Christin O'Donnell actually said & believes these things [Archive] - Debate Policy

pete311

10-14-2010, 12:48 PM

"We took the Bible and prayer out of public schools. Now we're having weekly shootings. We had the 60s sexual revolution, and now people are dying of AIDS."

"God may choose to heal someone from cancer, yet that person still has a great deal of medical bills. The outstanding bills do not determine whether or not the patient has been healed by God."

"A candidate said several years ago, 'I'm not concerned the reason you vote for me as long as you vote for me.'"

"America is now a socialist economy. The definition of a socialist economy is when 50% or more your economy is dependent on the federal government."

"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."

"You know what, evolution is a myth... Why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans?"

"During the primary, I heard the audible voice of God. He said, 'Credibility.'"

Little-Acorn

10-14-2010, 01:14 PM

Really scraping the bottom of the barrel for things to bash conservatives for, aren't we?

:laugh:

Pagan

10-14-2010, 01:32 PM

She's got a lot of skeletons in her closet -

In a 2005 lawsuit, O’Donnell implied she was working toward a Master’s degree at Princeton University; but she later acknowledged never having taken any graduate courses there. She has claimed that she studied Post Modernism in the New Millennium at Oxford University in England; but that claim was called "misleading" by The Washington Post as she took only a course run by an unaffiliated institution called the Phoenix Institute, which was merely renting space at Oxford.
As of late September 2010, O'Donnell's LinkedIn profile stated that she had attended Claremont Graduate University near Los Angeles in California; but the University said there is "no student or education record for an individual named Christine O'Donnell." O'Donnell said in response, "I never established a LinkedIn profile or authorized anyone to do so on my behalf.” Yet, days earlier, O’Donnell’s staff, when asked specifically about her profile on three occasions by the Associated Press and The Washington Post, made no reference to the profile being unauthorized. A few days later, however, when O’Donnell’s possible academic embellishments became an issue, O’Donnell’s staff asked LinkedIn to remove the profile

Silver

10-14-2010, 02:05 PM

I would not, in any fashion, defend this women or her beliefs....mainly because I don't know her or what she actually believes....she will not win office in Delaware....
But the quotes intrigue me nonetheless....

"We took the Bible and prayer out of public schools. Now we're having weekly shootings. We had the 60s sexual revolution, and now people are dying of AIDS."

The implication that A caused B is her opinion....she entitled to hers as you are to yours, a case can be made for and against that implication....but the facts are undeniable...

We have taken the Bible out of public schools
We have frequent shootings
We had a sexual revolution, and
People are dying of AIDS/HIV

"God may choose to heal someone from cancer, yet that person still has a great deal of medical bills. The outstanding bills do not determine whether or not the patient has been healed by God."

About 85% of US citizens, believe in God.
I dare say that most, if not all, of those that truly believe in some omnipotent GOD would agree with this statement/opinion...they think that everything that happens is God's will....

"A candidate said several years ago, 'I'm not concerned the reason you vote for me as long as you vote for me.'"

Can you prove some candidate didn't say it?...It sounds like something a politician would say....it even sounds slightly familiar.

"America is now a socialist economy. The definition of a socialist economy is when 50% or more your economy is dependent on the federal government."

Another opinion to me, but incorrectly stated as fact....I can actually see a case for this opinion but it certainly isn't a fact....

"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."

"You know what, evolution is a myth... Why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans?"

These two just are the rants of someone that is utterly ignorant in the field of science....shows a definite touch of stupid to say anything like this and then strive to be taken seriously....

"During the primary, I heard the audible voice of God. He said, 'Credibility.'"
People that hear voices scare me.....any voices. And have no "credibility" in my mind.

Little-Acorn

10-14-2010, 02:27 PM

The leftists, of course, do not mention the things that really scare them about O'Donnell: She is mostly conservative, and wants to reduce government, lower taxes AND spending, and remove many programs that government currently runs.

But you won't find them talking about THOSE beliefs. Because the leftists know they cannot rationally justify teir oppositions to them, nor its real reasons: That they don't trust the people to make their own decisions. They think the country will be worse off if people are allowed to do that.

So they keep carping about oddball quotes, dredged-up college dates, etc.

