*Are You Smarter Than God: And Can You Judge Between God And Man?*

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. So you're a smart guy and all.
2. And lets say you got a very expensive education.
3. Maybe a doctor or something like one maybe a sitting judge.
4. Maybe a high powered job too.
5. Lets say maybe you pull down 10 million a year for instance.
6. Do you think you can judge between God and man?
7. Be an adviser for both towards each other?
8. Can you mediate for man, in an issue pertaining with Gods judgements?
9. Say a man lost his way, or was confused by the Devil, and had done a bad thing.
10. Could you mediate a fair judgement for the man in question?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,

1. So you're a smart guy and all.
2. And lets say you got a very expensive education.
3. Maybe a doctor or something like one maybe a sitting judge.
4. Maybe a high powered job too.
5. Lets say maybe you pull down 10 million a year for instance.
6. Do you think you can judge between God and man?
7. Be an adviser for both towards each other?
8. Can you mediate for man, in an issue pertaining with Gods judgements?
9. Say a man lost his way, or was confused by the Devil, and had done a bad thing.
10. Could you mediate a fair judgement for the man in question?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Have you been hanging around Martin again ?? :laugh2:

[April15]

Moot question as there is no god.

[Yurt]

he's just running from the other thread.

your question is nonsensical.

better luck next time wiz kid.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. What thread?
2. This thread isn't like any other I have been posting on.
3. I think you Yurt have allowed, *The GREAT CWN* to rent head space within your world.
4. When I make posts and everything and all, I do it from my extensive resourcefulness, and massive understanding of reality.
5. I can form the questions and bring truths to this board, but I can't make you drink what you do not understand, and or what is over your head.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[avatar4321]

why would i pretend to be smarter than God? I know I dont know everything.

[Yurt]

Sorry bout that,

1. What thread?
2. This thread isn't like any other I have been posting on.
3. I think you Yurt have allowed, *The GREAT CWN* to rent head space within your world.
4. When I make posts and everything and all, I do it from my extensive resourcefulness, and massive understanding of reality.
5. I can form the questions and bring truths to this board, but I can't make you drink what you do not understand, and or what is over your head.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

:lol:

dude, you can't even keep track of this forum :poke:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Dude your busted.
2. Pwned.
3. Show me where I have been posting anything on this kind of logic?
4. Then come back here and eat your shorts.
5. You have so been burned Yurt.:lol:


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Microcosmos]

People make judgments all the time. Any judgment over another human being is gonna be difficult, but for society to function we need to make decisions. If we leave it in the hands of God, we are like guppies in a pond sitting there waiting for the bigger fish who doesn't know about God. Are we doing God's will by doing nothing? What about God acting through humans (all of us, not just the "chosen" or "anointed" ones)?

[bullypulpit]

Sorry bout that,

1. So you're a smart guy and all.
2. And lets say you got a very expensive education.
3. Maybe a doctor or something like one maybe a sitting judge.
4. Maybe a high powered job too.
5. Lets say maybe you pull down 10 million a year for instance.
6. Do you think you can judge between God and man?
7. Be an adviser for both towards each other?
8. Can you mediate for man, in an issue pertaining with Gods judgements?
9. Say a man lost his way, or was confused by the Devil, and had done a bad thing.
10. Could you mediate a fair judgement for the man in question?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Which God might that be? There have been many since humankind first developed frontal lobes.

[Dilloduck]

Which God might that be? There have been many since humankind first developed frontal lobes.

One God---hundreds, maybe thousands of conceptions of him/her/it.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. The one that is and was before time began, the living God.
2. Jesus Christ.
3. So can you stem a breach between Him and man, can you judge between them both?
4. Mediate.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,

1. The one that is and was before time began, the living God.
2. Jesus Christ.
3. So can you stem a breach between Him and man, can you judge between them both?
4. Mediate.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

There is no breach between man and God.

[BoogyMan]

There is only one mediator between man and God, and that is Christ Jesus. Man cannot pronounce judgement on God and is bound to judge here on earth by righteous judgement (John 7:24) as guided by God's word.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Are you sure about that?
2. Many people would argue the fact.
3. People who have been tricked by *The Devil*, and one way or the other lost so very much.
4. If this were to happen to you, and you seemed to have fallen under the spell of *The Devil*, and then something very bad happened, wouldn't you feel left out and let down by God, like Jonah did?
5. And others who were tried in the Bible, long list.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,

1. Are you sure about that?
2. Many people would argue the fact.
3. People who have been tricked by *The Devil*, and one way or the other lost so very much.
4. If this were to happen to you, and you seemed to have fallen under the spell of *The Devil*, and then something very bad happened, wouldn't you feel left out and let down by God, like Jonah did?
5. And others who were tried in the Bible, long list.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Feeling let down or being "tricked" doesn't separate you from God.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,



There is only one mediator between man and God, and that is Christ Jesus. Man cannot pronounce judgement on God and is bound to judge here on earth by righteous judgement (John 7:24) as guided by God's word.



