Where Is Obama's Debt Plan?

[red states rule]

Jay Carney got a little rattled over having to explain Obama's debt plan when he has not one down on paper? Like his campaign, he offers poll tested one liners - but no specifics

<IFRAME height=349 src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7cqmMhzybek" frameBorder=0 width=425 allowfullscreen></IFRAME>

[Kathianne]

to reiterate you points:

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/HarrisPolls/tabid/447/mid/1508/articleId/840/ctl/ReadCustom%20Default/Default.aspx


President Obama Would Lose if Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani Was the Nominee Republican field problem is one of recognition - most are unknown NEW YORK , N.Y. - July 26, 2011 - By this time next summer the Republican candidate who will challenge President Obama will be known but at this point the list of candidates and potential candidates for the nomination is still far from finalized. With the "will-he-or-she-run-questions" still being asked and answered, some of the names with the highest familiarity among the general public are still not even declared candidates.


Obviously because of her run for Vice President with John McCain, almost nine in ten Americans (86%) are familiar with Sarah Palin and 75% of U.S. adults are familiar with Rudy Giuliani, both of whom are still undeclared, but possible candidates for the nomination. Majorities of Americans are familiar with declared candidates Newt Gingrich (72%), Mitt Romney (67%), and Ron Paul (52%) while half are familiar with Michele Bachmann (50%). All other potential candidates are at 30% or under in terms of familiarity.


These are some of the results of The Harris Poll of 2,183 adults surveyed online between July 11 and 18, 2011 by Harris Interactive (http://www.harrisinteractive.com/).


Even among Republicans, many declared candidates do not have majorities familiar with them. Tim Pawlenty (33%), Rick Santorum (31%), Herman Cain (29%), and Jon Huntsman (15%) all have one-third of Republicans or less familiar with them.


With this in mind, it's not surprising then that among Republicans over one-quarter (28%) say they are not at all sure who they would vote for if they were voting in the Republican primary. Rudy Giuliani (14%) and Mitt Romney (14%) rise to the top among Republicans followed by Sarah Palin (12%). All the other candidates presented are under 10% including Rick Perry (8%), Michele Bachmann (6%), and Ron Paul (5%). Among Independents there is a three way tie for "first place" between Rudy Giuliani (10%), Mitt Romney (10%) and Ron Paul (10%). But over two in five Independents (42%) say they are not at all sure who they would vote for in the Republican primary election.


Against President Obama



Looking ahead to November, it seems there are three possible candidates who could give President Obama a difficult time. President Obama would lose his re-election if Rudy Giuliani (53% to 47%) or Mitt Romney (51% to 49%) was the Republican nominee. Each candidate would receive 50% of the vote if the President was running against Ron Paul. Right now, President Obama would win re-election against the 10 other candidates presented....

[fj1200]

Giuliani is polling that high?

Run, Rudy, run.

[red states rule]

Giuliani is polling that high?

Run, Rudy, run.


Hell a generic Republican is beating Obama

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Obama-Republican-Gallup-2012/2011/07/14/id/403633

[andrew2382]

Obama doesn't lay out a plan because he doesn't have one. I am glad reporters on beating down on Carney and the country is seeing what an empty suit this guy really is

[red states rule]

Obama doesn't lay out a plan because he doesn't have one. I am glad reporters on beating down on Carney and the country is seeing what an empty suit this guy really is

and Dems did not present a budget for two yeasr even when they ran Congress becasue they were worried about the 2010 election

Again, nothing from the liberal media about it

[andrew2382]

and Dems did not present a budget for two yeasr even when they ran Congress becasue they were worried about the 2010 election

Again, nothing from the liberal media about it

and you will never hear about it. It's mind boggling how anyone can actually try and defend this administration

[red states rule]

and you will never hear about it. It's mind boggling how anyone can actually try and defend this administration

With liberals, truth matters less than gaining/keeping political power

[logroller]

Where is Obama's debt plan? Aren't we in the midst of it? I believe our debt is flourishing.

edit: Oh, wait..you probably meant debt reduction plan. Yeah, no, haven't seen that-- quite the opposite really.

[red states rule]

Where is Obama's debt plan? Aren't we in the midst of it? I believe our debt is flourishing.



That it is. At the rate of $180 million dollars per hour

and remember candidate Obama said Bush's reckless spending got us in this mess. However, the last budget deficit under Bush was around $480 billion dollars

[red states rule]

Where is Obama's debt plan? Aren't we in the midst of it? I believe our debt is flourishing.

edit: Oh, wait..you probably meant debt reduction plan. Yeah, no, haven't seen that-- quite the opposite really.

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/110727 blankslate RGB20110727105455.jpg

[Gunny]

Where is Obama's debt plan? Aren't we in the midst of it? I believe our debt is flourishing.

edit: Oh, wait..you probably meant debt reduction plan. Yeah, no, haven't seen that-- quite the opposite really.

No shit.

[J.T]

Where Is Obama's Debt Plan?

Same as Reagan's: Spend Our Way Out

[fj1200]

Same as Reagan's: Spend Our Way Out

Reagan controlled spending? Who knew?

[red states rule]

Whjile the most incompetent President in out history, Obama is smart enought to not to put anything on paper

He knows the liberal media and his fellow Dems will ignore any lies and broken promises he makes.

He is a bystander in this debate much lhe has been since he took office