PDA

View Full Version : Liberal Talk Host Cheers Irwin's Death, Supports Tiger Mauling



red states rule
01-05-2008, 09:04 PM
This is really sick, and the left says conservative talk radio is hate radio. No wonder the ratings for Air America is in the basement




LIONELS AND TIGERS

Lib talker Celebrates Fatal Attacks By Animals


snip

LIONEL: Call me wacky, but hurray for the tiger that killed the kid who was... taunting him. Now, I know this is not right... but let's hear it for the wild... I loathe zoos. I'm still cheering the fact that some stingray whacked that Aussie pain in the ass Steve Irwin.


for the complete article

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2008/01/liberal-talk-host-cheers-irwins-death.html

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 04:27 AM
The fucker deserved to die, you dont act like a fucking jackass, and taunt animals, and then expect nothing to happen.

good riddence to him, I am only sad his other two fagget friends arent dead.

as far as the comment on steve irwin, it was retarded, inappropriate, and sick

Incidently, in 1900 we had 100,000 tigers... in 2008 we have 3,000,,,

guess who has killed and been responsible for the decline of the tigers.

here is a hint.

a. humans
b. stupid fucking humans pigs
c. retarded selfish human fuckers
d. duh, all the above asshole

I love tigers, they are near and dear to my heart, and for humans to make animals extinct is stupid, and will be the death of us all.




This is really sick, and the left says conservative talk radio is hate radio. No wonder the ratings for Air America is in the basement




LIONELS AND TIGERS

Lib talker Celebrates Fatal Attacks By Animals


snip

LIONEL: Call me wacky, but hurray for the tiger that killed the kid who was... taunting him. Now, I know this is not right... but let's hear it for the wild... I loathe zoos. I'm still cheering the fact that some stingray whacked that Aussie pain in the ass Steve Irwin.


for the complete article

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2008/01/liberal-talk-host-cheers-irwins-death.html

red states rule
01-06-2008, 07:46 AM
The fucker deserved to die, you dont act like a fucking jackass, and taunt animals, and then expect nothing to happen.

good riddence to him, I am only sad his other two fagget friends arent dead.

as far as the comment on steve irwin, it was retarded, inappropriate, and sick

Incidently, in 1900 we had 100,000 tigers... in 2008 we have 3,000,,,

guess who has killed and been responsible for the decline of the tigers.

here is a hint.

a. humans
b. stupid fucking humans pigs
c. retarded selfish human fuckers
d. duh, all the above asshole

I love tigers, they are near and dear to my heart, and for humans to make animals extinct is stupid, and will be the death of us all.



This nut is a perfect example as to why liberal talk radio is a dismal failure

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 07:48 AM
yes, they are nuts

But tell me what do you think of what i said about the guy and his friends deserving to die for acting like assholes, a.ka. taunting the tiger?


This nut is a perfect example as to why liberal talk radio is a dismal failure

red states rule
01-06-2008, 07:50 AM
yes, they are nuts

But tell me what do you think of what i said about the guy and his friends deserving to die for acting like assholes, a.ka. taunting the tiger?

They did not deserve to die - they acted stupid and paid a heavy price for it

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 07:52 AM
They didnt act stupid, they were not dumb, they acted like assholes, and when you act like a prick, you get whats coming to you

lets put it this way.

3,000 tigers, 6 billion humans, which do you think i care more about?>

Ill give you a hint, the one not killing the tiger

besides humans have nearly made the tiger extinct, humans are destroying their habitat and killing them.

I have zero compassion for assholes who abuse neglect or TAUNT animals

I respectfully disagree with you, and say fuck em

:dance:


They diod not deserve to die - they acted stupid and paid a heavy price for it

100,000 tigers in 1900,

3,000 Tigers today

who is responsible for that

Stupid selfish asshole humans!

can you tell i love tigers/this issue is near and dear to my heart :laugh2:

Hugh Lincoln
01-06-2008, 11:16 AM
There's an incongruity to liberals cheering tigers killing humans. They come at it from an "I love animals" angle, but only by patronization. The truth is that wild animals kill. That's Darwin at work. But liberals would never cheer Darwin's work in other areas, like lesser races being bested by superior races. If liberals are saying "hey, if you taunt a tiger, that's what you get," I agree with them. But again, they wouldn't say the same for, say, the U.S. attacking a country that attacked it first.

Gadget (fmr Marine)
01-06-2008, 02:22 PM
Incidently, in 1900 we had 100,000 tigers... in 2008 we have 3,000,,,

guess who has killed and been responsible for the decline of the tigers.

GLOBAL WARMING?

See below, there is a correlation

Global Warming - More Tiger Culling Seasons for Next 20 Years
By Yura Nidiot
Jan 23, 2009

Central Ukraine -- Global climatologists who specialize in the tiger population predictions have met at the highly specialized training center for advanced tiger studies have found that despite the 3 most inactive years in tiger killing and capturing, there is still a better than 50% chance that there may be more tigers in zoos of the Southeastern and MidAtlantic coasts of the United States.

