John McCain: Suspected by Joe Steel Tax Cheat

[Joe Steel]

Looks like McCain is filing fraudulent tax returns.


According to a New York Times article of September 27, 2008 "For McCain and Team, a Host of Ties to Gambling," reported by Jo Becker and Don VanNatta Jr., McCain gambled at the MGM Grand in May 2007.

Apparently McCain is a habitual gambler; he usually plays craps. He even says, "I am a gambling man."

Gambling has tax implications. According to IRS Publication 17, "Your Federal Income Tax", 2007 edition, page 89 "Gambling Winnings. You must include your gambling winnings in income on Form 1040, line 21. If you itemize your deductions on Schedule A (Form 1040), you can deduct gambling losses you had during the year, but only up to the amount of your winnings." In other words, you can't subtract your losses from your winnings and just not report. You have to report the winnings, and then claim the losses.

But McCain's tax returns say nothing about gambling winnings or losses.

McCain's Tax Returns Hide Gambling (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martha-miller/mccains-tax-returns-hide_b_131675.html)

[stephanie]

The Hufferpost...:laugh2:

Hey why not, they've tried everything else...

[jimnyc]

Joe, please provide proof of McCain's specific winnings, not heresy. And if it's an ironclad case, why hasn't the IRS gotten involved? Save your conspiracies for your dimwitted buddies and stick to the facts.

[Joe Steel]

The Hufferpost...:laugh2:

Hey why not, they've tried everything else...

It's an unimpeachable souce but I checked his returns for '06 and '07 anyway. They don't show any gambling winnings. Either he's lying or he's a very bad gambler.

[Joe Steel]

Joe, please provide proof of McCain's specific winnings, not heresy. And if it's an ironclad case, why hasn't the IRS gotten involved? Save your conspiracies for your dimwitted buddies and stick to the facts.

This could be trouble. Unless he's a very bad gambler and never wins anything, his tax returns should show some winnings.


The 72-year-old senator from Arizona is a lifelong gambler, who favours the craps tables, and continues to play today, the New York Times reported.
...

Mr McCain's habit, which appears to take the form of a monthly binge rather than a daily addiction,


John McCain's gambling habit could alienate Christian Republicans (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/uselection2008/johnmccain/3098739/John-McCains-gambling-habit-could-alienate-Christian-Republicans.html)

[jimnyc]

This could be trouble. Unless he's a very bad gambler and never wins anything, his tax returns should show some winnings.

Again, where is the proof? Surely the IRS would be onto this, every casino he's been to would have records.

And let's suppose he did lose, since you cannot prove anything at all, wouldn't it be a bit premature for someone to label him as a cheat with ZILCH for proof?

Come back when you have something other than hot air and we'll discuss.

[Joe Steel]

Again, where is the proof? Surely the IRS would be onto this, every casino he's been to would have records.

And let's suppose he did lose, since you cannot prove anything at all, wouldn't it be a bit premature for someone to label him as a cheat with ZILCH for proof?

Come back when you have something other than hot air and we'll discuss.


Maybe he just didn't gamble in '06 and '07. I don't think so but maybe.


”In the past decade (McCain) has played on Mississippi riverboats, on Indian land, in Caribbean craps pits and along the length of the Las Vegas Strip,” Time reported, quoting aides as saying that the senator plays for thousands of dollars at a time.

A New Yorker profile of McCain in 2005 suggested even more reckless gambling routines in which the senator would spend 14-hour stints at Las Vegas gambling tables, from 10 a.m. to midnight.

John Mccain, Gambling Man (http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=821c5b9a-e57b-4a42-82cc-c66c0ce06071)

[jimnyc]

Maybe he just didn't gamble in '06 and '07. I don't think so but maybe.

So you start a thread calling him a tax cheat, and now you state you have no idea as to facts surrounding the taxes/gambling in those years?

[avatar4321]

So you start a thread calling him a tax cheat, and now you state you have no idea as to facts surrounding the taxes/gambling in those years?

You have to remember that for Joe, it isnt the facts that are important. Getting the accusation out so it can make the rounds in the media that is important.