1. Scripturally you are correct.
2. There is only one Mediator between God and man, for those whom believe in Jesus Christ.
3. But Jesus Christ isn't in every corner of the planet, and or on the Books as present in each court room in America, or on the planet.
4. And there are many persons that do not know Jesus Christ here in the Americas.
5. And also when a man perhaps who does know Jesus Christ, and gets into a difficult situation, and becomes more or less *The Prodigal Son*, in reality.
6. Can you choose and discern how to judge a situation this severe?
7. Are you capable to have enough judgement to make the call?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,






1. Scripturally you are correct.
2. There is only one Mediator between God and man, for those whom believe in Jesus Christ.
3. But Jesus Christ isn't in every corner of the planet, and or on the Books as present in each court room in America, or on the planet.
4. And there are many persons that do not know Jesus Christ here in the Americas.
5. And also when a man perhaps who does know Jesus Christ, and gets into a difficult situation, and becomes more or less *The Prodigal Son*, in reality.
6. Can you choose and discern how to judge a situation this severe?
7. Are you capable to have enough judgement to make the call?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Sure---doesn't mean you'll be accurate--you just do the best you can

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But in a court room, there is no room to be off on judgement, when dealing with a persons life, perhaps even a innocent person who is drawn into a court room on trumped up charges.
2. Think of how Potius Pilate had to judge over Jesus Christ.
3. Was his judgement all that good?
4. Did he do the best he could in that situation, with what me meted out to God himself?
5. Can you expect to do any better that Potius Pilate did?
6. With a innocent man who got into a bad situation with laws on earth, and was still innocent, even if he appeared guilty, thou in fact his crime wasn't a crime, and he was in reality still innocent.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Lets look at this from an angle where you are righteous enough to find yourself in a prosecutionary mode from the world, because you have been chosen to be perfected, and tried by Jesus Christ himself.
2. So you get into a tested reality.
3. Where it appears to you; yourself, that Jesus Christ has turned his back on you.
4. Kinda like what happened to *Job* of *The Bible*.
5. He got tried and tested like no other.
6. Untold pressure was placed upon him.
7. And yet he being a man, didn't break, thou his friends judged harshly with foul judgements, he stood still in his beliefs in himself, and was correct to do so.
8. Even if the facts were set up against him, so hideous, he could easily see how God was ruining him, and it could of been construed as punishment and judgements against him, from God.
9. But he stood still in his beliefs, and held God to accountability, and all the while, he suffered under *The Devils* temptations, while he never knew it first hand, it wasn't God, but *Satan* who was bringing his world to *Dire Straits*.
10. He didn't betray God, and was vindicated, he passed the test.
11. Are you righteous enough to take this level of testing?
12. Much less to be able to understand when a person is being treated like *Job*, was, and be able to *Comfort* and or *Judge*, correctly for *Job*?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





he's just running from the other thread.

your question is nonsensical.

better luck next time wiz kid.



1. I see your weak side shinning through.
2. You indeed are running from my thread.
3. And you can't even fathom this, its so far above your head, its out of site totally.
4. You need a reality check Yurt.
5. I don't need luck to be your better, Yurt.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,






Moot question as there is no god.



1. Can you be sure on this?
2. Can you honestly say you are?
3. Have you not even one time seen or heard something that would lead you to believe that God was?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




Have you been hanging around Martin again ?? :laugh2:

1. Sounds like this answer would be forth coming, "Reach hither and plunge your hand into my side, and put your finger into the holes in my hands."

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





why would i pretend to be smarter than God? I know I dont know everything.



1. Very safe answer, at least you're honest that you couldn't judge correctly.
2. Best *Answer* for most people.

Regards,
SirJAmesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




People make judgments all the time. Any judgment over another human being is gonna be difficult, but for society to function we need to make decisions. If we leave it in the hands of God, we are like guppies in a pond sitting there waiting for the bigger fish who doesn't know about God. Are we doing God's will by doing nothing? What about God acting through humans (all of us, not just the "chosen" or "anointed" ones)?



1. But not often do we see this kind of judgement being made.
2. Once in a rare time.
3. Could you sit in the judgements seat?
4. I'm not talking a murder case where a man was caught murdering people and there were witnesses.
5. Or crime evidence.
6. I'm referring to an unusual case.
7. Where laws were not surely crossed, and yet a man stands in court to defend himself.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. So you're a smart guy and all.
2. And lets say you got a very expensive education.
3. Maybe a doctor or something like one maybe a sitting judge.
4. Maybe a high powered job too.
5. Lets say maybe you pull down 10 million a year for instance.
6. Do you think you can judge between God and man?
7. Be an adviser for both towards each other?
8. Can you mediate for man, in an issue pertaining with Gods judgements?
9. Say a man lost his way, or was confused by the Devil, and had done a bad thing.
10. Could you mediate a fair judgement for the man in question?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Maybe you should ask the folks at the Landover Baptist Church (http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=4263) about this one?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Maybe you should ask the folks at the Landover Baptist Church (http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=4263) about this one?



