U.S. regulatory czar nominee wants Net 'Fairness Doctrine'

[red states rule]

Apparently when Obama said "Yes we can.", "we" didn't include the citizens.


http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u68/bamahead/burning_constituition.jpg

[Monkeybone]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96301 (yah i know it is WND, i was bored and surfing...)

Excuse me? how about no? trying to regulate what we can say now?


Barack Obama's nominee for "regulatory czar" has advocated a "Fairness Doctrine" for the Internet that would require opposing opinions be linked this is semi-understandable. should always let the other stance have a say blah bla blah, even when a five year old could search and find it in 30 seconds or less. because you know when someone says something, absolutely no one will give a different viewpoint of it haha.

this is the part that gets me.
also has suggested angry e-mails should be prevented from being sent by technology that would require a 24-hour cooling off period. so...it was bad to check for e-mails that might be linked to terrorism...but it's ok to now stop every e-mail because they might be "angry" and "anti-demorcratic"? ridiculous

[avatar4321]

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. How freaking difficult is it to find an opposing point of view? Is there honestly a subject online that no one disagrees with? I mean come on!

[5stringJeff]

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=opposing+view