Pretty sad.

gabosaurus

10-14-2010, 03:49 PM

Did anyone listen to the debate O'Donnell engaged in with the Dem guy on Wed. night? She is a total loon. I could care less if she is Democrat or Republican. The woman is not informed. She is OK when someone is feeding her answers to tough questions. But when put on the spot, she is clueless.
I am glad she is running for office in Delaware and not someplace else.

NightTrain

10-14-2010, 05:01 PM

She's better looking than I am, smarter, better educated and is conservative, therefore my handlers at MoveOn have directed me to spew forth my vile and baseless hatred for the woman - a la Sarah Palin.

Fixed.:boobies:

Noir

10-14-2010, 05:53 PM

Oh well, she may be a bit of an idiot, but if the person she's running against is worse in the voters eyes then it doesnt matter how randomly foolish she is.

darin

10-14-2010, 05:59 PM

"We took the Bible and prayer out of public schools. Now we're having weekly shootings. We had the 60s sexual revolution, and now people are dying of AIDS."

Those are facts. She didn't assign causation.

"God may choose to heal someone from cancer, yet that person still has a great deal of medical bills. The outstanding bills do not determine whether or not the patient has been healed by God."

Again, factual statements.

"A candidate said several years ago, 'I'm not concerned the reason you vote for me as long as you vote for me.'"

Shouldn't you be upset at the candidate who said that?

"America is now a socialist economy. The definition of a socialist economy is when 50% or more your economy is dependent on the federal government."

How do you define socialist economy?

"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."

GOOD - if that's true, Liberals will no longer have an excuse ;)

"You know what, evolution is a myth... Why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans?"

Again - those are true statements. Evolution is a theory - in the eyes of many scientists, it's a theory with gaping holes. And another truth - Monkeys are not evolving into anything but other monkeys. True statement.

"During the primary, I heard the audible voice of God. He said, 'Credibility.'"

Okay? What's the problem? She has faith in a deity. She believes that deity interacts with her. I'd guestimate 75% of the world's population feels their deity does the same thing.

Critical thinking - look into it.

pete311

10-14-2010, 07:21 PM

Those are facts. She didn't assign causation.

Please! She is obviously asserting causation otherwise it's an idiotic non-sequitur string.

Again, factual statements.

No, it's a down right silly statement.

Shouldn't you be upset at the candidate who said that?

She is inferring a similar stance

How do you define socialist economy?

Read it sometime
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Again - those are true statements. Evolution is a theory - in the eyes of many scientists, it's a theory with gaping holes. And another truth - Monkeys are not evolving into anything but other monkeys. True statement.

Do you even know what a theory is? It means we observe something happening and we are attempting to explain it. Call it whatever you want, but it's not a myth. You should really take a biology class.

Okay? What's the problem? She has faith in a deity. She believes that deity interacts with her. I'd guestimate 75% of the world's population feels their deity does the same thing.

Yeah I don't want that 75% of god hearing wackos running for office in the USA. Do you?

Critical thinking - look into it.

I am amazed that you take yourself seriously.

darin

10-14-2010, 07:36 PM

Please! She is obviously asserting causation otherwise it's an idiotic non-sequitur string.

Speculation because you don't like her.

No, it's a down right silly statement.

You know what they say about OPINIONS

She is inferring a similar stance

To you, who hates her and all things non-liberal. Sure.
That's your choice, however. Don't confuse your choice with truisms.

Read it sometime
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Doesn't answer the question.

Do you even know what a theory is? It means we observe something happening and we are attempting to explain it. Call it whatever you want, but it's not a myth. You should really take a biology class.

...then Macro evolution isn't a theory??? That what you are saying? It's certainly NOT observable. I was being generous to the line of thinking.

Yeah I don't want that 75% of god hearing wackos running for office in the USA. Do you?

You are saying you're FINE with the other 25% of wackos running for office? Odd. What does that have to do with my statement though? I wasn't talking about wackos, I was talking about the VERY VAST majority of the world's population. You just hate things like "Truth" and "Faith" so you are inherently biased against what, based on stats, would be "Normal" ways of thinking - if Normal = 'thinking that goes along w/ the mainstream/majority.