1. Typical post from some one who has no clue of these things.
2. Landover Baptist Church is a total joke.
3. Nothing but a attack dog unleashed, you know that.
4. I feel rather sorry for you and this thread, that some one would even bring that up.
5. But I am in no way surprised it came from you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. Typical post from some one who has no clue of these things.
2. Landover Baptist Church is a total joke.
3. Nothing but a attack dog unleashed, you know that.
4. I feel rather sorry for you and this thread, that some one would even bring that up.
5. But I am in no way surprised it came from you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You a born again Christian?

[bullypulpit]

There is only one mediator between man and God, and that is Christ Jesus. Man cannot pronounce judgement on God and is bound to judge here on earth by righteous judgement (John 7:24) as guided by God's word.

Why can't can't man pronounce judgment on "God"? And, according to most of the televangelists I hear, they've skipped the middle-man, Jesus, and have their own direct line to "God". The funny thing is they all seem to be getting different messages from "God". Could they simply be the high priests of cults of personality?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




You a born again Christian?




1. I know you have some issues on staying on topic.
2. Please refrain from derailing this thread.
3. This isn't about me, its way over your head obviously.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. I know you have some issues on staying on topic.
2. Please refrain from derailing this thread.
3. This isn't about me, its way over your head obviously.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You're the one bringing up God. I asked if you were a born again Christian. That is on topic.

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,








1. I see your weak side shinning through.
2. You indeed are running from my thread.
3. And you can't even fathom this, its so far above your head, its out of site totally.
4. You need a reality check Yurt.
5. I don't need luck to be your better, Yurt.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Overdose on your sanctimonious pills again ?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




Overdose on your sanctimonious pills again ?



1. I have learned that its important to communicate with those who try and belittle *THE GREAT CWN*, to give them back what they have given me.
2. Its very effective.
3. You have yet to add anything of substance to this thread, are you in a run mode as well?
4. Or is this also way above your head?
5. I think it is.
6. Other wise you would have said something already.
7. I bet your just waiting for the answers, then you will agree with it, like most people do.
8. This isn't about me Marine, its about something you have no idea, *Take A Pass*.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. So what pills are you taking now?
2. Psychotropic ones?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,







1. I have learned that its important to communicate with those who try and belittle *THE GREAT CWN*, to give them back what they have given me.
2. Its very effective.
3. You have yet to add anything of substance to this thread, are you in a run mode as well?
4. Or is this also way above your head?
5. I think it is.
6. Other wise you would have said something already.
7. I bet your just waiting for the answers, then you will agree with it, like most people do.
8. This isn't about me Marine, its about something you have no idea, *Take A Pass*.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

no--your point is muddled in you attempt to be creative. Are you asking if people can be on a jury or what ?
Hint--the simpler the communication the more likely it will be understood.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





no--your point is muddled in you attempt to be creative. Are you asking if people can be on a jury or what ?
Hint--the simpler the communication the more likely it will be understood.



1. I thought it was perfectly clear.
2. You do know what a *Mediator* is right?
3. Re~read the thread.
4. Is this simple enough for you?
5. "In an attempt to be creative", LOL!!!!

READ THIS AGAIN:Sorry bout that,

1. So you're a smart guy and all.
2. And lets say you got a very expensive education.
3. Maybe a doctor or something like one maybe a sitting judge.
4. Maybe a high powered job too.
5. Lets say maybe you pull down 10 million a year for instance.
6. Do you think you can judge between God and man?
7. Be an adviser for both towards each other?
8. Can you mediate for man, in an issue pertaining with Gods judgements?
9. Say a man lost his way, or was confused by the Devil, and had done a bad thing.
10. Could you mediate a fair judgement for the man in question?

"

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,








1. I thought it was perfectly clear.
2. You do know what a *Mediator* is right?
3. Re~read the thread.
4. Is this simple enough for you?
5. "In an attempt to be creative", LOL!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

there are several kinds of mediators all of which do different things

[82Marine89]

no--your point is muddled in you attempt to be creative. Are you asking if people can be on a jury or what ?
Hint--the simpler the communication the more likely it will be understood.

He has problems posting in complete thoughts.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




there are several kinds of mediators all of which do different things



1. Ahhh classic ducking.
2. Seems it fits.
3. Marine is just LOL!!!!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But just sit back and see if anyone else has any good ideas.
2. You two are already scraping the bottom of an empty barrel.
3. And you don't even know it yet.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. NOTE: *Please refrain from posting in this thread if you are drawing from an empty container*.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. NOTE: *Please refrain from posting in this thread if you are drawing from an empty container*.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I guess you won't be posting here anymore. Ain't that right Opie?

