PDA

View Full Version : Military strained by Obama trip



Kathianne
04-03-2009, 07:54 AM
Not good, if this reporting is correct. Since the WH wouldn't comment, rings true:


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/02/inside-the-ring-89874599/



Thursday, April 2, 2009
Military strained by Obama trip
Bill Gertz INSIDE THE RING (Contact)

Air Obama
President Obama's European visit this week has strained Air Force heavy-airlift capabilities and obliged the military to hire more foreign contractors to help resupply U.S. and allied forces in Afghanistan, according to military sources.

The large delegation traveling with the president in Europe required moving several transports, including jumbo C-5s and C-17s, from sorties ferrying supplies to Afghanistan to European bases for the presidential visit, said two military officials familiar with the issue. They spoke on the condition of anonymity to avoid any misunderstanding with White House officials.

The Air Mobility Command, part of the U.S. Transportation Command, was ordered to provide airlift for the president's entourage of nearly 500 people, including senior officials, staff, support personnel, news reporters and some 200 Secret Service agents for the European visit, which began Tuesday in London.

Airlift for the traveling entourage also was used to move the president's new heavy-armored limousine and several presidential helicopters used for short transits....

...To make up for the shortfall, the Air Force had to increase the number of Eastern European air transport contractors hired to fly Il-76 and An-124 transport jets into Afghanistan loaded with troop supplies, the two officials said.

The airlift crunch comes at a particularly difficult time, as the military is stepping up deliveries of supplies in advance of a surge of 21,000 U.S. troops.

One official said the problem was not only the vehicles and helicopters that were needed for presidential security, but also the unusually large number of people traveling with the president. The official said U.S. taxpayers are paying twice for airlift, once for Air Force jets that are not available for a war zone and again for foreign contractor aircraft that are....

Sitarro
04-03-2009, 12:44 PM
I guess this is the change this dipshit talked about. Really, 500 staff members? 200 Secret service agents? This clown is more expensive by the day. Then again, he spent 715 million dollars to beat a crippled 72 year old and his polarizing partner, why should we be surprised that this jerk and his wife would spend like there was no tomorrow now that they moved on up, to the White House?

Can you imagine how much Hillary is spending?

PostmodernProphet
04-03-2009, 03:01 PM
Obama aside, why don't we have enough transports to fly our own troops supplies.....this article says we "increased" our use of foriegn tranports......unless this is simply what our allies are doing to help?......but the article makes it sound like we "hired" civilian transport.....

Mr. P
04-03-2009, 04:11 PM
Cu.this article says we "increased" our use of foriegn tranports......unless this is simply what our allies are doing to help?......but the article makes it sound like we "hired" civilian transport.....

Cuz it's not cost effective to have say 1000 aircraft sitting around you may use every 10 yrs.

Jagger
04-03-2009, 05:02 PM
It's George Bush's illegal war in Iraq that has strained the military.

Mr. P
04-03-2009, 06:13 PM
It's George Bush's illegal war in Iraq that has strained the military.

We used contract aviation sources during Vietnam too..Damn that bush.

Jagger
04-04-2009, 07:21 PM
The U. S. Military is a Socialist Institution.

theHawk
04-04-2009, 08:37 PM
The U. S. Military is a Socialist Institution.

I guess that makes me a socialist. :tinfoil:

Kathianne
04-04-2009, 08:38 PM
I guess that makes me a socialist. :tinfoil:

Somehow I doubt that.