Van Jones: Only ‘Suburban White Kids’ Shoot Up Schools

[red states rule]

Van Jones continues to show us just how racist and ignorant he is

Yet Obama is his friend and wanted him as part of his administration



<object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Gd8z8zaG2G" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Gd8z8zaG2G" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object>

[red states rule]

Seems Obama did know about Van Jones' background and his kook left comments

Also, the far left is upset over Obama tossing him over the side

It is fun watching the Obama administration and the left implode


Progressives decry resignation of Van Jones
Joe Garofoli, Chronicle Staff Writer

Monday, September 7, 2009



The middle-of-the-night resignation Sunday of longtime Bay Area activist Van Jones as a White House environmental adviser left many progressives angry at the Obama administration for buckling to conservative criticism of Jones' controversial past comments and actions.

The administration is losing not only one of the nation's leading environmentalists, progressives say, but one of the few liberal voices with President Obama's ear.

Jones resigned amid a furor over his signature on a 2004 petition questioning the government's actions around the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Supporters say the administration surely knew his background when they appointed Jones, the first African American to write a best-selling environmental book, as special adviser for green jobs at the White House Council on Environmental Quality. In fact, agents interviewed at least one of his former supervisors in San Francisco - Eva Paterson - when the FBI vetted his appointment.

This year, Time magazine named Jones one of the 100 most influential people in the world. Former Vice President Al Gore is a fan, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said his best-selling book, "Green Collar," showcased his "sparkling intelligence, powerful vision and deep empathy."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/07/MNT319JJCF.DTL

[theHawk]

Its "only" white kids eh? Virgina Tech ??


I guess this moron doesn't even realize that the "white kids" that did Columbine were radical Darwinists. You know, that ideology that liberals love so much.

[red states rule]

Its "only" white kids eh? Virgina Tech ??


I guess this moron doesn't even realize that the "white kids" that did Columbine were radical Darwinists. You know, that ideology that liberals love so much.

I guess he's never heard of the "Crips" and the "Bloods" and all the other black gangs that kill each other in the streets every day.

and that Van Jones threw his support behind cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal in 1999.

Yet he is one of the "best and brightest" Obama picked to work in his administration - and he was forced out by the right wing media the libs will whine

All of this is public record yet we are not to bring it up, or we are racists and want to tear down the Obama administration

[red states rule]

Now we have this gem


September 7, 2009
Van Jones Did Not Fill Out WH Questionnaire

Van Jones, the Obama green jobs czar who resigned shortly after midnight Sunday, did not fill out the exhaustive questionnaire White House officials required of every Cabinet-level secretary and deputy-secretary position.

An administration official said special advisers to the president, or czars, are not required to fill out the questionnaire that runs 7 pages and contains 63 questions.

The entire questionnaire, the official said, is reserved for appointees who must win Senate confirmation.

Among the varied topics covered in the questionnaire: history as a lobbyist or other "legislative agent", tax liens, bankruptcies, spousal employment, potential conflicts of interest, domestic help, internet "handles" and Facebook pages, and traffic fines in excess of $50.

Question 61 reads as follows: "Have you had any association with any person, group or business venture that could be used - even unfairly - to impugn or attack your character and qualifications for government service?"

That question might have raised a flag since Jones signed a 2004 petition calling for an investigation into potential government complicity in the 9/11 attrocities that left nearly 3,000 civilians dead in coordinated hijacked airplane attacks in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania.

The petition was collected by 911Truth.org. It can be read here:

Before resigning, Jones issued a statement approved by the Council for Environmental Quality, that said he "did not agree" with the 9/11Truth.org statement and that it did not reflect his views "now or ever."

However, Fox News correspondent James Rosen spoke with 911Truth.org spokesman Mike Berger on Friday and Berger said Jones knew what the petition said and agreed with its contents.

"He did agree with that statement and he did sign on to it," Berger said in a phone interview with Rosen. Berger said the group's "original board members individually confirmed all signatories that had signed on to the statement." Asked by what means the confirmation was obtained, Berger said: "They did it through email or on the phone."

An administration official said Jones never hid his controversial associations or remarks from the White House.

"It wouldn't be fair to characterize him as being dishonest or hiding his comments or his positions," the official said. "It's just fair to say that he didn't go through the most rigorous vetting process."

http://whitehouse.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/09/07/van-jones-did-not-fill-out-wh-questionnaire/

[avatar4321]

Of course he didnt fill it out. He isnt filling a cabinet position.

[REDWHITEBLUE2]

Either obama is the stupidest person on earth OR he is the worlds slickest Liar?
Rev wright / bill ayers / prof gates/ eric holder/ van jones ALL Racist thugs
but according to obama he never knew any of them were Radical Racists

[red states rule]

Of course he didnt fill it out. He isnt filling a cabinet position.