Now back to the question you appear to be ducking...

You started a thread about God. Are you a born again Christian?

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,







1. Ahhh classic ducking.
2. Seems it fits.
3. Marine is just LOL!!!!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

*THUD* cwn drops back down to Dillos' ignore list :fu:

[actsnoblemartin]

any agenda behind that question, or its just a question mr oversensitive jew (actsnoblemartin)

:lol:


I guess you won't be posting here anymore. Ain't that right Opie?

Now back to the question you appear to be ducking...

You started a thread about God. Are you a born again Christian?

[BoogyMan]

Sorry bout that,

1. Scripturally you are correct.
2. There is only one Mediator between God and man, for those whom believe in Jesus Christ.
3. But Jesus Christ isn't in every corner of the planet, and or on the Books as present in each court room in America, or on the planet.
4. And there are many persons that do not know Jesus Christ here in the Americas.
5. And also when a man perhaps who does know Jesus Christ, and gets into a difficult situation, and becomes more or less *The Prodigal Son*, in reality.
6. Can you choose and discern how to judge a situation this severe?
7. Are you capable to have enough judgement to make the call?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

It doesn't matter whether you believe or not, there is but one mediator and no-one can gain access to the father except through him.


Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

[5stringJeff]

Moot question as there is no god.

Wrong. There is a God.

[5stringJeff]

Sorry bout that,

1. But not often do we see this kind of judgement being made.
2. Once in a rare time.
3. Could you sit in the judgements seat?
4. I'm not talking a murder case where a man was caught murdering people and there were witnesses.
5. Or crime evidence.
6. I'm referring to an unusual case.
7. Where laws were not surely crossed, and yet a man stands in court to defend himself.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I think one could judge whether someone was acting in accordance with God's will, as contained in the Bible. But only God can judge the intentions of the heart.

[5stringJeff]

I guess you won't be posting here anymore. Ain't that right Opie?

Now back to the question you appear to be ducking...

You started a thread about God. Are you a born again Christian?

I believe he is, judging from his posts, although I've never asked him directly.

[Abbey Marie]

Chessie, I am not trying to be difficult here, but I truly do not understand your question. Are you building a case for "judge not lest ye be judged"?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




*THUD* cwn drops back down to Dillos' ignore list :fu:


1. One less person who needs to be lead.
2. Works for me.
3. I guess you won't be posting in any of my threads as well?
4. That works too.
5. You like so many others haven't a clue what this thread is all about.
6. And I shall dare to say, will never fully comprehend what I'm talking about.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




Chessie, I am not trying to be difficult here, but I truly do not understand your question. Are you building a case for "judge not lest ye be judged"?



1. No problem, you're not being difficult at all, its a tough thing to wrap your head around.
2. Most people have never even thought of this.
3. This is super heavy, and isn't for the every body to learn of.
4. Some of the deepest scriptural teachings, with ideals and judgements not for the ordinary persons.
5. This is what is know as the *Meat* of *The Bible*.
6. And yet is seldom taught.
7. Or even spoken about, less pondered.
8. The answer to your question is *No*.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




I believe he is, judging from his posts, although I've never asked him directly.




1. Whether I am this way or that way, isn't the point of this thread now is it?
2. That's no more than a side issue, which has nothing to do with me being this way or that way.
3. The thread is about can you be a righteous mediator/judge in terms of meting out a *Judgement* on *Account* for, *God* on a person who was brought to a human court, on his guilt or innocence in a questionable matter than had no actual bases for prosecution?
4. Please read the topic heading, it says it right there.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. Whether I am this way or that way, isn't the point of this thread now is it?
2. That's no more than a side issue, which has nothing to do with me being this way or that way.
3. The thread is about can you be a righteous mediator/judge in terms of meting out a *Judgement* on *Account* for, *God* on a person who was brought to a human court, on his guilt or innocence in a questionable matter than had no actual bases for prosecution?
4. Please read the topic heading, it says it right there.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

God has no place in it. If a person is brought to court on civil charges, then he is to be tried on the merits of the case. It is our responsibility as American citizens to serve on juries and stand in judgment of those who fail to follow and break the law.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. I don't think I mentioned any jury.
2. Or whether it was civil, federal, or criminal.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. I don't think I mentioned any jury.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Human courts have juries. You might want to check that out. If they didn't have juries, we wouldn't have to judge their guilt or innocence.

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,








1. I thought it was perfectly clear.
2. You do know what a *Mediator* is right?
3. Re~read the thread.
4. Is this simple enough for you?
5. "In an attempt to be creative", LOL!!!!

