PDA

View Full Version : The root of the Palin phenomenon



Little-Acorn
09-15-2008, 07:03 PM
Conservatives have been happier than at any time in recent memory - a happiness that dates from the announcement by John McCain that Alaska governor Sarah Palin would be his running mate.

Why?

People have speculated that it's because she's young. Or because she's a woman. Or because she's a young, attractive woman. (Would they be as happy over Jennifer Morrison?). Or because she's apparently helpful to McCain's chances of winning in November. Or because she isn't Hillary. Or because she walked the walk - giving birth to a baby she knew had Down's syndrome, instead of aborting it. Or because she's a better shot than Dick Cheney. Or because she's not from Washington DC.

All of those things probably contribute somewhat to the "Palin phenomenon". But they are not the root cause of the joy suffusing the Republican rank & file. So, what is?

Palin is strong, young, charming, humorous, thinks on her feet... and, most importantly, is looking more and more like a genuine conservative.

Genuine conservatives have been becoming more and more rare in the ranks of Republicans. The last three Presidential candidates (four including McCain) have been known chiefly for their willingness to "reach across the aisle", as it's politely known, and compromise with liberals. Or, to describe it more accurately, to give up conservative principles for the sake of getting along.

As a result, conservatives (which still make up the bulk of Repblicans, unlike what you find among Republican leadership) have had to "make do", voting for the least liberal candidate instead of the candidate who supports their values (smaller government, less govt dependency, more responsibility, lower taxes, stronger military, Constitutional adherence, etc.).

But the introduction of Palin (known at first as "Sarah Who?") into a high position in national Republican politics, hit like a bombshell, and is becoming more and more pleasing as info about her comes out. Though not perfect, she is lookig like a genuine conservative - a stance which many thought was a lost art. She supported some pork at first, but ultimately vetoed it. She runs her own life by conservative principles, raising her family with her husband's and friends' help instead of government assistance, exercising her right to keep and bear arms happily, eschewing abortion when many would not. And she has governed much more conservatively than any other Republicans on the national scene, cutting tax rates, closing down government entitlements in her state and city without harming the recipients, selling off extravagant assets, and earning favorable ratings from 80% or more of her constituents.

In short, Sarah Palin represents the resurgence of conservatism in a party that has been increasingly starved for it. And the grassroots response has been tremendous, even if the reponse of some high Republican officials was muted until they began to see how the wind blew.

What's more, Palin shows signs of being able to put conservatism in place in government, if her past performance is anything to go by. She has the charm to woo others, and the bulldog tenacity to get things done where charm fails. She appears to have the steadiness needed to get through the inevitable leftist attacks with a smile and a joke, and stay on course - a conservative course. Conservatives haven't seen the like, since the days of Ronald Reagan, who never lost his charm and humor despite the most vicious attacks of his enemies, in and out of the country's borders.

Much of this is speculation based on only a little eveidence so far. Palin has shined so far in a few interviews, and has come through hasty "investigations" by leftists, with flying colors. But 2 months of a Presidential campaign remains to be fought, and it promises to be nasty. How Palin gets through that, remains to be seen. But preliminary signs look very good.

If Sarah Palin proves to be everything she appears, or even 90% of what she appears so far, she can represent the resurgence of a conservative party in the U.S. A conservatism that many rank-and-file conservatives were beginning to regard as dead and buried, under a flood of compromisers and get-along-ers. Genuine conservatism has been so long absent from Republican leadership, that its unexpected reappearance well nigh takes on the trappings of a renaissance.

That's a pretty tall order, of course, and it will take more than one person to carry it through. But the resurgence must necessarily start with one person.

And so far, Sarah Palin looks like the one.

Immanuel
09-15-2008, 07:21 PM
If Sarah Palin proves to be everything she appears, or even 90% of what she appears so far, she can represent the resurgence of a conservative party in the U.S. A conservatism that many rank-and-file conservatives were beginning to regard as dead and buried, under a flood of compromisers and get-along-ers. Genuine conservatism has been so long absent from Republican leadership, that its unexpected reappearance well nigh takes on the trappings of a renaissance.

