-Cp
04-06-2010, 02:35 PM
By Kameron Messmer
I know this is a dividing issue and I don't want it to be. Especially not with us. This is not to cause controversy or fights. These are my thoughts and ramblings. Have whatever opinion you have come to. This is just my way of getting my thoughts together.
I was pondering the Old Testament God vs. the New Testament Jesus the other day. The question is often brought up by those brave enough to think for themselves. Most Christians I run into have no problems reconciling the two, but as someone who has issues with violence I have to ask this question. I am not judging other Christians, it just always seemed like they had little to no issue with things from the Old Testament like God sanctioned war, or wiping out women and children, or plagues and famines. Even Modern day wars and capital punishment don’t raise an eyebrow. I think it is because they see the Old Testament God as the same as Jesus. I know that God is the same yesterday, today and forever, but oddly enough the actual quote is Jesus Christ is the same… but to recognize the hypothetical point it does say in Malachi 3:6 "For I am the LORD, I do not change”. We as Christians usually believe Christ is God, but we also believe that The Trinity is in Three Persons. At least that is how the hymn goes… My point is, if Jesus and the Father are different persons and they individually don’t change maybe everything fits together. The Father can be the loving yet sometimes vengeful God while Jesus is usually more loving and calm. Except for when the Pharisees piss him off…
Not to theorize too much, but what if God the Father is the one who has to be “the bad guy” sometimes? He is the father who has to punish humanity when it colors on the walls with markers. Maybe Jesus is the one to show the love and mercy. Kind of like parents. Sometimes my dad showed love, but often he was the one to show the discipline when I broke the exercise bike. I swear it was an accident. My mom on the other hand usually was not the disciplinarian. She would say things like, “You just wait till your father comes home!” but normally showed love and affection. I am not saying this is how it really is; I am really just spit balling. I am probably re constituting a heresy I don’t know the name of… I digress.
I have always heard that Jesus is the reflection of the Fathers’ heart. I was thinking of all the things God did in the Old Testament that doesn’t line up with Jesus’ Modus operandi. Jesus was forgiving to people who broke the Fathers rules. The ones They came up with. The very same rules in the very same scriptures were being broken and when the older children see it and tattle, Jesus says, “It’s ok. I forgive you”. There seems to be a disconnect. The rules are set, the Father enforces them with sometimes deadly consequences, and then Jesus comes and undoes everything. The Father commands His people to wipe out men, women, children and animals. Kill everything. Jesus comes and says, “Forgive your enemies”, “Turn the other cheek”, and “He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword”.
I’ve heard the theory that we don’t know God’s plan… well that’s not the theory. I know we don’t know God’s plan, but maybe from our little perspective we can’t see what the death of thousands is doing. God knows what He is doing, but back to the question, what on earth was Jesus doing? Jesus turns God and His rules on their ear. God is known to be vengeful, wrathful, and all around guy you don’t want to piss off. Jesus is forgiving, loving, and peaceful.
Then something popped in my head.
Back in Old Testament, the original “Back in the day”, The Jews were the chosen people. Any way you slice it, God was playing favorites. Not to say there was not grace for gentiles, but it seems He had a little pet nation. We are all children of Adam, and children of God, but maybe back in the “day” things worked differently. The gentiles weren’t “His people” and maybe they were probably a great danger to them at the time, so God said to wipe them out. I am not a scholar, and haven’t studied this intensely so don’t write me and point out where God had the Jews travel out of their way to wipe out a city. Again, spit balling.
So if God wasn’t so picky on who died and how, why the change? Why would Jesus change the rules mid-game? Then I thought “Jesus changed the rules because of Jesus!”
Follow me here, maybe the Jews were the chosen people and God’s instrument to kill any one God said to. Why did it matter? God’s world, God’s people, God’s choice. Seems strict, but I don’t have a vote. Then when Jesus died, He gave everyone the chance to be the chosen people. We are all God’s people again. So instead of being “in” or “out” with God, we are all “in”. Jesus is the person who let us in the family. God doesn’t kill like that anymore because we are all His children.
Then I come to the book of Revelation, where Jesus comes back and kicks some ass. Violence, Blood up to the bridles etc. What happened to the prince of Peace? He is only calm for a little while? Is He still pissed about the crucifixion thing? He seemed pretty forgiving when He was up there. Something doesn’t add up. Maybe the preterists are right and Revelation has already happened. Maybe we really don’t understand what Revelations is about, that’s a stretch, right? Revelations? Confusing? Nah!
So which God do we choose? Killy Mcgee? Or the “Prince of Peace”?
Mark Driscoll was quoted as saying “In Revelation, Jesus is a prize-fighter with a tattoo down His leg, a sword in His hand and the commitment to make someone bleed. That is the guy I can worship. I cannot worship the hippie, diaper, halo Christ because I cannot worship a guy I can beat up.”