READ THIS AGAIN:Sorry bout that,

1. So you're a smart guy and all.
2. And lets say you got a very expensive education.
3. Maybe a doctor or something like one maybe a sitting judge.
4. Maybe a high powered job too.
5. Lets say maybe you pull down 10 million a year for instance.
6. Do you think you can judge between God and man?
7. Be an adviser for both towards each other?
8. Can you mediate for man, in an issue pertaining with Gods judgements?
9. Say a man lost his way, or was confused by the Devil, and had done a bad thing.
10. Could you mediate a fair judgement for the man in question?

"

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Can I discern? Yes.

[manu1959]

yes.......

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Okay, just wondered.
:lol:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,

1. Okay, just wondered.
:lol:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Anything else I can hep u oot wit?

[Yurt]

Sorry bout that,








1. I see your weak side shinning through.
2. You indeed are running from my thread.
3. And you can't even fathom this, its so far above your head, its out of site totally.
4. You need a reality check Yurt.
5. I don't need luck to be your better, Yurt.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

:lol: dumdum, you already answered my post and then you re-answer it, LOOOOL :poke:

so what exactly is it you are trying to understand with this thread?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





:lol: dumdum, you already answered my post and then you re-answer it, LOOOOL :poke:

so what exactly is it you are trying to understand with this thread?


1. No thanks, you wouldn't even understand.
2. I will save it for another day.
3. Anyway, didn't you read Said1's answer, the answer is, *Yes*.
4. That is all you need to know, at this time.
5. Unless some one here can make a decent post that draws my interest.
6. Also, I thought you were done with this thread, early on?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,







1. No thanks, you wouldn't even understand.
2. I will save it for another day.
3. Anyway, didn't you read Said1's answer, the answer is, *Yes*.
4. That is all you need to know, at this time.
5. Unless some one here can make a decent post that draws my interest.
6. Also, I thought you were done with this thread, early on?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

No. My answer to your question was yes. I do believe you're attempting to discuss discernment, no? You really aren't clear - could you quote scripture in order to get a better grasp on where you are coming from, exactly (Kings 3:?- something along those lines, maybe?)

Anyway, my answer does not prohibit further discusion, or does it? :laugh2:

[Yurt]

Sorry bout that,







1. No thanks, you wouldn't even understand.
2. I will save it for another day.
3. Anyway, didn't you read Said1's answer, the answer is, *Yes*.
4. That is all you need to know, at this time.
5. Unless some one here can make a decent post that draws my interest.
6. Also, I thought you were done with this thread, early on?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

thats what you get for thinking :poke: i never said that. since you want to be pompous, your thread is not worth my time.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. *No*,...I mean *Yes*.
2. Look this is a thread about how and if, you have enough understanding about meting out judgement towards a person who was more or less a *Prodigal Son*.
3. A person under the divisive control or *Dire Straits* of the Devil.
4. Really that's what its about.
5. I hope that is helpful.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





thats what you get for thinking :poke: i never said that. since you want to be pompous, your thread is not worth my time.



1. Oh the drama.
2. Thank you for the warning then, again.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,

1. *No*,...I mean *Yes*.
2. Look this is a thread about how and if, you have enough understanding about meting out judgement towards a person who was more or less a *Prodigal Son*.
3. A person under the divisive control or *Dire Straits* of the Devil.
4. Really that's what its about.
5. I hope that is helpful.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Look. You should be able to illustrate your point with actual scripture, first. This would show your savvey at understanding the 'meat of the bible' than what you have shown thus far. Instead, you prattle on about nothing, barely able to articulate your thoughts. Even I can point to places in the bible in order to exemplify YOUR point.

You think the Prodigal Son is a good example of discernment? Cool. Very deep and meaty. :laugh2:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,







Look. You should be able to illustrate your point with actual scripture, first. This would show your savvey at understanding the 'meat of the bible' than what you have shown thus far. Instead, you prattle on about nothing, barely able to articulate your thoughts. Even I can point to places in the bible in order to exemplify YOUR point.

You think the Prodigal Son is a good example of discernment? Cool. Very deep and meaty. :laugh2:






1. This is a thread for well verse *Bible Readers/Theologians*.
2. I know where this is going, and why I made this thread.
3. And what topic it involves.
4. But to go and search for scriptures to make my point clear, isn't the option I prefer to take.
5. Boogyman is very good at bringing in scriptures, and he has that market corned if you asked me.
6. This thread pertains to the *Judgements of God*, how humans look at those *Judgements*.
7. And how is it we as man beings, have a hard time being able to make those *Judgements*.
8. And why God himself had to come to the world and allow his blood to be spilt, in order to be able to *Justifyably*, *Judge* men on earth.
9. And how is it that man in his understanding always has a problem with being fair towards the innocent ones, while all in all the guilty tend to go free.
10. These points of interest, interest some while passing by others.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,