[Yurt]

So you start a thread calling him a tax cheat, and now you state you have no idea as to facts surrounding the taxes/gambling in those years?

:laugh2:

[manu1959]

So you start a thread calling him a tax cheat, and now you state you have no idea as to facts surrounding the taxes/gambling in those years?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

joe steele is in a hot air balloon realizes he is lost. he lowers his altitude and spots a man fishing from a boat below.

He shouts to him, 'Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don't know where I am.'

The man consults his portable GPS and replies, 'You're in a hot air balloon, approximately 30 feet above a ground elevation of 2346 feet above sea level. You are at 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100 degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude.

He rolls her eyes and says, 'You must be a Republican!'

'I am,' replies the man. 'How did you know?'

'Well,' answers the balloonist, 'Everything you tell me is technically correct, but I have no idea what to do with your information, and I'm still lost. Frankly, you're not much help to me.'

The man smiles and responds, 'You must be a Democrat.'

'I am,' replies the balloonist. 'How did you know?'

'Well,' says the man, 'You don't know where you are or where you're going. You've risen to where you are, due to a large quantity of hot air. You made a promise that you have no idea how to keep, and now you expect me to solve your problem. You're in exactly the same position you were in before we met, but, somehow, now it's my fault.

[Joe Steel]

So you start a thread calling him a tax cheat, and now you state you have no idea as to facts surrounding the taxes/gambling in those years?

I didn't indict him based on hearsay. This is a discussion of the evidence and there's enough to suspect him of tax evasion.

I doubt anyone with his obsession would have no winnings. He spends hours and hours at the craps table. He must have won something. Let him tell us why he didn't report it or deny the winnings.

Or, are you afraid to discover your guy is a crook?

[Joe Steel]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

joe steele is in a hot air balloon realizes he is lost. he lowers his altitude and spots a man fishing from a boat below... and says, 'You must be a Republican!'

'I am,' replies the man. 'How did you know?'



I hope he doesn't fall in. We'll never get the stench off the fish.

[jimnyc]

I didn't indict him based on hearsay. This is a discussion of the evidence and there's enough to suspect him of tax evasion.

I doubt anyone with his obsession would have no winnings. He spends hours and hours at the craps table. He must have won something. Let him tell us why he didn't report it or deny the winnings.

Or, are you afraid to discover your guy is a crook?

You did in fact indict him based on HERESY (thought maybe you needed some help). You called him a tax cheat and have zero proof to back that up.

I'll discover something as soon as you differentiate between retarded conspiracy theories and fact.

[Joe Steel]

You did in fact indict him based on HERESY (thought maybe you needed some help). You called him a tax cheat and have zero proof to back that up.

Sorry, no.


to charge with a crime by the finding or presentment of a jury (as a grand jury) in due form of law

I'm not a federal prosecutor. I can't indict him. If I were, though, I'd investigate.



I'll discover something as soon as you differentiate between retarded conspiracy theories and fact.

The FACT is, his returns for '06 and '07 don't show gambling winnings. The evidence strongly suggests he's hiding them. That's not "retarded" except to the willfully blind.

[jimnyc]

I'm not a federal prosecutor. I can't indict him. If I were, though, I'd investigate.

Indict - to charge with an offense or crime; accuse of wrongdoing; castigate; criticize

Try again!


The FACT is, his returns for '06 and '07 don't show gambling winnings. The evidence strongly suggests he's hiding them. That's not "retarded" except to the willfully blind.

I've yet to see any evidence whatsoever other than HERESY (for the spelling impaired). Where is this evidence you keep speaking of? Accusations during election year ARE NOT evidence.

[Joe Steel]

Indict - to charge with an offense or crime; accuse of wrongdoing; castigate; criticize

Try again!



I've yet to see any evidence whatsoever other than HERESY (for the spelling impaired). Where is this evidence you keep speaking of? Accusations during election year ARE NOT evidence.

Spelling?


