Who Will Be The Angriest Liberal On TV On Election Night

[red states rule]

Please pick with liberal you think will best express their anger over the election results on TV as the results come in

I will go with Chris Matthews

The thrill be gone folks

[Little-Acorn]

Barack Obama.

[red states rule]

Barack Obama.

Good pick, but I doubt if he will show his face on Election night. He will leave that to Gibbs and Bite Me Biden

Besides, Obama is fleeing the country a few days after the election

[MtnBiker]

That Rachel Maddow guy.

[namvet]

Keith Overbite.

[chloe]

Keith Olberman

[namvet]

Keith Olberman

like a chain reaction

[NightTrain]

Keith will be spraying spittle at the camera.

[SassyLady]

Another one that should have a good rant is Lawrence O'Donnell.... Scary Larry???

I think he's been chastised a couple of times for his on air rants. Here he's being chastised by Joe Scarborough.



Larry “O’Scary” O’Donnell melts down again


By Michelle Malkin • February 12, 2010 10:56 AM
<EMBED height=344 type=application/x-shockwave-flash width=425 src=http://www.youtube.com/v/NsjuOcGATu0&hl=en_US&fs=1& allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></EMBED>
Yep, MSNBC’s Larry O’Donnell had another unhinged cable TV moment today. He’s been screaming on the airwaves for years. Joe Scarborough called the latest outburst on his show “psycho talk.” (http://www.politico.com/click/stories/1002/morning_joe_goes_crossfire.html)
Been there, done that. Again and again and again.

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/12/larry-oscary-odonnell-melts-down-again/

[red states rule]

Poor Chris, he may break down and cry tonight. Look how he is ready to breakdown here

You guys may be right. Keith may be the angriest while Chris may be the saddest

<object width="640" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_IVZw18lH7k&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_IVZw18lH7k&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></embed></object>

[SassyLady]

Oh, my goodness.....I love it!!! He's calling Obama an elitist....he talks like a jilted lover.

[red states rule]

Oh, my goodness.....I love it!!! He's calling Obama an elitist....he talks like a jilted lover.

http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/167871.jpg

[SassyLady]

The sad thing is that he's not upset with Obama for the policies he passed, he's upset because Obama lost his "connection" with the people and didn't sell his policies. Loved it when he alluded to the fact the the public "wasn't educated at Harvard like some of us (referring to himself and Obama)" and that Obama needed to explain to the public what he learned at Harvard about economics and how we had to run a deficit to get out of the slump.

Once again insulting the jury.

[red states rule]

The sad thing is that he's not upset with Obama for the policies he passed, he's upset because Obama lost his "connection" with the people and didn't sell his policies. Loved it when he alluded to the fact the the public "wasn't educated at Harvard like some of us (referring to himself and Obama)" and that Obama needed to explain to the public what he learned at Harvard about economics and how we had to run a deficit to get out of the slump.

Once again insulting the jury.

That is ione of the basic principals of liberalism. The people are too damn stupid know what is best for them - so they NEED the intellectually superior liberals to make those choices for them

As in every case when Dems lose an election, they will not blame their polices - they will blame the voters

I remember well in 1984 when Ronald Reagan won 49 states the Dems came out the next day and said they did not lose the election because the people rejected theri policies

They lost because the voters were bought by slick marketing and packaging