesn't agree with the leftist agenda, "racist" and "homophobe" are the first two accusation the left makes, no evidence required. I mean c'mon ... if one is a gay right winger, one gets called a fag by the left, the self-appointed champions of homosexuals everywhere.

Bottom line is up to this point if the lefts makes an accusation, the right tucks its little tail and runs. Ask Lott, Gingrich, Bonilla and/or Brown. All victims of leftwingnut witch hunting and media hysteria.

[red states rule]

The left showing their true feelings<IFRAME title="MRC TV video player" height=360 src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/106587" frameBorder=0 width=640 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>