PDA

View Full Version : Billions for 'green jobs,' whatever they are



red states rule
06-11-2010, 05:03 AM
These are the same green jobs that brought economic prosperity to Spain and Greece





Buried deep inside a federal newsletter on March 16 was something called a "notice of solicitation of comments" from the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the Department of Labor.

"BLS is responsible for developing and implementing the collection of new data on green jobs," said the note in the Federal Register, which is widely read by government bureaucrats and almost never seen by the general public. But the notice said there is "no widely accepted standard definition of 'green jobs.'" To help find that definition, the Labor Department asked that readers send in suggestions.

The notice came only after the department scoured studies from government, academia, and business in search of a definition. "The common thread through the studies and discussions is that green jobs are jobs related to preserving or restoring the environment," the notice said. Duh! Beyond that, a precise definition has eluded Labor Department officials.

On Capitol Hill, a staffer for Sen. Charles Grassley, ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, was poring through the Federal Register and spotted the note. Then he went to the Department of Labor Web site, where he found a number of announcements like these:

** U.S. Department of Labor Announces $100 Million in Green Jobs Training through Recovery Act

** U.S. Department of Labor Announces $150 Million in "Pathways Out of Poverty" Training Grants for Green Jobs

** U.S. Department of Labor Announces Nearly $190 Million in State Energy Sector Partnership and Training Grants for Green Jobs

In the staffer's mind, two and two came together. The Labor Department is shoving money out the door for "green jobs," yet at the same time is admitting it doesn't know what a "green job" is.

Cue Grassley, a longtime watchdog of funny business in the federal bureaucracy. In a June 2 letter to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, Grassley noted that there was an enormous amount of money in the $862 billion stimulus bill for those still-undefined green jobs.

"According to the administration, the Recovery Act contains more than $80 billion in clean energy funding to promote economic recovery and develop clean energy jobs," Grassley wrote. "However, it has come to my attention that the [Labor Department] is just now attempting to define what a 'green job' is. Interestingly, this comes more than a year after the Recovery Act was signed into law and after millions of dollars in funding have already been distributed for green jobs."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Billions-for-_green-jobs__-whatever-they-area-96098934.html

SassyLady
06-11-2010, 05:33 AM
Must be governmental jobs? Just another way to expand the government.

red states rule
06-11-2010, 05:35 AM
Must be governmental jobs? Just another way to expand the government.

Thise jobs usually cost 3 or 4 times the cost of private sector jobs - and produce much less i actual results

Again, look at well green jobs are doing in Europe

SassyLady
06-11-2010, 05:39 AM
Thise jobs usually cost 3 or 4 times the cost of private sector jobs - and produce much less i actual results

Again, look at well green jobs are doing in Europe

I live in CA, I know what it's like to deal with environmental wackos. Look what they did to the Central Valley .... and green jobs is just another layer of environmentalism. :tinfoil:

red states rule
06-11-2010, 05:43 AM
I live in CA, I know what it's like to deal with environmental wackos. Look what they did to the Central Valley .... and green jobs is just another layer of environmentalism. :tinfoil:

It is also fun to watch how the same libs who DEMAND YOU use less energy, NEVER reduce their own energy consumption

Example One: Al Gores New House

I do not see any solar panels on the roof. Do you?

http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slideshows/6880/slide_6880_91230_large.jpg