Hearsay: hearsay
hearsay evidence

Main Entry: hear·say
Pronunciation: \ˈhir-ˌsā\
Function: noun
Date: circa 1532
1 : rumor
2 : hearsay evidence


I don't see the connection to HERESY:


Main Entry: her·e·sy
Pronunciation: \ˈher-ə-sē, ˈhe-rə-\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural her·e·sies

Etymology: Middle English heresie, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin haeresis, from Late Greek hairesis, from Greek, action of taking, choice, sect, from hairein to take
Date: 13th century

1 a: adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma b: denial of a revealed truth by a baptized member of the Roman Catholic Church c: an opinion or doctrine contrary to church dogma

2 a: dissent or deviation from a dominant theory, opinion, or practice b: an opinion, doctrine, or practice contrary to the truth or to generally accepted beliefs or standards

[jimnyc]

Spelling?

I don't see the connection to HERESY:

My bad, I was wrong, and I apologize.

I guess you can spell, now if we can only get you to comprehend. Why did you not respond to the part where you claim you didn't "indict" McCain?

[Joe Steel]

I've yet to see any evidence whatsoever other than HERESY (for the spelling impaired). Where is this evidence you keep speaking of? Accusations during election year ARE NOT evidence.

I said I looked at the tax returns. Form 1040, Line 21 is blank. That's where gambling winnings are supposed to be reported. In conjunction with knowledge of McCain's gambling habit, that IS evidence of evasion.

[jimnyc]

I said I looked at the tax returns. Form 1040, Line 21 is blank. That's where gambling winnings are supposed to be reported. In conjunction with knowledge of McCain's gambling habit, that IS evidence of evasion.

No, that's evidence that he didn't provide any info on line 21 and that's all. Evidence of evasion would require proof from you that he actually won. Can you provide that? Also, please post the returns for us that you read.

[Joe Steel]

No, that's evidence that he didn't provide any info on line 21 and that's all. Evidence of evasion would require proof from you that he actually won. Can you provide that?

Evidence is not proof. We'd have to see any W2-G he might have received for proof enough to make you happy. Those are not public information.

Other than that, all we have is anecdotal evidence and a fair understanding of probability. He's had hours-long gambling sessions for years. He must have won something and he's has been reported to have won.


Also, please post the returns for us that you read.

Tax returns:

John McCain Income Tax Information (http://www.johnmccain.com/mccainfinancial/)

[jimnyc]

Joe, when a gambler wins more than $600 the establishment MUST get the winners social security number and report it to the IRS. In fact, most establishments will take the taxes on the spot.

Where did you provide evidence that these establishments provided the info to the IRS? Or are you additionally claiming they were in on defrauding the IRS?

[Joe Steel]

Joe, when a gambler wins more than $600 the establishment MUST get the winners social security number and report it to the IRS. In fact, most establishments will take the taxes on the spot.

Where did you provide evidence that these establishments provided the info to the IRS? Or are you additionally claiming they were in on defrauding the IRS?

The house has to furnish a W2-G at the end of the year. That's why they take the information. McCain's returns show no gambling winnings or related withholding. Either he didn't win or he's not reporting his winnings. I think the latter is more likely.

[jimnyc]

The house has to furnish a W2-G at the end of the year. That's why they take the information. McCain's returns show no gambling winnings or related withholding. Either he didn't win or he's not reporting his winnings. I think the latter is more likely.

And what did the house submit pertaining to McCain's winnings?

[Joe Steel]

And what did the house submit pertaining to McCain's winnings?

As I said earlier, those aren't public information and McCain's tax return does not indicate any winnings (Form 1040, Line 21) or withholding (Line 64 and Statement 6.)

[jimnyc]

As I said earlier, those aren't public information and McCain'a tax return does not indicate any winnings (Form 1040, Line 21) or withholding (Line 64 and Statement 6.)

But if they did submit what they're supposed to, then McCain would be in hot water. But they didn't claim he cheated in any way, did they?

He didn't claim gambling wins/losses. The IRS has not reported any wrongdoing. Seems correct to me.

You lose again.

[Joe Steel]

But if they did submit what they're supposed to, then McCain would be in hot water. But they didn't claim he cheated in any way, did they?

He didn't claim gambling wins/losses. The IRS has not reported any wrongdoing. Seems correct to me.