I am amazed that you take yourself seriously.

How nice. :)

pete311

10-14-2010, 07:51 PM

To you, who hates her and all things non-liberal. Sure.
That's your choice, however. Don't confuse your choice with truisms.

God and truisms do not mix.

Doesn't answer the question.

yes it does

...then Macro evolution isn't a theory??? That what you are saying? It's certainly NOT observable. I was being generous to the line of thinking.

Contrary to this belief among the anti-evolution movement proponents, evolution of life forms beyond the species level ("macroevolution", i.e. speciation in a specific case) has indeed been observed multiple times under both controlled laboratory conditions and in nature.[10] The claim that macroevolution does not occur, or is impossible, is thus demonstrably false and without support in the scientific community.

Such claims are rejected by the scientific community on the basis of ample evidence that macroevolution is an active process both presently and in the past.[5][11] The terms macroevolution and microevolution relate to the same processes operating at different scales, but creationist claims misuse the terms in a vaguely defined way which does not accurately reflect scientific usage, acknowledging well observed evolution as "microevolution" and denying that "macroevolution" takes place.[5][12] Evolutionary theory (including macroevolutionary change) remains the dominant scientific paradigm for explaining the origins of Earth's biodiversity. Its occurrence is not disputed within the scientific community.[13] While details of macroevolution are continuously studied by the scientific community, the overall theory behind macroevolution (i.e. common descent) has been overwhelmingly consistent with empirical data. Predictions of empirical data from the theory of common descent have been so consistent that biologists often refer to it as the "fact of evolution"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolution

You are saying you're FINE with the other 25% of wackos running for office? Odd.

No, I'm saying it's a good start to rule our people who hear voices in their heads. I don't care that she has faith.

Abbey Marie

10-14-2010, 10:19 PM

When I saw the thread title, I was worried that there would be some crazy statements listed. I was relieved to see that they are not bad at all.
I am mulling over helping with her campaign here in Delaware. If my arm wasn't broken, I would have by now. Go Christine! :salute:

pete311

10-14-2010, 10:48 PM

When I saw the thread title, I was worried that there would be some crazy statements listed. I was relieved to see that they are not bad at all.

really? REALLY? did you read this one particularly?

"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."

You want this person to run the country? holy balls! know wonder you guys don't know jackshit about evolution when you buy some absolute bullshit like the above statement.

Little-Acorn

10-14-2010, 11:54 PM

You want this person to run the country?

Nope. We want her to help get government out of the way, so that the American people can run the country as it was designed to be run. She sounds smart, willing and able to do that. Desperate liberal attempts at "gotcha" are unimportant. Except to liberals, of course.

The leftists, of course, do not mention the things that really scare them about O'Donnell: She is mostly conservative, and wants to reduce government, lower taxes AND spending, and remove many programs that government currently runs.

But you won't find them talking about THOSE beliefs. Because the leftists know they cannot rationally justify teir oppositions to them, nor its real reasons: That they don't trust the people to make their own decisions. They think the country will be worse off if people are allowed to do that.

So they keep carping about oddball quotes, dredged-up college dates, etc.

Pretty sad.

Kathianne

10-15-2010, 12:01 AM

Nope. We want her to help get government out of the way, so that the American people can run the country as it was designed to be run. She sounds smart, willing and able to do that. Desperate liberal attempts at "gotcha" are unimportant. Except to liberals, of course.

The leftists, of course, do not mention the things that really scare them about O'Donnell: She is mostly conservative, and wants to reduce government, lower taxes AND spending, and remove many programs that government currently runs.

But you won't find them talking about THOSE beliefs. Because the leftists know they cannot rationally justify teir oppositions to them, nor its real reasons: That they don't trust the people to make their own decisions. They think the country will be worse off if people are allowed to do that.

So they keep carping about oddball quotes, dredged-up college dates, etc.

Pretty sad.

I don't know enough about her, I tend to like people that don't get caught misspeaking, but it happens. Most of these candidates are new and because they are winning primaries, 'they had no business winning,' they are getting much more coverage by media than usual. Untested candidates often say stupid things, like visiting all '57 states. 2 more to go.'

pete311

10-15-2010, 12:58 AM

The leftists, of course, do not mention the things that really scare them about O'Donnell: She is mostly conservative, and wants to reduce government, lower taxes AND spending, and remove many programs that government currently runs.

