PDA

View Full Version : 87% of Employers to Reduce Benefits if Obamcare Increases Costs



red states rule
09-17-2009, 10:31 PM
Another update on how the Hope and Change Express is being being received by the private sector



Employers Put Costs at the Top of Health Care Reform Priority List, According to Towers Perrin Survey
Employers Say They Will Not Absorb Any Additional Costs Resulting From Reform

STAMFORD, Conn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--With health care reform efforts ramping up after the summer break, many of the nation’s employers are focusing on the action in Congress and plan to adjust their benefit strategies based on how final legislation affects their costs, according to a survey of 433 HR and benefit executives from midsize and large organizations conducted by professional services firm Towers Perrin. Employers say they will not absorb any additional costs that result from reform and plan to take actions to avoid doing so, including reducing benefits, raising prices for customers and/or reducing head count.

Although not as outspoken in the reform process as many stakeholders in the health care industry, employers are watching Washington closely, with 80% monitoring developments. Nearly one in four companies (23%) in the survey are currently rethinking benefit changes in light of possible reforms, and nearly all (89%) plan to reexamine their health benefit strategies for active employees in response to the passage of health care reform legislation. And while talent management considerations such as productivity, workforce health, and recruiting and retention remain important even in a tough economy, cost issues will dominate employers’ decision making in a post-reform world, according to the survey.

“With employer health care costs rising more than 150% over the last decade, it’s no surprise that 90% of employers list cost containment as the most important health care reform goal,” said Dave Guilmette, Managing Director of the Towers Perrin Health and Welfare practice. “ Many large employers, however, feel that current reform proposals are focused on other health care issues — such as expanding coverage and reforming certain insurance practices — and they feel they have already addressed these issues within their own workforces.”

In addition, employers do not expect that reform as currently proposed will address some of the fundamental drivers of health care costs. For example, nearly two-thirds of employers (65%) believe that health care reform will have little or no impact on consumer behaviors, an area many leading employers have begun to target as one of their key cost-containment opportunities.

Nevertheless, among health care proposals currently on the table, 53% of employers believe that research on effectiveness of alternative treatments will have a positive impact on their business by, over time, influencing the quality of care, and 44% believe that reforming the health insurance market to ensure guaranteed access to coverage regardless of health status will have a positive impact. However, nearly half (47%) of survey respondents believe that an employer “pay or play” mandate would have a negative impact on businesses

http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20090917005143&newsLang=en

cat slave
09-20-2009, 07:18 AM
The element of "universal" care has long been addressed by the UAW when
bargaining with Ford and I guess all three of the previously American held
auto makers.

They have been holding their breath for years waiting for the universal plan
that will full fill their promised obligations to their retirees. They have been
planning for years to have the government take over health care. Guess
they havent thought about the loss of sales due to retirees and srs having
to pay a lot of money for health care.....a new vehicle will not even be on
the list. Guess they plan on selling their wares to the third world wage
earner. LOL...jokes on them.:lol:

red states rule
09-20-2009, 07:21 AM
The element of "universal" care has long been addressed by the UAW when
bargaining with Ford and I guess all three of the previously American held
auto makers.

They have been holding their breath for years waiting for the universal plan
that will full fill their promised obligations to their retirees. They have been
planning for years to have the government take over health care. Guess
they havent thought about the loss of sales due to retirees and srs having
to pay a lot of money for health care.....a new vehicle will not even be on
the list. Guess they plan on selling their wares to the third world wage
earner. LOL...jokes on them.:lol:

IF the real intent of Dems were to lower the cost of health care ins - all they have to do is allow people to buy policies from companies in other states

Let someone in CA buy a policy from a company in Maryland. The cost would be much lower and give people more choices

cat slave
09-20-2009, 10:04 AM
Yes, it would. Good old competition for the consumers dollar, or pennies after
all the "change" the messiah has in store for us.

red states rule
09-20-2009, 10:05 AM
Yes, it would. Good old competition for the consumers dollar, or pennies after
all the "change" the messiah has in store for us.

Competition is the answer

Government will, and always does, make the situation worse