1. This is a thread for well verse *Bible Readers/Theologians*.
2. I know where this is going, and why I made this thread.
3. And what topic it involves.
4. But to go and search for scriptures to make my point clear, isn't the option I prefer to take.
5. Boogyman is very good at bringing in scriptures, and he has that market corned if you asked me.
6. This thread pertains to the *Judgements of God*, how humans look at those *Judgements*.
7. And how is it we as man beings, have a hard time being able to make those *Judgements*.
8. And why God himself had to come to the world and allow his blood to be spilt, in order to be able to *Justifyably*, *Judge* men on earth.
9. And how is it that man in his understanding always has a problem with being fair towards the innocent ones, while all in all the guilty tend to go free.
10. These points of interest, interest some while passing by others.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Essentially, you're talking about different things, that's why your posts are difficult to follow - at least to me. Secondly, you could use examples (any example) to highlight your points ie: what guilty people, what innocent people. In light of all that, I'll only address one point....it's not for humans to judge people, only their actions. Why do people have a hard time with that?

[82Marine89]

Essentially, you're talking about different things, that's why your posts are difficult to follow - at least to me. Secondly, you could use examples (any example) to highlight your points ie: what guilty people, what innocent people. In light of all that, I'll only address one point....it's not for humans to judge people, only their actions. Why do people have a hard time with that?

This thread should be titled *Are you smarter than someone with a 9th Grade education?* Then we could all answer with a resounding *Yes!* and put this thread out of it's misery.

[Said1]

This thread should be titled *Are you smarter than someone with a 9th Grade education?* Then we could all answer with a resounding *Yes!* and put this thread out of it's misery.

All pretenses aside, I think he brought up some interesting points of discussion. The prodigal son is a good example of hating the sin and loving the sinner. I try to live by that, but it's hard sometimes. It's easier to make judgements against people, bolstering one's ego, don't you think?

[82Marine89]

All pretenses aside, I think he brought up some interesting points of discussion. The prodigal son is a good example of hating the sin and loving the sinner. I try to live by that, but it's hard sometimes. It's easier to make judgements against people, bolstering one's ego, don't you think?

I bet you were smiling when you typed that last sentence.

It is easy to pass judgment on another person and no, it doesn't bolster my ego. Jesus Christ was a better man than me. Was He the son of God? I might never know, but I do know if I live my life the way He did I will be a better person for it. I don't believe in hating the sin but loving the sinner. If a person commits a sin/crime and feels no repentance for it, then I have no love for them. If they have committed a sin/crime and served time for it I might look at them differently. If a person acts like an idiot I will continue to treat them as such until the show me that they are not. That's how I live.

* On edit: Not sure if repentance is the correct word so forgive me if that is the case.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Actually this whole thread is based on, *Job*, this book of *The Bible* is what I'm talking about.
2. *The Prodigal Son* was a reference.
3. Also I used *Jesus Christs* measure of justice meted out to him as a reference.
4. My same old critics keep throwing in the same old criticisms, and never seem to learn a thing, and yet they copy and paste other peoples words thinking nobody else has noticed their lack of originality of thought.
5. I wonder why they always have a opinion on things other than the topic, and still think they are intellectually honest, with themselves, and everyone else, those who even bother to read their constant piss and moaning.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

I bet you were smiling when you typed that last sentence.

It is easy to pass judgment on another person and no, it doesn't bolster my ego. Jesus Christ was a better man than me. Was He the son of God? I might never know, but I do know if I live my life the way He did I will be a better person for it. I don't believe in hating the sin but loving the sinner. If a person commits a sin/crime and feels no repentance for it, then I have no love for them. If they have committed a sin/crime and served time for it I might look at them differently. If a person acts like an idiot I will continue to treat them as such until the show me that they are not. That's how I live.


No, I wasn't smiling, it's the truth. There are times where it's easier to look down on someone and think 'what a peice of shit' instead of trying to help them OR take another look at myself. I'm not alone on that point either and I have yet to meet a person who is not guilty of doing this at one point or another. Just about everyone on this messageboard has done it.

What do you get out of treating someone like an idiot? Why not ignore them instead?

As for the your other point about sinners, I was referring to smaller stuff such as homosexuallity. I don't really think of it as a sin, but I don't totally accept it either. However, I don't judge them for it. That's where I was going with that.

On the other hand, if a person shows no remorse for killing someone, then I need to wash my hands of them. It's not my job to judge them, but it is my job to forgive them, for they no not what they do. I'm not perfect, but I try not to waste my energy judging and hating people for things that are totally out of my control.

