PDA

View Full Version : Obama's One World Order



SassyLady
05-23-2010, 02:34 AM
On the surface this seems reasonable, however, I have the feeling it is just a front for his belief that there should be one government for all nations and that he should be the leader of that government. He will destroy America from within and then court the international political landscape and convince them he can make the changes needed. Using the Alinksy method .... create a cascade of crises and then overwhelm people and pass as many laws and treaties as possible while people are reacting.



Updated May 22, 2010
At West Point, Obama Presses for New World Order to Defeat Al Qaeda

President Obama on Saturday vowed to press for a new international order "that can resolve the challenges of our times" and help the United States defeat Al Qaeda and other threats to freedom.

Delivering the commencement speech at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, Obama ticked off a list of lofty goals this new order could accomplish; from combating violent extremism to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons to stemming climate change and sustaining global growth.

While saying he was "clear-eyed about the shortfalls" of the international system that has led many critics of the United Nations and other institutions to abandon multilateralism, Obama said the United States would move ahead on a policy of "national renewal and global leadership."

"We have succeeded by steering those currents in the direction of liberty and justice -- so nations thrive by meeting their responsibilities, and face consequences when they don't," he said.

Saturday's comments suggest the Obama administration may be ready to more vigorously court the international community's support, and further distance itself from the "distinctly American internationalism" pursued by George W. Bush.

More: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/22/obama-focus-wars-abroad-speech-west-point-graduates/

SassyLady
05-24-2010, 03:00 PM
Latest:

May 24, 2010
Obama Call for 'International Order' Raises Questions About U.S. Sovereignty

President Obama is facing criticism for his declaration over the weekend that he would seek a new "international order," with some questioning how much U.S. sovereignty the administration is willing to cede in exchange for more global cooperation.

Obama, delivering the commencement speech Saturday at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, said that "stronger international standards and institutions" and stronger alliances can "resolve" challenges ranging from terrorism to nuclear proliferation to climate change to economic decline.

"Our adversaries would like to see America sap its strength by overextending our power," Obama said. "So we have to shape an international order that can meet the challenges of our generation."

The president added that efforts by America's armed forces need to be "complemented" with greater diplomatic engagement "from grand capitals to dangerous outposts," more humanitarian assistance to needy nations, better communications among intelligence agencies, first responders to act after earthquakes, storms and disease and "law enforcement that can strengthen judicial systems abroad, and protect us at home."

"America has not succeeded by stepping outside the currents of cooperation; we have succeeded by steering those currents in the direction of liberty and justice -- so nations thrive by meeting their responsibilities, and face consequences when they don't," he told the graduating class at the military academy.

"This engagement is not an end in itself. The international order we seek is one that can resolve the challenges of our times -- countering violent extremism and insurgency; stopping the spread of nuclear weapons and securing nuclear materials; combating a changing climate and sustaining global growth; helping countries feed themselves and care for their sick; preventing conflict and healing its wounds," he said.

The address seemed to mark a greater departure from the so-called "Bush Doctrine" than past Obama speeches like the president's address to Muslim nations last summer in Cairo. The Bush administration's approach to foreign affairs, dubbed the "Bush Doctrine," generally included a policy of unilateralism and the right to preemptive strike, among other tenets.

The address also drew a split reaction. Conservatives claimed Obama was putting undue faith in global institutions while progressives said he was rightly turning away from Bush-era policy.

"He recognizes that you can't solve the economic, the military or the environmental problems by yourself, even if you wanted to," said Lawrence Korb, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. "You simply can't do it without working with other nations, so I think it's important to start doing that."

KT McFarland, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for Ronald Reagan and a Fox News contributor, said the president is moving further from the view of "American exceptionalism."

"It's a very international sense that America is just one of many, that we are not going to be a superpower in leading the world and I think it's a very dangerous mindset and trend," she said.

more:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/24/obama-international-order-raises-questions-sovereignty/

hortysir
05-24-2010, 05:07 PM
What a crock'o'chit......

We defeated the world's biggest superpower to gain our independence and struggled and strived to keep that title for ourselves only to surrender it to be part of some all-equal socialized agenda of a freaking MORON?
:lame2:

Binky
05-24-2010, 06:02 PM
That New World Order goes back decades. The powers that be have been steering the world into that direction at least since the 1950's. They have crept around below the radar doing their sneaky agendas so the citizens doesn't find out what they are doing.

What I wonder about is are leaders of countries such as England, Germany, France, China, Iran, Iraq, Russia etc. willing to sit in the back seat and let an American president become the soul leader of the entire world? Seems rather odd to me that certain leaders would allow it. Such as Chevez.......

Psychoblues
07-03-2010, 03:57 AM
What a crock of shit. Pitiful fear mongering by the most fearful among us.

:beer::salute::beer:

Psychoblues

Palin Rider
08-18-2010, 10:08 PM
"One love, one heart
Let's get together and feel all right!" :laugh2: