stephanie
02-23-2007, 03:49 AM
:lmao: :lmao: This just keeps getting better and better.....There is absolutely....no unity whatsoever amongst the Democrats...Not only will they stab our Military in the back.....They have no problem stabbing each other in ass.....They've only had the oh so slim majority.........FOR TWO MONTHS......eek.... :cheers2:
Republicans must be having a grand old time laughing at the Democrats' :laugh2: remarkable ability to form a circular firing squad while the media laps it up. The Geffen/Dowd/Wolfson/Clinton/Obama flap was just the latest example. Grow up, children. You may be scrapping siblings, but you're part of the same family.
Here's some unsolicited advice:
David Geffen: As one of the most powerful and feared figures in Hollywood, you have an extraordinary ability to raise money for your favored candidate. But the campaign is not about you or your personal grudges as a disillusioned FOB. You're an incredibly savvy guy with the media and you must have known that your interview with Maureen Dowd would make national news in which you, not the candidates, would be the focus. By personally attacking Hillary, you didn't help Obama who is running a campaign based on hope, not negativity. You brought bring him down to the level of Rovian attack politics. :poke: You didn't help the Democratic Party either--As much as many of us hope otherwise, Hillary may still end up as the Democratic nominee. For all of her flaws, do you really think she would make a worse President than John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Sam Brownback, or anyone else the Republicans might throw up? Even if you believe it, do you really want to see Republican attack ads quoting a leading Democrat stating that "Everybody in politics lies, but [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it's troubling." :laugh2: You could substitute "Hollywood" for "politics" and almost any mogul for "the Clintons" and the statement would be even more true. Is it really a good idea to let the media make the campaign about Hollywood? George Clooney's approach that Hollywood should give money, but that a public display that draws attention from the candidate to the celebrity may not help, is something to think about.
Maureen Dowd: You're a brilliant writer, but please curb your bitchy tendencies. In fact you and David Geffen make quite a pair of bitches. You don't want the next President to be a Republican either. You must have known your column quoting a leading Hollywood mogul would draw national press attention. Sure, as a columnist you're free to give your views on the primary candidates. But the campaign isn't about you, or David Geffen.
You must have known your column quoting a leading Hollywood mogul would draw national press attention. Sure, as a columnist you're free to give your views on the primary candidates. But the campaign isn't about you, or David Geffen.
:lol:
the rest of the bitch fest at the lovely site of the oh so Progressive of Peace and Love.....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/geffen-and-wolfson-form-d_b_41889.html
Republicans must be having a grand old time laughing at the Democrats' :laugh2: remarkable ability to form a circular firing squad while the media laps it up. The Geffen/Dowd/Wolfson/Clinton/Obama flap was just the latest example. Grow up, children. You may be scrapping siblings, but you're part of the same family.
Here's some unsolicited advice:
David Geffen: As one of the most powerful and feared figures in Hollywood, you have an extraordinary ability to raise money for your favored candidate. But the campaign is not about you or your personal grudges as a disillusioned FOB. You're an incredibly savvy guy with the media and you must have known that your interview with Maureen Dowd would make national news in which you, not the candidates, would be the focus. By personally attacking Hillary, you didn't help Obama who is running a campaign based on hope, not negativity. You brought bring him down to the level of Rovian attack politics. :poke: You didn't help the Democratic Party either--As much as many of us hope otherwise, Hillary may still end up as the Democratic nominee. For all of her flaws, do you really think she would make a worse President than John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Sam Brownback, or anyone else the Republicans might throw up? Even if you believe it, do you really want to see Republican attack ads quoting a leading Democrat stating that "Everybody in politics lies, but [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it's troubling." :laugh2: You could substitute "Hollywood" for "politics" and almost any mogul for "the Clintons" and the statement would be even more true. Is it really a good idea to let the media make the campaign about Hollywood? George Clooney's approach that Hollywood should give money, but that a public display that draws attention from the candidate to the celebrity may not help, is something to think about.
Maureen Dowd: You're a brilliant writer, but please curb your bitchy tendencies. In fact you and David Geffen make quite a pair of bitches. You don't want the next President to be a Republican either. You must have known your column quoting a leading Hollywood mogul would draw national press attention. Sure, as a columnist you're free to give your views on the primary candidates. But the campaign isn't about you, or David Geffen.
You must have known your column quoting a leading Hollywood mogul would draw national press attention. Sure, as a columnist you're free to give your views on the primary candidates. But the campaign isn't about you, or David Geffen.
:lol:
the rest of the bitch fest at the lovely site of the oh so Progressive of Peace and Love.....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/geffen-and-wolfson-form-d_b_41889.html