I disagree with the image Christians like Driscoll paint Jesus as. I don’t think He was a hippy, or weak, or a doormat. I am not advocating a passive Jesus or being passive. Jesus flipped tables, cursed people out, gave mobs the slip, and outsmarted scholars at their own game, but also was gentle, meek, mild, forgiving, grace filled and loving. I am not saying Jesus is “a limp-wrist hippie in a dress with a lot of product in His hair, who drank decaf and made pithy Zen statements about life while shopping for the perfect pair of shoes.” to complete the Driscoll quote. I am saying He taught peace, love and forgiveness, not force, violence and coercion.
The arguments from some Christians concerning pacifism usually have something to do with someone raping and murdering your family while you go get him a coffee. Or they bring up the verse where Jesus asks “Do we have any swords?” Ironically after that verse Jesus is arrested and Peter cuts off the servant’s ear. Maybe Jesus knew Peter would do this so Jesus could show compassion and mercy even to His attackers. Maybe he set peter up. Maybe He wanted Peter to cut off the guy’s ear to show what you are to do to enemies…Love them.
Even the moment where Jesus could show His right handed power, He lets them take him and kill Him forgiving all the way.
Don’t get me wrong, I understand why some people can’t get on the pacifism bandwagon. Maybe bandwagon is the wrong term. Anyways, I can see why a man would rip an attackers head off if their family was involved. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same. I should hope I would find a more creative way than breaking their neck or shooting them. I often come up with creative ways to handle a hypothetical situation sans violence. I remember one time I walked my wife, then girl friend home. A drunk man started walking towards her as I was walking away. When I realized he was walking towards her I ran. I ran like hell towards her. I had no idea what I would do when I got there, but he saw this crazy guy with dreads running towards him. He stumbled off.
Again, I can’t say what I would do in any situation. I believe I have grace for whatever may happen, but that is not to say I want to live in a mindset of violence being the answer. I don’t want to live by the sword, even in my head. This is an issue I struggle with all the time in a world where violence is the answer. I know these words don’t have answers, but a rambling of questions and thoughts. ..Take what you will…
Personally, I can’t seem to wrap my head around Christians who think Jesus would condone violence when He lived a life of peace. Again I don’t think Jesus lived a wimpy doormat life, but a life that begged for you to live with Him. Verses a life that forced you to obey. But then again maybe Jesus is coming back like Driscoll said. Jesus is coming. And He wants to kick your ass…
I know this is a dividing issue and I don't want it to be. Especially not with us. This is not to cause controversy or fights. These are my thoughts and ramblings. Have whatever opinion you have come to. This is just my way of getting my thoughts together.
I was pondering the Old Testament God vs. the New Testament Jesus the other day. The question is often brought up by those brave enough to think for themselves. Most Christians I run into have no problems reconciling the two, but as someone who has issues with violence I have to ask this question. I am not judging other Christians, it just always seemed like they had little to no issue with things from the Old Testament like God sanctioned war, or wiping out women and children, or plagues and famines. Even Modern day wars and capital punishment don’t raise an eyebrow. I think it is because they see the Old Testament God as the same as Jesus. I know that God is the same yesterday, today and forever, but oddly enough the actual quote is Jesus Christ is the same… but to recognize the hypothetical point it does say in Malachi 3:6 "For I am the LORD, I do not change”. We as Christians usually believe Christ is God, but we also believe that The Trinity is in Three Persons. At least that is how the hymn goes… My point is, if Jesus and the Father are different persons and they individually don’t change maybe everything fits together. The Father can be the loving yet sometimes vengeful God while Jesus is usually more loving and calm. Except for when the Pharisees piss him off…
Not to theorize too much, but what if God the Father is the one who has to be “the bad guy” sometimes? He is the father who has to punish humanity when it colors on the walls with markers. Maybe Jesus is the one to show the love and mercy. Kind of like parents. Sometimes my dad showed love, but often he was the one to show the discipline when I broke the exercise bike. I swear it was an accident. My mom on the other hand usually was not the disciplinarian. She would say things like, “You just wait till your father comes home!” but normally showed love and affection. I am not saying this is how it really is; I am really just spit balling. I am probably re constituting a heresy I don’t know the name of… I digress.
I have always heard that Jesus is the reflection of the Fathers’ heart. I was thinking of all the things God did in the Old Testament that doesn’t line up with Jesus’ Modus operandi. Jesus was forgiving to people who broke the Fathers rules. The ones They came up with. The very same rules in the very same scriptures were being broken and when the older children see it and tattle, Jesus says, “It’s ok. I forgive you”. There seems to be a disconnect. The rules are set, the Father enforces them with sometimes deadly consequences, and then Jesus comes and undoes everything. The Father commands His people to wipe out men, women, children and animals. Kill everything. Jesus comes and says, “Forgive your enemies”, “Turn the other cheek”, and “He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword”.
I’ve heard the theory that we don’t know God’s plan… well that’s not the theory. I know we don’t know God’s plan, but maybe from our little perspective we can’t see what the death of thousands is doing. God knows what He is doing, but back to the question, what on earth was Jesus doing? Jesus turns God and His rules on their ear. God is known to be vengeful, wrathful, and all around guy you don’t want to piss off. Jesus is forgiving, loving, and peaceful.
Then something popped in my head.
Back in Old Testament, the original “Back in the day”, The Jews were the chosen people. Any way you slice it, God was playing favorites. Not to say there was not grace for gentiles, but it seems He had a little pet nation. We are all children of Adam, and children of God, but maybe back in the “day” things worked differently. The gentiles weren’t “His people” and maybe they were probably a great danger to them at the time, so God said to wipe them out. I am not a scholar, and haven’t studied this intensely so don’t write me and point out where God had the Jews travel out of their way to wipe out a city. Again, spit balling.
So if God wasn’t so picky on who died and how, why the change? Why would Jesus change the rules mid-game? Then I thought “Jesus changed the rules because of Jesus!”
Follow me here, maybe the Jews were the chosen people and God’s instrument to kill any one God said to. Why did it matter? God’s world, God’s people, God’s choice. Seems strict, but I don’t have a vote. Then when Jesus died, He gave everyone the chance to be the chosen people. We are all God’s people again. So instead of being “in” or “out” with God, we are all “in”. Jesus is the person who let us in the family. God doesn’t kill like that anymore because we are all His children.
Then I come to the book of Revelation, where Jesus comes back and kicks some ass. Violence, Blood up to the bridles etc. What happened to the prince of Peace? He is only calm for a little while? Is He still pissed about the crucifixion thing? He seemed pretty forgiving when He was up there. Something doesn’t add up. Maybe the preterists are right and Revelation has already happened. Maybe we really don’t understand what Revelations is about, that’s a stretch, right? Revelations? Confusing? Nah!
So which God do we choose? Killy Mcgee? Or the “Prince of Peace”?
Mark Driscoll was quoted as saying “In Revelation, Jesus is a prize-fighter with a tattoo down His leg, a sword in His hand and the commitment to make someone bleed. That is the guy I can worship. I cannot worship the hippie, diaper, halo Christ because I cannot worship a guy I can beat up.”
I disagree with the image Christians like Driscoll paint Jesus as. I don’t think He was a hippy, or weak, or a doormat. I am not advocating a passive Jesus or being passive. Jesus flipped tables, cursed people out, gave mobs the slip, and outsmarted scholars at their own game, but also was gentle, meek, mild, forgiving, grace filled and loving. I am not saying Jesus is “a limp-wrist hippie in a dress with a lot of product in His hair, who drank decaf and made pithy Zen statements about life while shopping for the perfect pair of shoes.” to complete the Driscoll quote. I am saying He taught peace, love and forgiveness, not force, violence and coercion.
The arguments from some Christians concerning pacifism usually have something to do with someone raping and murdering your family while you go get him a coffee. Or they bring up the verse where Jesus asks “Do we have any swords?” Ironically after that verse Jesus is arrested and Peter cuts off the servant’s ear. Maybe Jesus knew Peter would do this so Jesus could show compassion and mercy even to His attackers. Maybe he set peter up. Maybe He wanted Peter to cut off the guy’s ear to show what you are to do to enemies…Love them.
Even the moment where Jesus could show His right handed power, He lets them take him and kill Him forgiving all the way.
Don’t get me wrong, I understand why some people can’t get on the pacifism bandwagon. Maybe bandwagon is the wrong term. Anyways, I can see why a man would rip an attackers head off if their family was involved. I can’t say I wouldn’t do the same. I should hope I would find a more creative way than breaking their neck or shooting them. I often come up with creative ways to handle a hypothetical situation sans violence. I remember one time I walked my wife, then girl friend home. A drunk man started walking towards her as I was walking away. When I realized he was walking towards her I ran. I ran like hell towards her. I had no idea what I would do when I got there, but he saw this crazy guy with dreads running towards him. He stumbled off.
Again, I can’t say what I would do in any situation. I believe I have grace for whatever may happen, but that is not to say I want to live in a mindset of violence being the answer. I don’t want to live by the sword, even in my head. This is an issue I struggle with all the time in a world where violence is the answer. I know these words don’t have answers, but a rambling of questions and thoughts. ..Take what you will…
Personally, I can’t seem to wrap my head around Christians who think Jesus would condone violence when He lived a life of peace. Again I don’t think Jesus lived a wimpy doormat life, but a life that begged for you to live with Him. Verses a life that forced you to obey. But then again maybe Jesus is coming back like Driscoll said. Jesus is coming. And He wants to kick your ass…