PDA

View Full Version : Frank Calls for Major Defense Cuts, 'Eventual' Tax Hike



stephanie
10-24-2008, 11:14 AM
vote yourself some higher taxes...VOTE Democrat:dance:

@ 10:21 am by Hill Staff
Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) said Democrats will push for a stimulus package after the November election, and called for a package reducing defense spending by 25 percent while saying Congress will "eventually" raise taxes.

Frank told the editorial board of the SouthCoast Standard-Times that he wanted to reduce defense spending by a quarter, meaning the United States would have to withdraw from Iraq sooner.

"The people of Iraq want us out, and we want to stay over their objection," he said. "It's extraordinary."

Frank also said the post-election stimulus package will focus on spending for building projects, extending unemployment benefits, and further supporting states' healthcare costs. "We'll have to raise taxes ultimately," Frank said. "Not now, but eventually." Frank told the Standard-Times that if Democrats cannot secure the votes they need in November, they will try again in January, when they will likely have stronger majorities in the House and Senate.
Frank, the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, was an instrumental figure in engineering the bailout legislation to the U.S. financial industry, and indicated a new package may seek to ameliorate fears about investing. "The psychological problem is even worse than the real problem," Frank said.

http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/10/24/frank-calls-for-25-percent-cut-in-defense-spending-eventual-tax-hikes/

hjmick
10-24-2008, 11:24 AM
If they gut defense spending, why the need to raise taxes?

red states rule
10-24-2008, 11:25 AM
If they gut defense spending, why the need to raise taxes?

Out of habit, greed, socialism - hell take your pick

http://www.mapleleafweb.com/files/cartoon/oct2204c.gif

Immanuel
10-24-2008, 11:29 AM
And you posted this because...?

Everyone knows that Obama plans on hiking taxes on the middle and upper class as soon as he can get away with this. It won't be long now. He has to in order to pay for all of his plans.

Immie

hjmick
10-24-2008, 11:33 AM
And you posted this because...?

Everyone knows that Obama plans on hiking taxes on the middle and upper class as soon as he can get away with this. It won't be long now. He has to in order to pay for all of his plans.

Immie

Because until the polls close on November 4th, there is still hope that Bob Barr can be elected. ;)

stephanie
10-24-2008, 11:37 AM
wtf?

I posted hoping to wake up maybe just one liberal to not vote for the little Marxist and his Communist party..

sheeesh..

Immanuel
10-24-2008, 11:37 AM
Because until the polls close on November 4th, there is still hope that Bob Barr can be elected. ;)

From your fingertips to God's computer screen! :cool:

Immie

Joe Steel
10-24-2008, 11:39 AM
If they gut defense spending, why the need to raise taxes?

Pay the debt for Bush's wars: Iraq, Afghanistan, class.

Joe Steel
10-24-2008, 11:43 AM
...the little Marxist and his Communist party..


Not even close.

stephanie
10-24-2008, 11:45 AM
Not even close.

Oh but it is way close and spot on..you can lie and deny it all you want..not everybody is blind and as stupid that your party hopes they are..

red states rule
10-24-2008, 11:50 AM
Oh but it is way close and spot on..you can lie and deny it all you want..not everybody is blind and as stupid that your party hopes they are..

http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g283/Catnapper75/politics/liberals0119.jpg

Immanuel
10-24-2008, 11:53 AM
Someone should tell JS that the class war is prosecuted by the Democrats not the Republicans.

Immie

Joe Steel
10-24-2008, 11:59 AM
Oh but it is way close and spot on..you can lie and deny it all you want..not everybody is blind and as stupid that your party hopes they are..

Hmmm....

Let's see.


1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.

Nope.


2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

Nope; a rollback to the pre-Bush level.


3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Nope.


4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

Nope.


5. Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

Nope. The recent government activity was a step in the right direction but we've got a long way to go.


6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.

Nope.


7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

Nope.


8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

Nope.


9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.

Nope.


10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.

Free education to some extent. Childrens' labor already is unlawful.

You're 0 for 10.

Joe Steel
10-24-2008, 12:00 PM
Someone should tell JS that the class war is prosecuted by the Democrats not the Republicans.

Immie

Nope. Democrats just talk about it. Republicans do it.

Immanuel
10-24-2008, 12:01 PM
Nope. Democrats just talk about it. Republicans do it.

As always, you are wrong.

Immie