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,

1. Actually this whole thread is based on, *Job*, this book of *The Bible* is what I'm talking about.
2. *The Prodigal Son* was a reference.
3. Also I used *Jesus Christs* measure of justice meted out to him as a reference.
4. My same old critics keep throwing in the same old criticisms, and never seem to learn a thing, and yet they copy and paste other peoples words thinking nobody else has noticed their lack of originality of thought.
5. I wonder why they always have a opinion on things other than the topic, and still think they are intellectually honest, with themselves, and everyone else, those who even bother to read their constant piss and moaning.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Who has copy and pasted who's words, where?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Its a common practice of the adversary *Marine*.
2. You haven't noticed yet?
3. Go look at those threads he keeps making.
4. I don't even bother reading them anymore.
5. Bored to death.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,

1. Its a common practice of the adversary *Marine*.
2. You haven't noticed yet?
3. Go look at those threads he keeps making.
4. I don't even bother reading them anymore.
5. Bored to death.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I hadn't noticed. You might want to prove that as it's a pretty serious claim - as messageboards go. Glockmail and TM do it so much I'm surprised they're not banned. :laugh2:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But All you have to do is click on his profile, then go to his threads he's made, and *BAM*!
2. He does it non~stop I think.
3. I don't think there are any rules against it.
4. But if I wanted to read whats on the Internet on a debate site, I would just go searching on the Internet.
5. Anyway, I am sorry to bring this up, but I did have to share some of my thoughts on *Marine* after he shared some of his thoughts on me, about my 9th grade education and all, and that's all I needed by the way.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

No, I wasn't smiling, it's the truth. There are times where it's easier to look down on someone and think 'what a peice of shit' instead of trying to help them OR take another look at myself. I'm not alone on that point either and I have yet to meet a person who is not guilty of doing this at one point or another. Just about everyone on this messageboard has done it.

It's called human nature.


What do you get out of treating someone like an idiot? Why not ignore them instead?

I'm easily amused.


As for the your other point about sinners, I was referring to smaller stuff such as homosexuallity. I don't really think of it as a sin, but I don't totally accept it either. However, I don't judge them for it. That's where I was going with that.

A sin is a sin.


On the other hand, if a person shows no remorse for killing someone, then I need to wash my hands of them. It's not my job to judge them, but it is my job to forgive them, for they no not what they do. I'm not perfect, but I try not to waste my energy judging and hating people for things that are totally out of my control.

It's not my job to forgive them. Forgiveness is up to God. It is my job to judge them and hold them accountable for their actions.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But most people can not judge between God and Man.
2. Its contrary to their ground hugging knuckle natures.
3. This kind of topic is way to far over their heads.
4. This is like, *Hummm,...grump, grump, kill the bastard!*: *Must be guilty or he wouldn't be in court*!
5. There is no understanding/judgement within them.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

It's called human nature.

But you said you didn't do that or it didn't boost your ego.




I'm easily amused.

Ok.




A sin is a sin.

Ok.




It's not my job to forgive them. Forgiveness is up to God. It is my job to judge them and hold them accountable for their actions.

If someone has sinned or hurt you, it is up to you to forgive them or not, but the type of forgiveness you are able to give is obviously different than what one would receive from God. It's also not your job to judge anyone. You should judge their actions (discernment) but not them. As a Christian (if you are) your job is to help them. People should take responsiblity for their actions, but no one is accountable to you, at least not in the biblical sense.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Sorry bout that,

1. But most people can not judge between God and Man.
2. Its contrary to their ground hugging knuckle natures.
3. This kind of topic is way to far over their heads.
4. This is like, *Hummm,...grump, grump, kill the bastard!*: *Must be guilty or he wouldn't be in court*!
5. There is no understanding/judgement within them.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas




1. Another worthy point is this.
2. Most people called to be on a jury, have no real understanding on how to pass judgement, especially for a innocent man, who is drawn into court on pretences only God would be of concern.
3. Which is what this thread is all about.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,









1. Another worthy point is this.
2. Most people called to be on a jury, have no real understanding on how to pass judgement, especially for a innocent man, who is drawn into court on pretences only God would be of concern.
3. Which is what this thread is all about.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

They're instructed by the judge.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




They're instructed by the judge.



1. Oh I feel so much better knowing that.
2. Like these roaming jurors have innocent lives weighed in the balance.
3. All the while getting a quick refresher course on *Judgement* right before the gavel hits the wood.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,







1. Oh I feel so much better knowing that.
2. Like these roaming jurors have innocent lives weighed in the balance.
3. All the while getting a quick refresher course on *Judgement* right before the gavel hits the wood.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