You lose again.

Sorry, no.

The gambling establishment's wouldn't claim anything. That's not their business.

Tax returns aren't final for a few years and the IRS can bring an action whenever it wants to during that time.

Looks like you lose and I'm still batting 1.000.

[jimnyc]

Sorry, no.

The gambling establishment's wouldn't claim anything. That's not their business.

Tax returns aren't final for a few years and the IRS can bring an action whenever it wants to during that time.

Looks like you lose and I'm still batting 1.000.

The establishments absolutely would file with the IRS for those who won. It IS their business to report it, and it's LAW, dumbass.

You're batting "1"? LOL

More like 100% at being a fucking idiot. But we expect that from you, and enjoy your "rhetorical convenience". I won't forget that one too soon. :laugh2:

[namvet]

I'm more interested in how much Osama scamed from this bank and mortgage disaster.

[red states rule]

Hey Joe. you have nothing on this one. I find it funny how libs like you who demand we pay more in taxes ignore your fellow libs who ARE tax cheats

For example

New York State has issued a tax warrant against Keith Olbermann for failure to pay taxes on his humbly named personal corporation, Olbermann Broadcasting Empire, Inc. Olbermann is listed in legal records as the President of Olbermann Broadcasting Empire, Inc.

A call to the Albany County Clerk's Office in upstate New York confirmed that the warrant is still outstanding and that Olbermann has still failed to pay his back taxes. State records show that Olbermann's company failed to pay $2,269.50 in state taxes. A judgement was entered against Olbermann last summer (Docket Date: 8/21/2007), just weeks before Olbermann closed on a a luxurious $4.2 mm condo at Trump Palace, at 200 East 69th Street.

http://taxmanblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/another-liberal-tax-cheat.html

[Joe Steel]

The establishments absolutely would file with the IRS for those who won. It IS their business to report it, and it's LAW, dumbass.

Try again, dumbass.

They file the W2-G and then do nothing more. It's not their job to ensure the taxpayer reports the income.


You're batting "1"? LOL

More like 100% at being a fucking idiot. But we expect that from you, and enjoy your "rhetorical convenience". I won't forget that one too soon. :laugh2:

Yes. 100%. Deal with it, loser.

[Joe Steel]

Hey Joe. you have nothing on this one. I find it funny how libs like you who demand we pay more in taxes ignore your fellow libs who ARE tax cheats

For example

New York State has issued a tax warrant against Keith Olbermann for failure to pay taxes on his humbly named personal corporation, Olbermann Broadcasting Empire, Inc. Olbermann is listed in legal records as the President of Olbermann Broadcasting Empire, Inc.

A call to the Albany County Clerk's Office in upstate New York confirmed that the warrant is still outstanding and that Olbermann has still failed to pay his back taxes. State records show that Olbermann's company failed to pay $2,269.50 in state taxes. A judgement was entered against Olbermann last summer (Docket Date: 8/21/2007), just weeks before Olbermann closed on a a luxurious $4.2 mm condo at Trump Palace, at 200 East 69th Street.

http://taxmanblog.blogspot.com/2008/06/another-liberal-tax-cheat.html

Is Olbermann running for president?

[red states rule]

[QUOTE=jimnyc;305165]The establishments absolutely would file with the IRS for those who won. It IS their business to report it, and it's LAW, dumbass.[quote]

Try again, dumbass.

They file the W2-G and then do nothing more. It's not their job to ensure the taxpayer reports the income.



Yes. 100%. Deal with it, loser.

OK Joey, then we have the Dem who writes the tax laws cheating on his taxes


September 6, 2008 --
Controversial Rep. Charles Rangel, already under fire for not paying
taxes on income from a beachfront villa he owns in a Dominican resort,
also got an interest-free mortgage on the sun-soaked property, his
lawyer revealed yesterday.


The embattled chairman of the Ways and Means Committee got the
mortgage deal along with six other investors in the Caribbean resort,
founded by a major campaign contributor.


His lawyer, Lanny Davis, also conceded that the Harlem Democrat didn't
declare about $75,000 in rental income from his lush villa with
panoramic ocean views at the Punta Cana Yacht Club.