Oh that article will go over with Republican politicians real well.

Too bad they won't listen.

Good read L.A., a little bit slanted but not like some of the pro-Obama stuff you read and definitely not as slanted as the hate Palin trash that is out there.

Immie

Little-Acorn
09-15-2008, 07:30 PM
Oh that article will go over with Republican politicians real well.
Who cares? That's not who it's aimed at.


Too bad they won't listen.
Equally unimportant.

Immanuel
09-15-2008, 07:31 PM
Who cares? That's not who it's aimed at.


Equally unimportant.

Why do you say that?

Nevermind, after rereading your second post, I understand what you mean.

Immie

Kathianne
09-15-2008, 07:39 PM
Oh that article will go over with Republican politicians real well.

Too bad they won't listen.

Good read L.A., a little bit slanted but not like some of the pro-Obama stuff you read and definitely not as slanted as the hate Palin trash that is out there.

Immie

I agree. It's slanted. What Palin means to me, which in actuality answers how she is 'Left.' She is a college grad, that chose to keep working after having children. Her and her husband worked out some sort of system, as she not only became president of PTA, she also became mayor, then Governor. Now she is a candidate for VP of US, first for not only an Alaskan, but for a woman. Her husband and 4 of her 5 children back her, the 4 month old being too young to voice an opinion.

Little-Acorn
09-15-2008, 07:45 PM
Why do you say that?

Immie
Whether other politicians will listen to Palin (as VP, or even if she ever becomes President) is unimportant. The majority of politicians (i.e. Congress) in Reagan's day, resolved not to listen to him, too. But Reagan was the first President in a while who most of the American people agreed with, and those people wrote their congresscritters in droves.

Congresscritters often don't listen to other politicians, especially their opposition. But they do listen to the people who vote for them, and who contribute to their campaigns. And Palin, in addition to preaching AND PRACTICING conservative doctrine, has shown a huge ability to attract both approval and contributions from regular people (Note: Donations to the Republican war chest have skyrocketed since the announcement of Palin's selection as VP candidate).

People will contribute to causes they really want. And if an election doesn't offer them a choice they really want, then they will contribute to the one they dislike the least... only not as much.

Palin is showing signs of being what the people want. And that bodes good for the future, if she really does sweep into the national scene as she appears to be starting to.

Little-Acorn
09-15-2008, 07:53 PM
I agree. It's slanted.
It's "slanted" in the direction that most Americans agree with and want to see more of. That's the entire point.

America is, and always has been, a majority conservative country. Even the people who vote for the likes of Clinton, Gore, Kerry, and Obama, would never dream of taking money from their neighbors without their consent, to buy themselves a new car, or even clothes for their kids. And they would never impose laws on their next-door neighbor, forbidding him from putting a lawn in his backyard because some endangered snail lives there. And they would never suggest that they be allowed to examine their neighbor's financial records to see if he is doing "the right things" with his money. The fact that some of them turn arond and vote for politicians who do exactly those things, is one of the enduring mysteries of Ameican politics. But most people absolutely do not believe in such actions in their own lives. A few kooks do, but they are a small, if noisy, minority.

And when someone finally comes along who runs for office while firmly and soundly rejecting those ideas, he (she) will be greeted with happy shouts and open arms, as Sarah Palin has been.

Little-Acorn
09-16-2008, 12:53 PM
She is a college grad, that chose to keep working after having children. Her and her husband worked out some sort of system, as she not only became president of PTA, she also became mayor, then Governor. Now she is a candidate for VP of US, first for not only an Alaskan, but for a woman. Her husband and 4 of her 5 children back her, the 4 month old being too young to voice an opinion.

Is it just me, or does anyone else find it strange that so-called "feminist leaders" are disparaging a woman who proved that she could make it big by her own efforts and hard work while simultaneously raising a family?

I thought that was what the "feminists" wanted?

Psychoblues
09-17-2008, 02:22 AM
It is clear. The "root" or it's origin is what most republicons are most intrigued by anyway.

Great catch, LA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:salute::cheers2::clap::laugh2::cheers2::salute: