chesswarsnow
10-08-2009, 09:37 PM
Sorry bout that,
1. Who you going to replace him with is the question.
2. What up standing political figure is better than Rangel?
3. Yeah, trick question, there is none.
4. Rangel isn't going anywhere folks.
5. Link and a sample:http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/08/house-ethics-panel-expand-rangel-probe/
"The House panel investigating alleged ethics violations by Rep. Charles B. Rangel, New York Democrat, said Thursday it voted unanimously to expand the probe.
A statement by the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct said its investigative subcommittee already has issued nearly "150 subpoenas, interviewed approximately 34 witnesses resulting in over 2,100 pages of transcripts."
6. Who else will be next to line their pockets with kick backs, leveraging, hush money, slush funds, etc.
7. Lets just keep the corrupted bastard we got now folks, Rangel stays.
8. Nothing to see here folks, move along,...hehehehe,......
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
1. Who you going to replace him with is the question.
2. What up standing political figure is better than Rangel?
3. Yeah, trick question, there is none.
4. Rangel isn't going anywhere folks.
5. Link and a sample:http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/08/house-ethics-panel-expand-rangel-probe/
"The House panel investigating alleged ethics violations by Rep. Charles B. Rangel, New York Democrat, said Thursday it voted unanimously to expand the probe.
A statement by the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct said its investigative subcommittee already has issued nearly "150 subpoenas, interviewed approximately 34 witnesses resulting in over 2,100 pages of transcripts."
6. Who else will be next to line their pockets with kick backs, leveraging, hush money, slush funds, etc.
7. Lets just keep the corrupted bastard we got now folks, Rangel stays.
8. Nothing to see here folks, move along,...hehehehe,......
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas