*Can Edwards Pull Off Iowa?*

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. As of now, it looks like Edwards is looking pretty good in Iowa.
2. Its neck~n~neck.
3. He appeals to most voters as far as race and gender.
4. He is a *White Man*.
5. And looking at the history of voting patterns, you have to conclude that the Neoliberals always vote, *White* and, *Man*.
6. Having never had anything else, as the candidate.
7. So there's a good chance that he will win the nomination.
8. I was wondering how long it would be before he became the front runner?
9. Because he is the normal type of person that the Neoliberals have always elected into office.
10. I don't think a *Black Man* or even a *White Women*, will or can be elected as a President from the Democratic Party, at this time.
11. It will be a Republican *Black Man* ~*White Woman* or *Asian Man~Woman* way before a Democratic candidate that fits my description, will get the nod.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[JohnDoe]

I can only HOPE that Edwards will win Iowa....it will make this race much more interesting and give Hillary and Obama a real left hook.

[avatar4321]

ive been thinking from the beginning that Edwards will win. In fact, if Hillary gets higher than third place in Iowa, i will be surprised.

[truthmatters]

I would love a Edwards presidency

[avatar4321]

I would love a Edwards presidency

naturally.

[truthmatters]

It sure beats a Bush dictatorship

[jimnyc]

It sure beats a Bush dictatorship

You'd be happy if a special education teacher got into office. It would be like your King getting the job.

[avatar4321]

It sure beats a Bush dictatorship

i suggest you invest in a dictionary.

[Lazarus]

You'd be happy if a special education teacher got into office. It would be like your King getting the job.

Well, we've seen what a special education student does as POTUS. :laugh2:

Couldn't resist.

Seriously though, Edwards does have the best GOTV forces.
And his supporters are not those who would be put off by inclement weather.

Hillarys' supporters are more apt to fall and break a hip. They will stay home if it is snowing or icy.

Obama will do well also. He should place a close 2nd.

[truthmatters]

I think its a crack up how people on here can do next to nothing but resort to personal attacks.

It really lets you know even they know their arguement cant stand up to the facts.

I dont think I have ever seen a site quite as full of people doing nothing but just this.

[Sir Evil]

I think its a crack up how people on here can do next to nothing but resort to personal attacks.


Ahh, go fuck yourself..... :laugh2:

[manu1959]

I think its a crack up how people on here can do next to nothing but resort to personal attacks.
It really lets you know even they know their arguement cant stand up to the facts.
I dont think I have ever seen a site quite as full of people doing nothing but just this.

fact is .... it may just be you......

[avatar4321]

I think its a crack up how people on here can do next to nothing but resort to personal attacks.

It really lets you know even they know their arguement cant stand up to the facts.

I dont think I have ever seen a site quite as full of people doing nothing but just this.

pointing out the fact that you dont know the definition of dictator is a personal attack?

[truthmatters]

When someone does not follow the laws of the country he is leading they are a dictator.


Bush was never elected in a legal manner and he uses signing statements as if they give him the power to not follow any law congress makes.

He is a dictator you just refuse to believe in the rule of law over your love of Bush.

[avatar4321]

When someone does not follow the laws of the country he is leading they are a dictator.


Bush was never elected in a legal manner and he uses signing statements as if they give him the power to not follow any law congress makes.

He is a dictator you just refuse to believe in the rule of law over your love of Bush.

he won the election both times. You can't honestly claim that he wasnt unless you ignore all facts.

The signing statements he makes are completely irrelevant because they have no effect on the law. He could say that the bill makes the sky purple, and it wouldn't matter.

The only issue President Bush has with the rule of law is the illegal alien problem. Something you arent upset with him over.

The fact is clear that you don't have a freaking clue what a dictatorship is. If President was or even wanted to be a dictator we would not be in the middle of electing a new President. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that.

[OCA]

I think its a crack up how people on here can do next to nothing but resort to personal attacks.

It really lets you know even they know their arguement cant stand up to the facts.

I dont think I have ever seen a site quite as full of people doing nothing but just this.

Well then you are free to go back to Damo's joint where you can be jerked off by all the libs there.

[Kathianne]

he won the election both times. You can't honestly claim that he wasnt unless you ignore all facts.

The signing statements he makes are completely irrelevant because they have no effect on the law. He could say that the bill makes the sky purple, and it wouldn't matter.

The only issue President Bush has with the rule of law is the illegal alien problem. Something you arent upset with him over.

The fact is clear that you don't have a freaking clue what a dictatorship is. If President was or even wanted to be a dictator we would not be in the middle of electing a new President. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that.Yep, signing statements are much like earmarks, they don't have the 'force of law.' The earmarks are a bit more akin to corruption, as they actually do appropriate money that can be spent, without actually being passed as law.

[Yurt]

When someone does not follow the laws of the country he is leading they are a dictator.


Bush was never elected in a legal manner and he uses signing statements as if they give him the power to not follow any law congress makes.

He is a dictator you just refuse to believe in the rule of law over your love of Bush.

He got elected TWICE --> hahahaahahhaa :lol:

[JohnDoe]

Yep, signing statements are much like earmarks, they don't have the 'force of law.' The earmarks are a bit more akin to corruption, as they actually do appropriate money that can be spent, without actually being passed as law. kathianne,

I wonder if the president ''thinks'' that he does have the force of law behind him on the signing statements? otherwise why would he keep issuing them?

is there some legal argument why he may think this....?

jd

[Kathianne]

kathianne,

I wonder if the president ''thinks'' that he does have the force of law behind him on the signing statements? otherwise why would he keep issuing them?

is there some legal argument why he may think this....?

jd

LOL!