Now, sources said, congressional Republicans are weighing whether to
publicly call on Rangel to abandon his top post on the committee,
which deals with tax-writing.


"Charlie Rangel is the designated leader on tax policy in the Democrat-
led Congress, but while he is authoring massive tax hikes to exact on
middle-class Americans, he is apparently dodging the IRS at all
costs," said Ken Spain, spokesman for the National Republican
Congressional Committee.


The National Legal and Policy Center in Virginia urged the IRS to open
a probe, saying, "NLPC believes that even the latest admissions are
far from the full truth and that the amount of income not properly
reported . . . is far in excess of the amount admitted."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.tv/browse_thread/thread/05e0e6715f6ca5fb

[red states rule]

Is Olbermann running for president?

No, but he is a big time lib who demands WE pay not only our taxes but pay MORE taxes

Why do libs usually say one thing and turn around and do another?

[jimnyc]

Yes. 100%. Deal with it, loser.

You went from 1 - 100 awfully fast! :laugh2:

Face it, your rhetorical convenience crap will only take you so far. Without it, you're nothing more than hot air like your messiah, the big eared ape.

[Joe Steel]

You went from 1 - 100 awfully fast! :laugh2:

Face it, your rhetorical convenience crap will only take you so far. Without it, you're nothing more than hot air like your messiah, the big eared ape.

Do you know how batting averages are calculated?

[Joe Steel]

The establishments absolutely would file with the IRS for those who won. It IS their business to report it, and it's LAW, dumbass.

OK Joey, then we have the Dem who writes the tax laws cheating on his taxes

September 6, 2008 --
Controversial Rep. Charles Rangel,

Is Rangel running for President?

[jimnyc]

Do you know how batting averages are calculated?

No wonder you're so fucking lost when it comes to politics, you seem to think like your LYING friend MFM that politics is a game.

You're batting ZERO, Joe.

Tata, loserboy! :laugh2:

[jimnyc]

Is Rangel running for President?

No, but his ape cousin is.

[red states rule]

It is fun to watch libs and the liberal media NOT to talk about Deadbeat Keith



<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0EBQ0R8esE4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0EBQ0R8esE4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[red states rule]

Is Rangel running for President?

It that all you have? LOL!!!!

You are a desperate boy this morning Joey

[Joe Steel]

No wonder you're so fucking lost when it comes to politics, you seem to think like your LYING friend MFM that politics is a game.

You're batting ZERO, Joe.

Tata, loserboy! :laugh2:

Good for you.

Running-away is your best bet.

[jimnyc]

Good for you.

Running-away is your best bet.

As I stated earlier, not even a need to debate you. Your foaming rants disprove your own idiocy each and every time.

[Joe Steel]

As I stated earlier, not even a need to debate you. Your foaming rants disprove your own idiocy each and every time.

You're back?

I thought you were leaving. I guess I can't trust your word.

[jimnyc]

You're back?

I thought you were leaving. I guess I can't trust your word.

Sorry, MFM is the liar of this board. You are the joke of this board. I never stated I was leaving, you delusional dipshit.

[namvet]

You're back?

I thought you were leaving. I guess I can't trust your word.

look at your reps before you talk about trust.

[red states rule]

look at your reps before you talk about trust.

Joe and trust is like MFM and integrity

[Joe Steel]

Sorry, MFM is the liar of this board. You are the joke of this board. I never stated I was leaving, you delusional dipshit.


What was this, then?


No wonder you're so fucking lost when it comes to politics, you seem to think like your LYING friend MFM that politics is a game.

You're batting ZERO, Joe.

Tata, loserboy!

[red states rule]

http://bp1.blogger.com/_NPeIdlHaoaQ/SEqGJbD8ABI/AAAAAAAABzg/uv0zYTopGQU/s400/obamasuit.bmp

[Missileman]

Evidence is not proof. We'd have to see any W2-G he might have received for proof enough to make you happy. Those are not public information.

Other than that, all we have is anecdotal evidence and a fair understanding of probability. He's had hours-long gambling sessions for years. He must have won something and he's has been reported to have won.