I'm not a gambler. trial by a jury of my so called 'peers' scares the hell out me. Plus, I'm really poor.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this thread isn't really about jurors, and being put on trial with a jury.
2. Its about, *You*, being able to make a *Judgement* over a man/person, who was hauled into court, over an issue, that wasn't clear cut against the law.
3. And you were the *Judge* presiding, no jury.
4. And this case involved *God* some how, like maybe the accused was being tried for blasphemy or something of that nature.
5. Where you had to weigh what was being said about this man in court, and what *Gods* laws were saying or the prosecution was saying the accused did, contrary to *Gods* laws.
6. And could you make a sound *Judgement* in this kind of reality.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[manu1959]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this thread isn't really about jurors, and being put on trial with a jury.
2. Its about, *You*, being able to make a *Judgement* over a man/person, who was hauled into court, over an issue, that wasn't clear cut against the law.
3. And you were the *Judge* presiding, no jury.
4. And this case involved *God* some how, like maybe the accused was being tried for blasphemy or something of that nature.
5. Where you had to weigh what was being said about this man in court, and what *Gods* laws were saying or the prosecution was saying the accused did, contrary to *Gods* laws.
6. And could you make a sound *Judgement* in this kind of reality.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

i would forgive them......next case

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,






i would forgive them......next case




1. Okay thanks man, just wondered!:lol:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this thread isn't really about jurors, and being put on trial with a jury.
2. Its about, *You*, being able to make a *Judgement* over a man/person, who was hauled into court, over an issue, that wasn't clear cut against the law.
3. And you were the *Judge* presiding, no jury.
4. And this case involved *God* some how, like maybe the accused was being tried for blasphemy or something of that nature.
5. Where you had to weigh what was being said about this man in court, and what *Gods* laws were saying or the prosecution was saying the accused did, contrary to *Gods* laws.
6. And could you make a sound *Judgement* in this kind of reality.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Didn't I say 'yes', already. :poke:

[Sitarro]

I have a some questions for you Chesswarsnow. It doesn't have anything to do with the thread's subject so I guess you won't answer but I am really curious having labored through the last three pages of this thread, reading each of your posts. Why do you post the way you do? Have you ever received anything positive responses about the way you post or the repetition of the "sorry bout that" line. Why do you leave the a off of about. Why the numbering of sentences and partial sentences. Why the avatar. Why do you finish with, what is usually a very insincere use of the word, regards. Do you realize how very difficult the "design" of your posts are to read...... Why don't you care?

I am not asking you this to be a jerk, I am truly curious. One of the numerous things I do for a living is graphic design. As a designer of page layout I try to make page design nice to look at but even more importantly, easy to look at. I understand that this is just a message board but what you do shows you are trying to do something else besides just post, why these choices? I don't understand and I would guess that most of the board doesn't understand either.

One other question, what made you decide to come back to Debatepolicy.com. Thanks in advance for your answers.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Your first conclusion was right.
2. Maybe on some other thread.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Didn't I say 'yes', already. :poke:



1. I guess you have nothing else to debate about then.
2. Thanks for your input.
3. You passed.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. Few if any man has ever proven worthy to be able to mediate between God and Man.
2. The best one that comes to mind was Abraham.
3. Knowing how to use *Godly Judgement* is something most people have no clue.
4. To be able to advise God, as Abraham did, is a rarity, for sure.
5. Said1 making a statement that he/she can, is truly amazing.
6. I have not seen that type of knowledge coming from Said1, perhaps others have.
7. Can any one else truly say, that they can stand in the gap?
8. I think manu1959 has said as much, maybe he can clarify that for me.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[gabosaurus]

Weirdest DP thread ever. :laugh2:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Yeah this would appear weird to the unfounded mind.
2. Perhaps you may want to think about it.
3. It wouldn't hurt, I don't think.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. I guess no one noticed how I put this thread to bed.
2. Without explaining everything.
3. Anyway, just wondered if anyone noticed!:popcorn:
4. There are so many more roads this thread can and could go down.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[gabosaurus]

As for the original topic of this thread, I will revert to my first ever message board screen name. Back when I was 15 years old:
"Blonde Sex Goddess"

Are you smarter than God? Not smarter, just sexier.

Can you judge between God and Man? I would have to look in his pants...

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. I see your devilishness shinning through.
2. You must still be a young Philly.
3. When you are young, you talk about foolish things.
4. I guess thats normal.:poke:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[gabosaurus]

You are just jealous because I am hotter than what you have access to... :)

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. No I'm not.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[gabosaurus]

Of course, I am assuming you actually have access to someone female.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I am taken.
2. All the good ones are.
3. Especially at my age.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[gabosaurus]

Is she a young Philly?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But when you are, *THE GREAT CWN*, this happens all the time.
2. That's why I have to have a staff.
3. To beat the Philly's off with a stick.
4. Gabby please stop derailing this thread.
5. This isn't the local night club.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Is she a young Philly?

Philly ????? :lol:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Philly ????? :lol:




1. So look what the cat dragged back in.
2. I am glad you are amused.:popcorn:


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Dilloduck]

Sorry bout that,









1. So look what the cat dragged back in.
2. I am glad you are amused.:popcorn:


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

thanks-----Being a Texan I had no idea people from Philadelphia were such a problem.:laugh2:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. My Philly is from *THE PHILIPPINES*.
.....................................:lol:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas