View Full Version : Palin Tanking
Joe Steel
09-16-2008, 08:21 PM
Miss Wasilla is on her way to being just another rightwing wacko.
Since Sept. 13, Palin's unfavorables have climbed from 30 percent to 36 percent. Meanwhile, her favorables have slipped from 52 percent to 48 percent. That's a three-day net swing of -10 points, and it leaves her in the Sept. 15 Diageo/Hotline tracking poll tied for the smallest favorability split (+12) of any of the Final Four. Over the course of a single weekend, in other words, Palin went from being the most popular White House hopeful to the least.
Palin's Favorability Ratings Begin to Falter (http://http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/16/palin-s-favorability-ratings-begin-to-falter.aspx)
red states rule
09-16-2008, 08:23 PM
Miss Wasilla is on her way to being just another rightwing wacko.
You wish
As we speak, Obama's lead in PA, NY, NJ, MI, and NM are gone
Obama's once huge lead in the Electoral College is gone as well
Psychoblues
09-17-2008, 03:42 AM
No shit, Sherlock. Do you have any credible explanation for it? Other than the fact that her and her running mate are both accredited frauds?
:salute::cheers2::clap::laugh2::cheers2::salute:
PostmodernProphet
09-17-2008, 05:29 AM
No shit, Sherlock. Do you have any credible explanation for it? Other than the fact that her and her running mate are both accredited frauds?
sure there's a credible explanation for it.....some percentage of the American voters are actually going to believe the lies the Dems have been spreading....it's inevitable......now we will have to wait to see the public's reaction as they learn they are all lies....
Joe Steel
09-17-2008, 06:43 AM
You wish
As we speak, Obama's lead in PA, NY, NJ, MI, and NM are gone
Obama's once huge lead in the Electoral College is gone as well
The convention bounce and the Palin stunt helped McCain's numbers but they can't change the fundamentals: McCain is Bush3. As the glow fades, the voters are realizing that and they don't want more of the same.
John McCain and Barack Obama remained neck and neck seven weeks before Election Day, but there's been some softening of the support for McCain and his running mate, a new Ipsos/McClatchy poll has found.
Poll suggests McCain's support softening as race stays tied (http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/52628.html)
red states rule
09-17-2008, 06:45 AM
The convention bounce and the Palin stunt helped McCain's numbers but they can't change the fundamentals: McCain is Bush3. As the glow fades, the voters are realizing that and they don't want more of the same.
Check it out
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/
If what you say is true, your messiah should be up by at least 20 points :laugh2:
Little-Acorn
09-17-2008, 11:06 AM
Check it out
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/
If what you say is true, your messiah should be up by at least 20 points :laugh2:
That sound you just heard was little joesteel and psycho taking one look at your link, clapping their hands over their ears, staring off into the distance, and saying loudly "LA LA LA LA LA LA LA, I can't hear you, it's not so, it isn't really there, LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA, I can't hear you, it's not so......." over and over again.
Poor babies.
red states rule
09-17-2008, 11:09 AM
That sound you just heard was little joesteel and psycho taking one look at your link, clapping their hands over their ears, staring off into the distance, and saying loudly "LA LA LA LA LA LA LA, I can't hear you, it's not so, it isn't really there, LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA, I can't hear you, it's not so......." over and over again.
Poor babies.
If Gov Palin is tanking - it is being reflected in the Daily Tracking poll
Now the libs will pull the race card to expalin why their guy is not up by double digits
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday is unchanged with John McCain attracting 48% of the vote while Barack Obama earns 47%
McCain leads 58% to 38% among those who regularly shop at Wal-Mart while Obama leads 61% to 36% among those who don’t frequent the retail giant. Overall, Obama leads among those who earn less than $40,000 a year while McCain leads among those with higher earnings. Among white voters, Obama has the edge only among those who earn less than $20,000 a year and his advantage among those lower income white voters is just four percentage points (see crosstabs).
Investor confidence has stabilized—at least for the moment--after falling sharply for several days. The economic confidence of those who do not invest was not shaken by the Wall Street events of recent days. As for the political implications, polling conducted last night shows that 47% trust McCain more than Obama on economic issues while 45% trust Obama.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
manu1959
09-17-2008, 11:09 AM
The convention bounce and the Palin stunt helped McCain's numbers but they can't change the fundamentals: McCain is Bush3. As the glow fades, the voters are realizing that and they don't want more of the same.
and obama is carter 2......pick your poison........
red states rule
09-17-2008, 11:11 AM
and obama is carter 2......pick your poison........
http://images.cafepress.com/nocache/product/273722984v2147483647_350x350_Front.jpg
Abbey Marie
09-17-2008, 11:35 AM
Check it out
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/
If what you say is true, your messiah should be up by at least 20 points :laugh2:
Worth copying from your link:
Obama/Biden 207
157 Solid 50 Leaning
McCain/Palin 227
172 Solid 55 Leaning
Toss Up 104
104 Toss Up
red states rule
09-17-2008, 11:42 AM
Worth copying from your link:
Obama/Biden 207
157 Solid 50 Leaning
McCain/Palin 227
172 Solid 55 Leaning
Toss Up 104
104 Toss Up
and the bad news is spreading to the Congressional races
http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=17831
Joe Steel
09-17-2008, 01:08 PM
Check it out
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/
If what you say is true, your messiah should be up by at least 20 points :laugh2:
Real Clear Politics is not a credible source.