Tax returns:

John McCain Income Tax Information (http://www.johnmccain.com/mccainfinancial/)

He's not an idiot...if he had received a W-2G he would have included it on his tax return. You do know that a W-2G isn't given out on ALL gambling winnings, right?

[stephanie]

They tried to throw this around a couple of weeks ago, but it didn't go anywhere..

so I guess they decided to give her another try...nothing is too low for the Liberals..:laugh2:

[jimnyc]

What was this, then?

Like I said, jo jo, comprehension! YOU were being dismissed! :laugh2:

[Joe Steel]

He's not an idiot...if he had received a W-2G he would have included it on his tax return. You do know that a W-2G isn't given out on ALL gambling winnings, right?

Certainly but that's the only proof the other poster would have accepted.

Regardless, McCain would have had to report any winnings. He reported nothing.

[namvet]

Osama has not released his tax returns, except for 2006. obviously he's hiding something. a lot !!!!!

[Missileman]

Certainly but that's the only proof the other poster would have accepted.

Regardless, McCain would have had to report any winnings. He reported nothing.

You don't have to report ALL winnings...only those that result in a W2G.

[Joe Steel]

You don't have to report ALL winnings...only those that result in a W2G.

Where did you get that?


Gambling winnings are fully taxable and must be reported on your tax return. You must file Form 1040 (PDF) and include all of your winnings. Gambling income includes, but is not limited to, winnings from lotteries, raffles, horse races, and casinos. It includes cash winnings and also the fair market value of prizes such as cars and trips. For additional information, refer to Publication 525, Taxable and Nontaxable Income.

A payer is required to issue you a Form W-2G (PDF) if you receive certain gambling winnings or if you have any gambling winnings subject to Federal income tax withholding. All gambling winnings must be reported irrespective as to whether any portion thereof is subject to withholding. in addition, you may be required to pay an estimated tax on your gambling winnings. For information on withholding on gambling winnings, refer to Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax.

Topic 419 - Gambling Income and Expenses (http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc419.html)

[Nukeman]

Is Olbermann running for president?

Since when do you give a shit about the OP??? You high jack threads every freaking time your on this board and when it is pointed out to you that your POST have NOTHING to do with the OP you don't care. So why should RSR give a shit about YOUR opening post of bullshit. YOU have zero proof except the line with NO information on it. Guess what dip shit I have NO gambling winnings either....

[Joe Steel]

Since when do you give a shit about the OP??? You high jack threads every freaking time your on this board and when it is pointed out to you that your POST have NOTHING to do with the OP you don't care. So why should RSR give a shit about YOUR opening post of bullshit. YOU have zero proof except the line with NO information on it. Guess what dip shit I have NO gambling winnings either....

I started this thread, dumbass.

[Missileman]

Where did you get that?

If I walk into a casino and bet a dollar on a slot machine and win a dollar, there is NO expectation that I claim said dollar on a tax return. In the real world, you only claim what shows up on a W-2G. Those are the only winnings even remotely documented. If there are no W-2Gs for McCain's play noone can prove he won a dime.

[Silver]

Damn Joe...if this was a stupid contest you would have won hands down....

just because you'd be the only one competing .... great job!

[red states rule]

I started this thread, dumbass.

http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i273/redrobin72/troll-2.gif

[avatar4321]

On page 5 and still no sign of any evidence....

My guess is we will be waiting forever.

[Nukeman]

I started this thread, dumbass.

So DUMBASS. Where is your PROOF! YOU have been asked to provide proof for 5 pages yet you have not done so.

I say we take a poll right now to see how many claim gambling winnings on their taxes. Actually lets see how many HAVE winning to claim...

Lets start with you Joe, do you have an winning sthat you claim if not why not or do you NEVER buy a scratch off?

LETS SEE YOUR PRROF DUMBASS!!!!!! YOU MADE THE ACCUSATION NOW BACK IT UP!!!!:poke:

[jimnyc]

So DUMBASS. Where is your PROOF! YOU have been asked to provide proof for 5 pages yet you have not done so.