Otherwise he would have to go thru confirmation and all of his wack job comment would have come out in the open

But it does show once again Obama's judgement when it comes to who he picks to work in his administration

[red states rule]

Now the left is playing the race card and is a "national hero"

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xKoXGwNPonU&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xKoXGwNPonU&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[Jeff]

This guy ought to take a tour of any HS in Harlem, LOL

[avatar4321]

All he wanted was social justice. it's all he wanted! And because he's black he had to resign.

Who the hell cares about his race? This is pathetic. The left has lost all attempts to be honest about this.

[red states rule]

This guy ought to take a tour of any HS in Harlem, LOL

Great place to find more "victims" to put in front of the TV cameras

[actsnoblemartin]

since when was the left honest?


All he wanted was social justice. it's all he wanted! And because he's black he had to resign.

Who the hell cares about his race? This is pathetic. The left has lost all attempts to be honest about this.

[red states rule]

More spin from the loyal lefties in the liberal media

<object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Gd8zkU8znz" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Gd8zkU8znz" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object>

[actsnoblemartin]

the left spins more then a dreidel

[namvet]

uh oh there goes my give a rats ass meter. going down :laugh2:

[Noir]

And he's right...after all, da niggaz don't go ta school cus dey is too busy pimpin hoes and gettin drugs for der broz, so they don't get the chance to shoot a school up.


On another note I heard a bril joke the other day by Frankie Boyle
"Did any of you guys see Obamas last speech? And how there was bullet-proof glass seperating him from the crowd? I think that just goes to show just how racist America still is, I mean, just because he's black dosnt mean he's gonna shoot anybody!"

:p

[red states rule]

And he's right...after all, da niggaz don't go ta school cus dey is too busy pimpin hoes and gettin drugs for der broz, so they don't get the chance to shoot a school up.


On another note I heard a bril joke the other day by Frankie Boyle
"Did any of you guys see Obamas last speech? And how there was bullet-proof glass seperating him from the crowd? I think that just goes to show just how racist America still is, I mean, just because he's black dosnt mean he's gonna shoot anybody!"

:p

another liberal playing the race card in the face of facts

What a shocker

[Noir]

another liberal playing the race card in the face of facts

What a shocker

*FacePlam*
You do realize I was talking the piss out of liberals in my post ya?

[theHawk]

More spin from the loyal lefties in the liberal media

<object width="518" height="419"><param name="movie" value="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Gd8zkU8znz" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/eyeblast.swf?v=Gd8zkU8znz" allowfullscreen="true" width="518" height="419" /></object>

Someone out to tell that bitch that even if she doesn't care about how many Czars there are and what the vetting process is, many people do care about the characters being appointed into high positions of power.

It sounds like her whole point was that we should all just trust Obama because everyone he appoints is smart, and they're doing good! Yea right :poke:

[red states rule]

Someone out to tell that bitch that even if she doesn't care about how many Czars there are and what the vetting process is, many people do care about the characters being appointed into high positions of power.

It sounds like her whole point was that we should all just trust Obama because everyone he appoints is smart, and they're doing good! Yea right :poke:

It is a matter of lack of trust with the people and bias with the media

snip

Early in the Obama administration, the Times did not tell its readers about a controversy raging over the proposed choice of Charles Freeman to head the National Intelligence Council. Some conservatives opposed Freeman for his ties to the Saudi government, as well as things he had said about Israel. The Times ignored the story for weeks until it was over, publishing a report only after Freeman withdrew his name from consideration.

Then, of course, there was the case of John Edwards, the former 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee and 2008 presidential candidate. Despite mounting evidence, the Times did not report Edwards' affair with a woman he hired to produce campaign videos until after Edwards himself publicly admitted it.

Wright. Jones. Freeman. Edwards. For simplicity's sake, I've focused on the Times' coverage, but other top news outlets also ignored or underreported some of those stories. Why?

Certainly there's bias involved. Given what we know from the formal and informal polling of journalists at mainstream organizations, most of the people involved in political reporting are liberals, and likely Democrats. They want the Obama administration to succeed.

But the question may not be so much who they are, as who they hate, or at least who they intensely dislike.

The first words of the Times' story on Jones' resignation were, "In a victory for Republicans and the Obama administration's conservative critics. ..." One news anchor suggested Jones was "the Republican right's first scalp." Other coverage called the Jones affair a victory for Glenn Beck, Fox News, right-wing blogs, and even Sarah Palin, who played no role in the matter.

If you throw in Rush Limbaugh, you have all the bogey-people of the conservative world. To some on the left, including some journalists, denying them a victory was a top priority, no matter what Van Jones had said and done.

There was a day, not too long ago, when the Times and other influential news organizations could kill a story -- could deny the bad guys a win -- simply by ignoring it. Sometimes they still try. But it just won't work anymore.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Why-did-the-press-ignore-the-Van-Jones-scandal_-8210602-57658222.html