PDA

View Full Version : Bailout recipients keep donating



red states rule
02-10-2009, 07:38 AM
Are Dems going to condem this spending by corporations getting taxpayer money?


EXCLUSIVE: Bailout recipients keep donating

Jennifer Haberkorn
Tuesday, February 10, 2009


Wall Street executives have pleaded economic ruin, secured hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer assistance and been pilloried for their business excesses. But none of that has curbed their appetite for doling out political donations - or the willingness of politicians to accept the largesse.

A Washington Times analysis found that executives and employee-funded political action committees of banking companies that received bailout money have donated more than $2 million to members of Congress and other politicians since lawmakers approved the federal rescue of America's financial system in October.

The PACs linked to the top 20 recipients of federal rescue funds have spent a combined $1.5 million on donations since Congress approved the bailout while employees of the top 10 recipients of bailout money have donated an additional $726,070, Federal Election Commission records showed.

The financial industry has long been a dominant political giver. For instance, executives of the top 10 bailout recipients gave $1.2 million in donations during the same period in 2004.

But their continued largesse since the bailout is a stark reminder that its executives still intend to play expensive politics even in the midst of a belt-tightening recession, analysts said.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/10/bailout-recipients-keep-donating-to-politicians/

DannyR
02-10-2009, 11:43 AM
Are Dems going to condem this spending by corporations getting taxpayer money?I'll condemn it. Bailout money is to be used only for keeping the company afloat!

Unfortunately this touches on a much larger problem of political giving. By law, its not really the corporations receiving bailouts that are donating, but individuals doing so on their own, or via PACs in their name.

You are opening up a much larger can of worms if you are going to start dictating where individuals can freely give their own (sic) money.

red states rule
02-10-2009, 11:46 AM
I'll condemn it. Bailout money is to be used only for keeping the company afloat!

Unfortunately this touches on a much larger problem of political giving. By law, its not really the corporations receiving bailouts that are donating, but individuals doing so on their own, or via PACs in their name.

You are opening up a much larger can of worms if you are going to start dictating where individuals can freely give their own (sic) money.

Seems if a company wants it name on a stadium for marketing purposes ,or reward hard working employees with a free trip, that is forbidden

But if they want to line the pockets of politicans - well send in the check

What would reaaly make things smiple is NO BAILOUT FOR ANYONE OR FOR ANY COMPANY

Then that would mean Dems would not have their hand in the company and make decisions for them

DannyR
02-10-2009, 11:58 AM
Then that would mean Dems would not have their hand in the company and make decisions for themI've not yet seen any CEO's turning down the money. Seems they don't mind giving up a bit of freedom to pad their financial security.

red states rule
02-10-2009, 12:00 PM
I've not yet seen any CEO's turning down the money. Seems they don't mind giving up a bit of freedom to pad their financial security.

If the objective is to save the company, why would anyone want people like Reid, Pelosi, or Obama telling them how to run the company?

There are several who said paying the money back is the top objective - so they can get the government out of the picture