I say we take a poll right now to see how many claim gambling winnings on their taxes. Actually lets see how many HAVE winning to claim...

Lets start with you Joe, do you have an winning sthat you claim if not why not or do you NEVER buy a scratch off?

LETS SEE YOUR PRROF DUMBASS!!!!!! YOU MADE THE ACCUSATION NOW BACK IT UP!!!!:poke:

Don't hold your breath. He's been asked for proof on several things since this site has been in operation and NEVER provides anything to backup his lame claims. He'll come back with what he thinks is a witty comment but will only be furthering his stupidity.

Do a search on his username and his stated location, people think he's a dumb fuck all over the place! :laugh2:

[Joe Steel]

So DUMBASS. Where is your PROOF! YOU have been asked to provide proof for 5 pages yet you have not done so.

I say we take a poll right now to see how many claim gambling winnings on their taxes. Actually lets see how many HAVE winning to claim...

Lets start with you Joe, do you have an winning sthat you claim if not why not or do you NEVER buy a scratch off?

LETS SEE YOUR PRROF DUMBASS!!!!!! YOU MADE THE ACCUSATION NOW BACK IT UP!!!!:poke:

I've linked to evidence. I never claimed to have proof.

[Joe Steel]

Don't hold your breath. He's been asked for proof on several things since this site has been in operation and NEVER provides anything to backup his lame claims. He'll come back with what he thinks is a witty comment but will only be furthering his stupidity.

Do a search on his username and his stated location, people think he's a dumb fuck all over the place! :laugh2:

Of course they do. They don't have the mental capacity to understand so the dismiss. That's typical for dim-wits.

[jimnyc]

I've linked to evidence. I never claimed to have proof.

You have nothing, nothing at all. You throw shit and hope it sticks, but have yet to make one single post of fact as a member on this board. :finger3:

[Nukeman]

I've linked to evidence. I never claimed to have proof.What fucking evidence?? the fact that line 21 is blank on his tax form?? guess what dipshit so is mine. :poke:

[Joe Steel]

What fucking evidence?? the fact that line 21 is blank on his tax form?? guess what dipshit so is mine. :poke:

No, dumbass. I've linked to a number of articles about McCain's gambing addiction. They raise questions of his compliance with the law about reporting winnings.

[Nukeman]

No, dumbass. I've linked to a number of articles about McCain's gambing addiction. They raise questions of his compliance with the law about reporting winnings.
So your saying you have some "anecdotal evidence". Yaa that will stand up in a court of law. so tell me have you ever claimed any winnings on your taxes??

[avatar4321]

No, dumbass. I've linked to a number of articles about McCain's gambing addiction. They raise questions of his compliance with the law about reporting winnings.

Of course, because some article says McCain has a gambling addiction (with absolutely no evidence its true), we should therefore conclude that he is guilty of tax fraud.

You realize there is absolutely no connection with the two, dont you?

[Nukeman]

So your saying you have some "anecdotal evidence". Yaa that will stand up in a court of law. so tell me have you ever claimed any winnings on your taxes??
Still waiting Joe!!! You going to tell us, or not???? Chickenshit.......

[Joe Steel]

Of course, because some article says McCain has a gambling addiction (with absolutely no evidence its true), we should therefore conclude that he is guilty of tax fraud.

You realize there is absolutely no connection with the two, dont you?

Nonsense. We have eyewitness reports of McCain's marathon gambling sessions. Unless he's a very bad gambler, he must have won something and it had to be reported but he didn't. Why?

[jimnyc]

Nonsense. We have eyewitness reports of McCain's marathon gambling sessions. Unless he's a very bad gambler, he must have won something and it had to be reported but he didn't. Why?

Where's the proof he won anything? Surely if your claiming outright that he defrauded the IRS you have something other than gossipers claiming he has an addiction.

[namvet]

Nonsense. We have eyewitness reports of McCain's marathon gambling sessions. Unless he's a very bad gambler, he must have won something and it had to be reported but he didn't. Why?

we do??? can we see them???? talk to them??? or do you just talk to them in your dreams ????? might consider heading for the lifeboats. yours is going down by the head. ya know Joe Steel rusts.