The specialists in Fredonia have successfully predicted all of the tiger captures and killings after they were free is within an margin of error. Chief spokesman Emil Sitka confidently exclaimed, "There is no doubt that there will be tiger activities, as well breeding programs setting records for the foreseeable future."

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 02:27 PM
im completely confused, you think we have 3,000 tigers because of climate change.

I dont see it, humans have hunted them down, and stolen their habitat for over a hundred years.


GLOBAL WARMING?

See below, there is a correlation

Global Warming - More Tiger Culling Seasons for Next 20 Years
By Yura Nidiot
Jan 23, 2009

Central Ukraine -- Global climatologists who specialize in the tiger population predictions have met at the highly specialized training center for advanced tiger studies have found that despite the 3 most inactive years in tiger killing and capturing, there is still a better than 50% chance that there may be more tigers in zoos of the Southeastern and MidAtlantic coasts of the United States.

The specialists in Fredonia have successfully predicted all of the tiger captures and killings after they were free is within an margin of error. Chief spokesman Emil Sitka confidently exclaimed, "There is no doubt that there will be tiger activities, as well breeding programs setting records for the foreseeable future."

Gadget (fmr Marine)
01-06-2008, 02:44 PM
If you can't see that Global Warming is the reason for their disappearance, you do not understand the big picture. It is beyond question in the scientific community that the debate is over, and to continue to argue the moot point further isolates you in the periphery of the discussion.

You must not have seen Al Gore's other powerpoint presentation.


im completely confused, you think we have 3,000 tigers because of climate change.

I dont see it, humans have hunted them down, and stolen their habitat for over a hundred years.

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 02:49 PM
I see no proof of that, and i have seen proof that man killing and taking the propety of tirgers is having the most if not 100% majority of their problems

How can u say the earth warming a bit is the cause, doesnt make sense to me


If you can't see that Global Warming is the reason for their disappearance, you do not understand the big picture. It is beyond question in the scientific community that the debate is over, and to continue to argue the moot point further isolates you in the periphery of the discussion.

You must not have seen Al Gore's other powerpoint presentation.

Gadget (fmr Marine)
01-06-2008, 02:51 PM
I believe the article, because they are scientists and they have found the correlation:

Global Warming - More Tiger Culling Seasons for Next 20 Years
By Yura Nidiot
Jan 23, 2009

Central Ukraine -- Global climatologists who specialize in the tiger population predictions have met at the highly specialized training center for advanced tiger studies have found that despite the 3 most inactive years in tiger killing and capturing, there is still a better than 50% chance that there may be more tigers in zoos of the Southeastern and MidAtlantic coasts of the United States.

The specialists in Fredonia have successfully predicted all of the tiger captures and killings after they were free is within an margin of error. Chief spokesman Emil Sitka confidently exclaimed, "There is no doubt that there will be tiger activities, as well breeding programs setting records for the foreseeable future."


I see no proof of that, and i have seen proof that man killing and taking the propety of tirgers is having the most if not 100% majority of their problems

How can u say the earth warming a bit is the cause, doesnt make sense to me

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 02:52 PM
is that the whole article?

are they saying tigers cant make it in the wild?

im confused, what is their point?


I believe the article, because they are scientists and they have found the correlation:

Global Warming - More Tiger Culling Seasons for Next 20 Years
By Yura Nidiot
Jan 23, 2009

Central Ukraine -- Global climatologists who specialize in the tiger population predictions have met at the highly specialized training center for advanced tiger studies have found that despite the 3 most inactive years in tiger killing and capturing, there is still a better than 50% chance that there may be more tigers in zoos of the Southeastern and MidAtlantic coasts of the United States.

The specialists in Fredonia have successfully predicted all of the tiger captures and killings after they were free is within an margin of error. Chief spokesman Emil Sitka confidently exclaimed, "There is no doubt that there will be tiger activities, as well breeding programs setting records for the foreseeable future."

Gadget (fmr Marine)
01-06-2008, 02:59 PM
is that the whole article?

are they saying tigers cant make it in the wild?

im confused, what is their point?

I am sure others will clue you in....it is quite apparent. I am sorry you just don't see it clearly yet.

:lol:

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 03:01 PM
im sorry, i just dont get your point, no offense...

but i wish you would tell me what it is other then, global warming is killing off the tigers, i dont see the proof in your article


I am sure others will clue you in....it is quite apparent. I am sorry you just don't see it clearly yet.

:lol:

Gadget (fmr Marine)
01-06-2008, 03:03 PM
....oh, so just because of an article, and in spite of their findings, we don't have to believe it to be true....on blind faith?

actsnoblemartin
01-06-2008, 03:04 PM
hahaha.

No we dont.

Global warming is not gonna kill us all, scare mongering doesnt solve problems, including global warming

:lol:


....oh, so just because of an article, and in spite of their findings, we don't have to believe it to be true....on blind faith?