Awesome qualifications! I guess tens of millions of Americans who also share those views are qualified for running the country. Not!

pete311

10-15-2010, 12:59 AM

I don't know enough about her, I tend to like people that don't get caught misspeaking, but it happens. Most of these candidates are new and because they are winning primaries, 'they had no business winning,' they are getting much more coverage by media than usual. Untested candidates often say stupid things, like visiting all '57 states. 2 more to go.'

She's not new. I think she's been campaigning for office since 2002. She has just latched on to the Tea Party and it worked.

darin

10-15-2010, 02:07 AM

God and truisms do not mix.

yes it does

No, I'm saying it's a good start to rule our people who hear voices in their heads. I don't care that she has faith.

You're a christophobe who can't see beyond his own nose. Why the hate? Doesn't your people proclaim to be the champions of 'stop the hate'???

Gaffer

10-15-2010, 07:13 AM

Awesome qualifications! I guess tens of millions of Americans who also share those views are qualified for running the country. Not!

yes they are. we select someone to run things. If they do a poor job they are replaced. It's a freedom thing, but you wouldn't understand that.

PostmodernProphet

10-15-2010, 07:26 AM

PostmodernProphet

10-15-2010, 07:28 AM

She is inferring a similar stance

no, YOU are inferring a similar stance....for all I know, her next statement may have been, "and that man was a fool"........

pete311

10-15-2010, 09:41 AM

You're a christophobe who can't see beyond his own nose. Why the hate? Doesn't your people proclaim to be the champions of 'stop the hate'???

what hate? is it so wrong to not want someone at the nuclear trigger who is taking orders from a voice in their head?

yes they are. we select someone to run things. If they do a poor job they are replaced. It's a freedom thing, but you wouldn't understand that.

great, let's get joe the plummer in there are see how he does. after all, we can just put in joe the bank teller in four years if the plumber doesn't work out. how idiotic...

actually, in the excerpts I have seen on the news she whupped his ass.....

nah, she was embarrassing. people think palin is a moron, but o'donnell... wow

no, YOU are inferring a similar stance....for all I know, her next statement may have been, "and that man was a fool"........

no, because that quote was said when O'Donnell was questioned on sending out pictures of herself in a bikini to attract voters

gabosaurus

10-15-2010, 10:14 AM

O'Donnell is a loon. If she hadn't attached herself to the teabagger band wagon in hopes of finally winning an election, none of you would care about her.

PostmodernProphet

10-15-2010, 10:35 AM

no, because that quote was said when O'Donnell was questioned on sending out pictures of herself in a bikini to attract voters

heard it.....simply proves she' smarter than the idiot reporter who asked it and folks like you that took it seriously..........

PostmodernProphet

10-15-2010, 10:38 AM

O'Donnell is a loon. If she hadn't attached herself to the teabagger band wagon in hopes of finally winning an election, none of you would care about her.
so what's the headline going to be the first Wednesday in November?...."Yesterday the Democratic candidate for Joe Biden's seat came in second to a loon!"......

pete311

10-15-2010, 10:46 AM

so what's the headline going to be the first Wednesday in November?...."Yesterday the Democratic candidate for Joe Biden's seat came in second to a loon!"......

Do you know anything about Delaware? It's been heavily democratic for like 20 years. She doesn't have a chance.

Abbey Marie

10-15-2010, 11:16 AM

really? REALLY? did you read this one particularly?

"American scientific companies are cross-breeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains."

You want this person to run the country? holy balls! know wonder you guys don't know jackshit about evolution when you buy some absolute bullshit like the above statement.

I wasn't aware that she was running for President.

And how do you know that something similar to this isn't being attempted? Are you in every research lab in the country? I don't know either, so I wouldn't try to say that I do.

Also, since it is common knowledge that Christine was on TV making comments back when she was in high school, care to tell us when the statement was made, and in what context?

With all the Republicans leading the polls right now, one must wonder why O'Donnell is the whipping boy. Perhaps libs cannot countenance attractive, Conservative, Christian women? More than a bit of misogyny and Christian-phobia going on here, methinks.

pete311

10-15-2010, 11:43 AM

I wasn't aware that she was running for President.

Senators also run the country...

And how do you know that something similar to this isn't being attempted? Are you in every research lab in the country? I don't know either, so I wouldn't try to say that I do.

Trust me, if mice were being controlled by a human brain, we'd have heard about it by now. It would be freakin world headline news. I also have many friends at CERN, FERMI Lab and plenty of biology professor friends. Maybe she was referencing the Mice Chimera project, but growing an ear on a mouse is much different than a mouse being controlled by a human brain!

Also, since it is common knowledge that Christine was on TV making comments back when she was in high school, care to tell us when the statement was made, and in what context?

So now you think we've been having human brain controlled mice for the past 25 years? As far as I can tell she made the claim in 2007.

With all the Republicans leading the polls right now, one must wonder why O'Donnell is the whipping boy. Perhaps libs cannot countenance attractive, Conservative, Christian women? More than a bit of misogyny and Christian-phobia going on here, methinks.

I don't care that she is a women, conservative or a christian. I have attacked none of those traits. I attack her ignorance, incompetence and her utter disregard for anything that resembles an intelligent remark.

NightTrain

10-15-2010, 12:18 PM

Senators also run the country...

However, they do not have their "finger on the nuclear trigger" as you seem to think.

NightTrain

10-15-2010, 12:33 PM

Yeah I don't want that 75% of god hearing wackos running for office in the USA. Do you?

So apparently you don't subscribe to a "Government of the people, by the people, for the people..." ?

You need to be a godless liberal in order to be qualified for office?

I don't think I'd like to live in your Utopia.

pete311

10-15-2010, 01:48 PM

You need to be a godless liberal in order to be qualified for office?

If you hear voices in your head, you are not qualified. You people keep trying to make it a religion thing.

Little-Acorn

10-15-2010, 01:59 PM

Yeah I don't want that 75% of god hearing wackos running for office in the USA. Do you?

I sympathize with your desire that the American people NOT be allowed to choose their own government unless the candidates are pre-qualified by YOU.

It jives with your obvious conviction that most Americans can't be trusted to make their own decisions, choose their own government, or be responsible for their own lives.

Unfortunately for you, your desires conflict with the most fundamental American ideal: That regular people CAN make their own decisions, guide their own fates, and abide by the consequences without being "rescued" by superior do-gooders such as yourself.

Perhaps you can go ply your wares in some other country that is not built on that fundamental ideal, that you abhor so much?

But please stop trying to mess this one up. This country's philosophy, and yours, just don't get along.

And the Constitution says, you lose.
Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya...... :dance:

.

pete311

10-15-2010, 02:13 PM

I sympathize with your desire that the American people NOT be allowed to choose their own government unless the candidates are pre-qualified by YOU.

And the Constitution says, you lose.
Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya...... :dance:

I lose? Christine O'Donnell won't get anywhere near the senate seat. She will never be president. It appears the vast majority of the nation feels the same as me. Nutters don't belong in office. It's just the fringe wackos like the ones here that give her an relevance.

Kathianne

10-15-2010, 02:19 PM

She's not new. I think she's been campaigning for office since 2002. She has just latched on to the Tea Party and it worked.

and Mr. 57 states and counting had served in both IL and US Senate, no matter how little time he spent there. They screw up.

NightTrain

10-15-2010, 02:23 PM

Kathianne

10-15-2010, 02:23 PM

Little-Acorn

10-15-2010, 02:35 PM

.

Careful..... pete311 is checking up on you!!!

.

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/sk101510dAPR20101015124557.jpg

pete311

10-15-2010, 02:47 PM

So why your drama? My guess is just a general meltdown on what is about to transpire in YOUR country. Shouldn't you be out insulting minorities that are too dumb to get out and vote?

just venting annoyance. yeah i should do that!

Gaffer

10-15-2010, 05:47 PM

Do you know anything about Delaware? It's been heavily democratic for like 20 years. She doesn't have a chance.

yeah sorta like that mass. seat that is now held by Scott Brown.

SassyLady

10-16-2010, 02:58 AM

Senators also run the country...

Trust me, if mice were being controlled by a human brain, we'd have heard about it by now. It would be freakin world headline news. I also have many friends at CERN, FERMI Lab and plenty of biology professor friends. Maybe she was referencing the Mice Chimera project, but growing an ear on a mouse is much different than a mouse being controlled by a human brain!

So now you think we've been having human brain controlled mice for the past 25 years? As far as I can tell she made the claim in 2007.

I don't care that she is a women, conservative or a christian. I have attacked none of those traits. I attack her ignorance, incompetence and her utter disregard for anything that resembles an intelligent remark.

So, using this same criteria you would attack Biden....just for starters...who is truly, just "one heartbeat away from being the most powerful man in the world?" Get real Pete...you only attacks conservatives, and not the ignorant, imcompetent and stupid people on your side of the aisle.

PostmodernProphet

10-16-2010, 07:10 AM

If you hear voices in your head, you are not qualified. You people keep trying to make it a religion thing.

lol, for the last ten years the left has been pretending this is a "religious" thing.....

BoogyMan

10-17-2010, 01:05 PM

NightTrain

10-17-2010, 07:17 PM

Did you vote for the far left wing fringe wacko in the whitehouse now?

I'd bet money on it.

SassyLady

10-17-2010, 07:24 PM

I'd bet money on it.

Me too!!

avatar4321

10-17-2010, 11:01 PM

I've seen crazier things out of the President of the United States. So what?

My two questions are:

1) If she is a guarenteed loser, what does it matter what she says?
2) If she is a guarenteed loser, why are Democrats spending more time and money in Delaware campaigning against her?

red states rule

10-19-2010, 04:50 AM

I lose? Christine O'Donnell won't get anywhere near the senate seat. She will never be president. It appears the vast majority of the nation feels the same as me. Nutters don't belong in office. It's just the fringe wackos like the ones here that give her an relevance.

No now a wacko is someone who wants the government to live within its means, supporting lower taxes so people can keep more of the money they earn, repealing unconstitutional bills like Obamacare, less government influenence in the free market, and allowing more domestic energy exploration?

If so you have to include a majoriy of the voters in your description of those who will win many of the elections on Nov 2

gabosaurus

10-19-2010, 04:44 PM

How can anyone vote for a candidate who is clueless about the First amendment to the Constitution of the United States? O'Donnell is only on the ballot because she is a teabagger.

Later when questioned about other constitutional points, O’Donnell said: “I’m sorry I didn’t bring my Constitution with me. Fortunately senators don’t have to memorize the Constitution.”

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-odonnell-constitution-20101020,0,1959365.story

NightTrain

10-19-2010, 05:49 PM

How can anyone vote for a candidate who is clueless about the First amendment to the Constitution of the United States? O'Donnell is only on the ballot because she is a teabagger.

She sure is pretty, isn't she?

red states rule

10-19-2010, 06:06 PM

How can anyone vote for a candidate who is clueless about the First amendment to the Constitution of the United States? O'Donnell is only on the ballot because she is a teabagger.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-odonnell-constitution-20101020,0,1959365.story

Speaking of clueless Gabby, why did you vote for Obama?

How is all that hope and change doing for you?

The TEa PArty will win elections on Nov 2 Gabby, and I do hope they push for the needed changes we need

I would hope you would too for the sake of your daughter

Kathianne

10-19-2010, 06:07 PM

How can anyone vote for a candidate who is clueless about the First amendment to the Constitution of the United States? O'Donnell is only on the ballot because she is a teabagger.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-odonnell-constitution-20101020,0,1959365.story

Like Coons?

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/10/19/chris-coons-cant-name-the-five-freedoms-in-the-first-amendment/

NightTrain

10-19-2010, 07:41 PM

Like Coons?

http://michellemalkin.com/2010/10/19/chris-coons-cant-name-the-five-freedoms-in-the-first-amendment/

It would appear that the Liberal that O'Donnell was debating is the one that doesn't know what the First Amendment includes.

How does that make you feel, Gabby? Sexier than you and also more knowledgeable than your ignorant liberal she's running against. Twit.

Nice work, Kathi. Malkin rocks my socks.