PDA

View Full Version : Last-minute Bush abortion ruling causes furor



crin63
11-19-2008, 12:03 AM
I hope we see more goodbyes like this one as President Bush leaves office.


Last-minute Bush abortion ruling causes furor
By Robert Pear
Published: November 18, 2008

WASHINGTON: A last-minute Bush administration plan to grant sweeping new protections to health care providers who oppose abortion and other procedures on religious or moral grounds has provoked a torrent of objections, including a strenuous protest from the government agency that enforces job-discrimination laws.

The proposed rule would prohibit recipients of federal money from discriminating against doctors, nurses and other health care workers who refuse to perform or to assist in the performance of abortions or sterilization procedures because of their "religious beliefs or moral convictions."

It would also prevent hospitals, clinics, doctors' offices and drugstores from requiring employees with religious or moral objections to "assist in the performance of any part of a health service program or research activity" financed by the Department of Health and Human Services.

But three officials from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, including its legal counsel, whom President George W. Bush appointed, said the proposal would overturn 40 years of civil rights law prohibiting job discrimination based on religion.

The counsel, Reed Russell, and two Democratic members of the commission, Stuart Ishimaru and Christine Griffin, also said that the rule was unnecessary for the protection of employees and potentially confusing to employers.
Today in Americas
Economic crisis hits new veterans hard
Obama promises action on climate change
Bark beetles kill millions of acres of trees in the American West

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 already prohibits employment discrimination based on religion, Russell said, and the courts have defined "religion" broadly to include "moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong, which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views."

Ishimaru and senior members of the commission staff said that neither the Department of Health and Human Services nor the White House had consulted their agency before issuing the proposed rule. The White House Office of Management and Budget received the proposal Aug. 21 and cleared it the same day, according to a government Web site that keeps track of the rule-making process.

The protest from the commission comes on the heels of other objections to the rule by doctors, pharmacists, hospitals, state attorneys general and political leaders, including President-elect Barack Obama.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/11/18/america/abort.php

Yurt
11-19-2008, 12:11 AM
is this something obama could overturn?

Mr. P
11-19-2008, 12:15 AM
is this something obama could overturn?

Overturn? It'll never pass.

Yurt
11-19-2008, 12:19 AM
Overturn? It'll never pass.

assuming it did

bullypulpit
11-19-2008, 05:20 AM
Any rules the Bush administration promulgates in the last six months of office are subject to review by Congress and rescinded if appropriate. Executive orders can be rescinded by Obama once he takes office.

Oh, and crin63, hasn't the Bush administration left enough flaming bags of dog-shit on America's porch? And you want more?

Immanuel
11-19-2008, 08:37 AM
But three officials from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, including its legal counsel, whom President George W. Bush appointed, said the proposal would overturn 40 years of civil rights law prohibiting job discrimination based on religion.

Hmmm, hello idiots, it prohibits job discrimination. I wonder if these three elected officials know what the term prohibit means. On what grounds do these three idiots support discrimination against medical professionals who believe that abortion is wrong?

Immie

crin63
11-19-2008, 09:58 AM
It has the potential to stand because its a clarification of an existing law not the creation of a new law. The SCOTUS ruled against Truman in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer because they said Truman was making a new law not clarifying an existing law.


Until the 1950s, there were no rules or guidelines outlining what the president could or could not do through an executive order. However, the Supreme Court ruled in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952) that Executive Order 10340 from President Harry S. Truman placing all steel mills in the country under federal control was invalid because it attempted to make law, rather than clarify or act to further a law put forth by the Congress or the Constitution. Presidents since this decision have generally been careful to cite which specific laws they are acting under when issuing new executive orders.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order_(United_States)

If I remember right Clinton stuck it to us on the way out the door with executive order against drilling in ANWR.