Joe Steel
09-17-2008, 01:10 PM
and obama is carter 2......pick your poison........
OK.
Carter's economic performance was better than Reagan's.
In fact, every Democratic president since the end of WWII has had a better economic performance than every Republican president.
red states rule
09-17-2008, 01:12 PM
OK.
Carter's economic performance was better than Reagan's.
In fact, every Democratic president since the end of WWII has had a better economic performance than every Republican president.
Yea, it was so damn good he was soundly fired by the voters, and Pres Reagan won 44 states :laugh2:
hjmick
09-17-2008, 01:19 PM
OK.
Carter's economic performance was better than Reagan's.
In fact, every Democratic president since the end of WWII has had a better economic performance than every Republican president.
Really? You're sure of this?
On 8 of the 10 key economic variables examined, the American economy performed better during the Reagan years than during the pre- and post-Reagan years.
Real economic growth averaged 3.2 percent during the Reagan years versus 2.8 percent during the Ford-Carter years and 2.1 percent during the Bush-Clinton years.
Real median family income grew by $4,000 during the Reagan period after experiencing no growth in the pre-Reagan years; it experienced a loss of almost $1,500 in the post-Reagan years.
Interest rates, inflation, and unemployment fell faster under Reagan than they did immediately before or after his presidency.
The only economic variable that was worse in the Reagan period than in both the pre- and post-Reagan years was the savings rate, which fell rapidly in the 1980s. The productivity rate was higher in the pre-Reagan years but much lower in the post-Reagan years. (http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=1120&full=1)
retiredman
09-17-2008, 01:27 PM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html
Lehman and AIG and the NYSE seem to have wiped out any post convention "bounce" for McCain-Palin.:laugh2:
red states rule
09-17-2008, 01:29 PM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html
Lehman and AIG and the NYSE seem to have wiped out any post convention "bounce" for McCain-Palin.:laugh2:
My MFM, I have not seen you this happy since the troop deaths in Iraq hit 4,000
the Palin ticket is still ahead, and leads where it counts :laugh2:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/
hjmick
09-17-2008, 01:30 PM
Real Clear Politics is not a credible source.
They're at least as credible as Newsweak.
Joe Steel
09-18-2008, 06:41 AM
Really? You're sure of this?
Real economic growth averaged 3.2 percent during the Reagan years versus 2.8 percent during the Ford-Carter years and 2.1 percent during the Bush-Clinton years.
Ford AND Carter?
Bush AND Clinton?
No.
Each president stands alone.
Ford
Carter
Reagan
Bush
Clinton
Average GDP for Reagan's first term was better than for Carter.
Average GDP for both of Reagan's terms wasn't as good as for Carter.
Reagan wasn't as good as the worst Democrat, who, by-the-way, was the most conservative Democratic president. Conservatism fails evertime.
red states rule
09-18-2008, 06:46 AM
Ford AND Carter?
Bush AND Clinton?
No.
Each president stands alone.
Ford
Carter
Reagan
Bush
Clinton
Average GDP for Reagan's first term was better than for Carter.
Average GDP for both of Reagan's terms wasn't as good as for Carter.
Reagan wasn't as good as the worst Democrat, who, by-the-way, was the most conservative Democratic president. Conservatism fails evertime.
Joe I lived through Carter's economy
Double digit inflation
Double digit interest rates - home mortgages going for 18%
Unemployment around 9%
Gas lines around the block
Home heating oil shortages - Peanut wears a sweater and tells us to wear one and conserve
Then libs like you wonder why he lost - and tries to rewrite history
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_mccain_vs_obama-225.html
Lehman and AIG and the NYSE seem to have wiped out any post convention "bounce" for McCain-Palin.:laugh2:
that you would laugh over this is telling
red states rule
09-18-2008, 09:56 AM
that you would laugh over this is telling
It is typical of libs like MFM. the more misery and hardships people face - the happier the left are
MFM blames the President when his neighbor hasnt cut his grass for a week.
PostmodernProphet
09-18-2008, 10:01 AM
RealClear Politics move Wisconsin, Michigan and New Mexico from Obama blue to battleground grey......
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/
red states rule
09-18-2008, 10:16 AM
RealClear Politics move Wisconsin, Michigan and New Mexico from Obama blue to battleground grey......
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/
and the liberal media will get more desperate and play the race card even more
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.