View Full Version : Elena Kagan - separated at birth?
MtnBiker
05-10-2010, 01:32 PM
http://www.observer.com/files/full/l_frankluntz.jpghttp://nimg.sulekha.com/others/original700/elena-kagan-2010-4-9-15-38-31.jpg
Maybe Frank Luntz can give us some insight. :D
hjmick
05-10-2010, 02:21 PM
Or maybe this guy:
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/mike-myers-austin-powers-in-goldmember-premiere-1CLIm6.jpg
sybarite
05-10-2010, 02:22 PM
http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc68/snowridergo/democratwomen.jpg
sybarite
05-10-2010, 02:25 PM
I think she's related to her.
http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc68/snowridergo/rosie.jpg
Abbey Marie
05-10-2010, 02:25 PM
Well, my gaydar certainly went off. Anyone know if she's married, or even has ever dated a man? I did read that she is vehemently against "Don't ask, don't tell".
And before our homo-philic members ask me what difference it makes, I am curious, okay?
hjmick
05-10-2010, 02:33 PM
Well, my gaydar certainly went off. Anyone know if she's married, or even has ever dated a man? I did read that she is vehemently against "Don't ask, don't tell".
And before our homo-philic members ask me what difference it makes, I am curious, okay?
She's "single." Drudge has a link to an article in the Daily Princetonian in which there is a brief mention of her sexuality. Let's just say that your "gaydar" is probably not wrong. Not that it matters.
Here, save you some time:
Reserved passion: Kagan ’81 (http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2010/05/03/26081/)
gabosaurus
05-10-2010, 03:21 PM
http://i40.tinypic.com/258o1ht.jpg
http://i42.tinypic.com/1zl3987.jpg
LiberalNation
05-10-2010, 03:33 PM
told ya, awesome, first gay justice.
avatar4321
05-10-2010, 06:45 PM
Or maybe this guy:
http://www.exposay.com/celebrity-photos/mike-myers-austin-powers-in-goldmember-premiere-1CLIm6.jpg
That was the first person i thought of when I saw her.
BoogyMan
05-10-2010, 08:34 PM
Kagan was in Total Recall, who knew?
http://wizbangblog.com/images/2010/05/solicitorgeneral04.jpg
http://wizbangblog.com/images/2010/05/total%20recall.jpg
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
red states rule
05-11-2010, 05:11 AM
told ya, awesome, first gay justice.
So is that why you would support for her for the USSC? How about her experience in judging cases?
Oh, she NEVER served as a Judge
I think it is telling Obama - who had zero experience for his job - nominates someone who has zero experience for the Supreme Court
Abbey Marie
05-11-2010, 09:12 AM
So is that why you would support for her for the USSC? How about her experience in judging cases?
Oh, she NEVER served as a Judge
I think it is telling Obama - who had zero experience for his job - nominates someone who has zero experience for the Supreme Court
No experience, and no chance of being over-ruled. Whoopee- here we go! :rolleyes: :eek: :scared::bang3::poop::no: :uhoh:
sybarite
05-11-2010, 09:41 AM
So is that why you would support for her for the USSC? How about her experience in judging cases?
Oh, she NEVER served as a Judge
I think it is telling Obama - who had zero experience for his job - nominates someone who has zero experience for the Supreme Court
Yeah, it's kind of like me being head surgeon without ever preforming surgery before. Scary isn't it?
avatar4321
05-11-2010, 10:35 AM
I don't have a problem with people being on the Supreme Court with no judicial experience. Many excellent justices have never served as judges. And honestly, sometimes I think it's good to get some outside perspectives in there.
SassyLady
05-11-2010, 11:12 AM
I don't have a problem with people being on the Supreme Court with no judicial experience. Many excellent justices have never served as judges. And honestly, sometimes I think it's good to get some outside perspectives in there.
I do - let the inexperienced sit on district courts - the Supreme Court is where the buck stops and I don't want someone "practicing law" at that level.
Perhaps this type of thought process is why Obama was elected .... "let's get someone in the Oval Office that has no leadership/management experience to give us some outside perspective about the Presidency."
Think it's ironic that we are just now starting to deal with international terrorism --- according to the inexperienced people with a different perspective in the WH.
AG Holder:
"We're now dealing with international terrorists, and I think that we have to think about perhaps modifying the rules that interrogators have and somehow coming up with something that is flexible and is more consistent with the threat that we now face."
Where have these people been for the last 15-20 years????
Abbey Marie
05-11-2010, 04:13 PM
I do - let the inexperienced sit on district courts - the Supreme Court is where the buck stops and I don't want someone "practicing law" at that level.
Perhaps this type of thought process is why Obama was elected .... "let's get someone in the Oval Office that has no leadership/management experience to give us some outside perspective about the Presidency."
Think it's ironic that we are just now starting to deal with international terrorism --- according to the inexperienced people with a different perspective in the WH.
AG Holder:
Where have these people been for the last 15-20 years????
http://www.quinnsquantumtechnologies.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/HeadInSand.jpg
cat slave
05-11-2010, 06:51 PM
So is that why you would support for her for the USSC? How about her experience in judging cases?
Oh, she NEVER served as a Judge
I think it is telling Obama - who had zero experience for his job - nominates someone who has zero experience for the Supreme Court
...and consider everything in judging a case but the
constitution! Just BOs level.
cat slave
05-11-2010, 06:53 PM
No experience, and no chance of being over-ruled. Whoopee- here we go! :rolleyes: :eek: :scared::bang3::poop::no: :uhoh:
:clap::slap::thumb:
red states rule
05-11-2010, 06:54 PM
...and consider everything in judging a case but the
constitution! Just BOs level.
Obama said a smuch. Forget the LAW, go with how you feel
A year after Mr. Obama made “empathy” one of his main criteria in picking his first Supreme Court justice, he is avoiding the word, which became radioactive, as he picks his second nominee. Instead, he says he wants someone with “a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/us/politics/26memo.html
“a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people.”
Say what? Kagan has a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily life of the American people??? This woman who spent her whole life as an academic or government hack! You have got to be kidding me!
I think we are being sold another decorated pig.
LiberalNation
05-12-2010, 02:09 PM
Forty Supreme Court justices have come to the court without any prior judicial experience, half of them serving during the 20th century. They've included some of the court's most distinguished alumni, as well as some political hacks.
Nothing new, she's qualified
HogTrash
05-12-2010, 02:29 PM
Well, my gaydar certainly went off. Anyone know if she's married, or even has ever dated a man? I did read that she is vehemently against "Don't ask, don't tell".
And before our homo-philic members ask me what difference it makes, I am curious, okay?You should be expecting a visit from the Villiage Marine very shortly, Abbey.
Your comment will most assuredly set off his gay bashing early warning alert system.
LiberalNation
05-12-2010, 05:08 PM
Kagan's friends step forward to squelch gay rumors
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100512/ts_ynews/ynews_ts2018
Worried that weeks of rumors were turning into a major distraction, the White House is finally pushing back on all the speculation about Elena Kagan's love life. She's not gay, one of the Supreme Court nominee's best friends tells Politico reporter Ben Smith.
Administration officials hope the testimonials of Sarah Walzer and other Kagan friends will quiet speculation about the nominee's sexual orientation fanned by blogger Andrew Sullivan. In March, blogger Ben Domenech raised the same issue, referring to Kagan as "openly gay" in a post later removed by CBS News' online commentary syndicate after protests from the White House over the "smear."
The speculation was clearly fueling wider public interest as well. Yahoo! statistics indicate that 15 percent of computer searches on Kagan focused on her personal life, with the majority of those targeting her sexual orientation and marital status. And on Google, phrases like "Elena Kagan gay" and "Elena Kagan personal life" were among the top trending searches.
red states rule
05-12-2010, 06:33 PM
Nothing new, she's qualified
Laura Ingraham took Meredith Vieira to school on Kagan. The libs is now telling us once again experience does not matter
Thanks to the left, we have Obama and we all know how well the hope and change is doing
<object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Xd6UqGQukU" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Xd6UqGQukU" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object>
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.